-
60The book discusses the fate of universality and a universal set in several set theories.
-
57Phil Dowe, Galileo, Darwin, and Hawking. The Interplay of Science, Reason and Religion Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 25 (5): 349-351. 2005.
-
54David Smith and Amie Thomasson, editors, phenomenology and philosophy of mindMinds and Machines 18 (3): 417-419. 2008.
-
51Jan Wolenski , Essays on Logic and Its Applications in Philosophy . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 33 (2): 168-170. 2013.
-
48Penelope Maddy , Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 31 (4): 292-294. 2011.
-
48Book Reviews:Patrick Blackburn, Maarten de Rijke and Yde Venema, Modal Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, xxii + 554 pp., US$53.00, ISBN 0-52152-714-7 (paperback) (review)Minds and Machines 15 (1): 126-129. 2005.
-
45Methodologische überlegungen zu tierischen überzeugungenJournal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2): 347-355. 2007.A theory of the beliefs of non-human animals is not closed to us, only because we do not have beliefs of their kind. Starting from a theory of human beliefs and working on a building block model of propositional attitudes a theory of animal beliefs is viable. Such a theory is an example of the broader conception of a heterophenomenological approach to animal cognition. The theory aims at outlining the crucial differences between human and animal beliefs as well as the relations between these att…Read more
-
45Herman Cappelen , Philosophy without Intuitions . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 33 (5): 366-370. 2013.
-
44Can contradictions be asserted?Logic and Logical Philosophy 7 (n/a): 167. 1999.In a universal logic containing naive semantics the semantic antinomies will be provable. Although being provable they are not assertiblebecause of some pragmatic constraints on assertion I will argue for. Furthermore, since it is not acceptable that the thesis of dialethism is a dialethiaitself, what it would be according to naive semantics and the prefered logical systems of dialethism, a corresponding restriction on proof theory isnecessary
-
41Ist die transzendentalpragmatik letztbegründet oder holistisch?Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1). 1995.Is transcendental pragmatics a matter of ultimate foundation or a matter of holism? Transcendental pragmatics as developed by Karl-Otto Apel has been the object of various criticisms. Against the fallibilists' claim (Albert) that argumentation is at last either dogmatic, axiomatic or circular, the transcendental pragmatists have given an argument that ultimate foundation ('Letztbegründung') cannot be proved to be impossible. But this clarification of their claims leaves open the questions whethe…Read more
-
40Naturalistic explanations (of linguistic behaviour) have to answer two questions: What is meant by giving a naturalistic explanation, and what does it explain after all? Two kinds of descriptivism present in Wittgenstein´s work are distinguished and applied to Hirsch´s “division problem”. They answer the two questions raised and keeping in mind their distinction is important to assess naturalistic explanations
-
37Colin McGinn , Truth by Analysis. Games, Names, and Philosophy . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 33 (5): 366-370. 2013.
-
37Methodologische Überlegungen zu tierischen Überzeugungen / Methodological Reflections on Exploring Beliefs in AnimalsJournal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2). 2007.A theory of the beliefs of non-human animals is not closed to us, only because we do not have beliefs of their kind. Starting from a theory of human beliefs and working on a building block model of propositional attitudes a theory of animal beliefs is viable. Such a theory is an example of the broader conception of a heterophenomenological approach to animal cognition. The theory aims at outlining the crucial differences between human and animal beliefs as well as the relations between these att…Read more
-
35Eine Notiz zu den Argumentationsstrukturen in der „Widerlegung des Idealismus”Kant Studien 92 (1): 13-18. 2001.Kant spricht bezüglich der Widerlegung des Idealismus von einem „Beweis”. Das ist sicher der höchste Status, den er bereit ist, einem Argument zuzuschreiben. Diese Notiz hier soll zeigen, daß Kant diesen Anspruch zu Recht erhebt. Dazu reicht eine an der sprachlichen Oberflächenstruktur orientierte Formalisierung. Nun hat Kant natürlich die moderne Prädikatenlogik nicht gekannt, aber für den Gebrauch dieser Logik und ein dem gemäßes Räsonieren bedarf es bekanntlich ja auch nicht der ausdrückliche…Read more
-
32Kearns' Illocutionary Logic and the LiarHistory and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3): 223-225. 2008.In his recent paper in History and Philosophy of Logic, John Kearns argues for a solution of the Liar paradox using an illocutionary logic (Kearns 2007 ). Paraconsistent approaches, especially dialetheism, which accepts the Liar as being both true and false, are rejected by Kearns as making no ?clear sense? (p. 51). In this critical note, I want to highlight some shortcomings of Kearns' approach that concern a general difficulty for supposed solutions to (semantic) antinomies like the Liar. It i…Read more
-
30Coherence theories are regularly confronted with the objection that there can be many coherent systems, so that mere coherence is said to be insufficient as either the defining element of truth or even as a working criterion of truth. This objection has been called the “master objection”. If someone is taking coherence not only as a criterion supporting the truth of a theory, but as an ingredient to a definition of “true” she has to attack the master objection straight on
-
29Truth Value Talk Without QuotationIn Elke Brendel (ed.), Understanding Quotation, De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 7--47. 2011.
-
29Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Rationality and Reflection: How to Think About What to Think. Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 36 (4): 173-175. 2016.Review of Jonathan Kvanvig Rationality and Reflection.
-
26An introduction to paraconsistent logicsPeter Lang. 2005.This book gives an overview of paraconsistent logics - that is logics which allow for inconsistency. Although allowing for inconsistency, paraconsistent logics are worth considering: Logical systems are worth considering in their own right since we can learn about very abstract structural properties of logics and the concepts employed within them such as negation, necessity and consistency. Some non-classical logics are especially of interest from a philosophical perspective since they alone off…Read more
-
25Transcendental Logic's New ClothesIn Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic, . pp. 101. 2007.
-
23John Horty, Frege on Definitions. A Case Study of Semantic Content. Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 32 (4): 319-325. 2012.
-
19Die Welt ist die Gesamtheit der Tatsachen, nicht der DingeGrazer Philosophische Studien 57 (1): 111-131. 1999.Die in Wittgensteins Anfangsthesen des Tractatus formulierte Ansicht, daß Tatsachen die Bausteine der Welt ausmachen, kann auch so interpretiert werden, daß Tatsachen physische Entitäten sind. Die These von der physischen Existenz von Tatsachen wird in der analytischen Philosophie jedoch weitgehend abgelehnt. Hier wird hingegen versucht, diese Position als Tatsachen-Ontologie kohärent zu entwickeln. Vorzüge diese Position wären u.a. eine elegante Deutung der Vielheit verschiedener wahrer Aussage…Read more
-
18Leila Haaparanta (Ed.): The Development of Modern Logic (review)Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1): 189-191. 2011.
-
17Michael Potter and Tom Ricketts, eds. , The Cambridge Companion to Frege . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 32 (4): 319-325. 2012.
-
13Methodological Reflections on Exploring Beliefs in AnimalsJournal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2): 347-355. 2007.A theory of the beliefs of non-human animals is not closed to us, only because we do not have beliefs of their kind. Starting from a theory of human beliefs and working on a building block model of propositional attitudes a theory of animal beliefs is viable. Such a theory is an example of the broader conception of a heterophenomenological approach to animal cognition. The theory aims at outlining the crucial differences between human and animal beliefs as well as the relations between these att…Read more
-
11Saint Vitus DanceIn William Irwin (ed.), Black Sabbath and philosophy: mastering reality, Wiley. pp. 87--95. 2013.
-
8Peter Schotch, Bryson Brown, and Raymond Jennings, eds. , On Preserving: Essays on Preservationism and Paraconsistent Logic . Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 30 (6): 430-431. 2010.
-
8Jordan Howard Sobel, Logic and Theism: Arguments for and against beliefs in God Reviewed byPhilosophy in Review 24 (5): 368-371. 2004.
University of Cologne
PhD, 1993
Areas of Specialization
Logic and Philosophy of Logic |
Epistemology |
Metaphysics and Epistemology |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Logic and Philosophy of Logic |
Metaphysics and Epistemology |