• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Derk Pereboom

Cornell University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    133
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    20
  •  News and Updates
    113

 More details
  • Cornell University
    Sage School of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of California, Los Angeles
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1985
CV
Homepage
Ithaca, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (133)
  •  168
    Book ReviewsJohn Martin Fischer,. My Way.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 260. $45.00
    Ethics 117 (4): 754-757. 2007.
    Value TheorySemi-CompatibilismFree Will and Responsibility
  •  76
    A Hard-line Reply to Pereboom’s Four-Case Manipulation Argument
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1): 142-159. 2008.
  •  258
    Can God Be Free?
    Philosophical Review 118 (1): 121-127. 2009.
    Topics in Free Will, MiscTheories of Free WillDivine Freedom
  •  137
    Review: Howell, Kant's Transcendental Deduction: An Analysis of the Main Themes in his Critical Philosophy; Assessing Kant's master argument
    Kantian Review 5 90-156. 2001.
    Kant: Transcendental ArgumentsKant: Apperception and Self-ConsciousnessKant: Metaphysics and Epistem…Read more
    Kant: Transcendental ArgumentsKant: Apperception and Self-ConsciousnessKant: Metaphysics and Epistemology, Misc
  •  260
    Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility (edited book)
    with Susan Blackmore, Thomas W. Clark, Mark Hallett, John-Dylan Haynes, Ted Honderich, Neil Levy, Thomas Nadelhoffer, Shaun Nichols, Michael Pauen, Susan Pockett, Maureen Sie, Saul Smilansky, Galen Strawson, Daniela Goya Tocchetto, Manuel Vargas, Benjamin Vilhauer, and Bruce Waller
    Lexington Books. 2013.
    Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility is an edited collection of new essays by an internationally recognized line-up of contributors. It is aimed at readers who wish to explore the philosophical and scientific arguments for free will skepticism and their implications.
    Free Will SkepticismFree Will and ResponsibilityTheories of Free Will, MiscMoral Responsibility, Mis…Read more
    Free Will SkepticismFree Will and ResponsibilityTheories of Free Will, MiscMoral Responsibility, MiscThe Will
  •  1117
    Free Will Skepticism and Bypassing
    with Gunnar Björnsson
    In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. 4, Mit Press. 2014.
    Discusses Eddy Nahmias' “Is Free Will an Illusion?”
    Free Will and NeuroscienceFree Will and Responsibility
  •  87
    Existentialism: Basic Writings (edited book)
    with Charles Guignon
    Hackett Publishing Company. 2001.
    "An invaluable source for undergraduate courses in continental philosophy." --Giovanna Borradori, Vassar College.
  •  137
    Reasons-responsiveness, alternative possibilities, and manipulation arguments against compatibilism: Reflections on John Martin Fischer's my way
    Philosophical Books 47 (3): 198-212. 2006.
    CompatibilismAlternative Possibilities
  •  808
    Four Views on Free Will
    with John Martin Fischer, Robert Kane, and Manuel Vargas
    Wiley-Blackwell. 2009.
    Focusing on the concepts and interactions of free will, moral responsibility, and determinism, this text represents the most up-to-date account of the four major positions in the free will debate. Four serious and well-known philosophers explore the opposing viewpoints of libertarianism, compatibilism, hard incompatibilism, and revisionism The first half of the book contains each philosopher’s explanation of his particular view; the second half allows them to directly respond to each other’s arg…Read more
    Focusing on the concepts and interactions of free will, moral responsibility, and determinism, this text represents the most up-to-date account of the four major positions in the free will debate. Four serious and well-known philosophers explore the opposing viewpoints of libertarianism, compatibilism, hard incompatibilism, and revisionism The first half of the book contains each philosopher’s explanation of his particular view; the second half allows them to directly respond to each other’s arguments, in a lively and engaging conversation Offers the reader a one of a kind, interactive discussion Forms part of the acclaimed _Great Debates in Philosophy_ series.
    CompatibilismSemi-CompatibilismLibertarianism about Free WillFree Will SkepticismTheories of Free Wi…Read more
    CompatibilismSemi-CompatibilismLibertarianism about Free WillFree Will SkepticismTheories of Free Will, MiscIncompatibilism
  •  29
    The Rationalists: Critical Essays on Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz (edited book)
    Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. 1999.
    This book brings together thirteen articles on the most discussed thinkers in the rationalist movement: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Malebranche. These articles address the topics in metaphysics and epistemology that figure most prominently in contemporary work on these philosophers. The articles have all been produced since 1980, and their authors are among the most respected in the field.
    René DescartesSpinoza: Miscellaneous
  •  24
    And Divine Providence
    In Ken Perszyk (ed.), Molinism: The Contemporary Debate, Oxford University Press. pp. 262. 2011.
    Divine Providence
  •  163
    Robert Kane, The Significance of Free Will:The Significance of Free Will
    Ethics 110 (2): 426-430. 2000.
    Libertarianism about Free Will
  •  245
    A Defense of Free Will Skepticism: Replies to Commentaries by Victor Tadros, Saul Smilansky, Michael McKenna, and Alfred R. Mele on Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life
    Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3): 617-636. 2017.
    This paper features Derk Pereboom’s replies to commentaries by Victor Tadros and Saul Smilansky on his non-retributive, incapacitation-focused proposal for treatment of dangerous criminals; by Michael McKenna on his manipulation argument against compatibilism about basic desert and causal determination; and by Alfred R. Mele on his disappearing agent argument against event-causal libertarianism.
    Philosophy of Law
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback