• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Jonathan Wolff

University of Oxford
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    130
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    25
  •  News and Updates
    54

 More details
  • University of Oxford
    Blavatnik School of Government, Wolfson College
    Regular Faculty
Homepage
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics
Social and Political Philosophy
  • All publications (130)
  •  453
    Marx and exploitation
    The Journal of Ethics 3 (2): 105--120. 1999.
    The discussion of the adequacy of Karl Marx''s definition of exploitation has paid insufficient attention to a prior question: what is a definition? Once we understand Marx as offering a reference-fixing definition in a model we will realise that it is resistant to certain objections. A more general analysis of exploitation is offered here and it is suggested that Marx''s own definition is a particular instance of the general analysis which makes a number of controversial moral assumptions.
    Karl MarxExploitation
  •  152
    Introduction [to the symposium on Ronald Dworkin's "sovereign virtue"]
    Ethics 113 (1): 5-7. 2002.
    Value TheorySocial and Political PhilosophyValue Theory, Miscellaneous
  •  262
    Erratum: Barnett, bargaining and the Nash solution
    Noûs 21 (1): 111. 1987.
    Philosophy of EconomicsGame Theory
  •  92
    Barnett, bargaining and the Nash solution
    Noûs 20 (4): 493-506. 1986.
    Philosophy of EconomicsGame Theory
  •  134
    Addressing disadvantage and the human good
    Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (3). 2002.
    This paper sets out a framework in which we can distinguish between four types of redistributive attention to the disadvantaged: compensation; personal enhancement; targeted resource enhancement; and status enhancement. It is argued that in certain cases many of us will have strong intuitions in favour or against one or more strategies for addressing disadvantage, and it is further argued that in such cases it is likely that our reactions are based on assumptions about the human good. Hence the …Read more
    This paper sets out a framework in which we can distinguish between four types of redistributive attention to the disadvantaged: compensation; personal enhancement; targeted resource enhancement; and status enhancement. It is argued that in certain cases many of us will have strong intuitions in favour or against one or more strategies for addressing disadvantage, and it is further argued that in such cases it is likely that our reactions are based on assumptions about the human good. Hence the two issues — addressing disadvantage and the human good — shed light on one another [1]
    Equality of ResourcesPolitical Ethics
  •  101
    What is the value of preventing a fatality?
    In Tim Lewens (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives, Routledge. 2007.
    in Risk: Philosophical Perspectives ed Tim Lewens, Routledge.
    Social and Political PhilosophyEthics
  •  18
    Libertarianism
    Political Libertarianism
  •  19
    Robert Nozick
    Social and Political PhilosophyPolitical Views
  •  10
    Review of John Horton and Suan Mendus, ed. 'After MacIntyre' (review)
    Toleration in Normative Theories
  • Hillel Steiner, An Essay on Rights
    International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 306-315. 1997.
    Social and Political PhilosophyThe Concept of Rights
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback