•  12
    The present article is framed within the biosemiotic glossary project as a way to address common terminology within biosemiotic research. The glossary integrates the view of the members of the biosemiotic community through a standard survey and a literature review. The concept of ‘semiotic threshold’ was first introduced by Umberto Eco, defining it as a boundary between semiotic and non-semiotic areas. We review here the concept of ‘semiotic threshold’, first describing its denotation within sem…Read more
  •  7
    Editors' comment
    with Kati Lindström, Mihhail Lotman, Timo Maran, and Silvi Salupere
    Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4): 9-11. 2011.
    N/A
  •  1
    What kind of evolutionary biology suits cultural research?
    Sign Systems Studies 44 (4): 634-647. 2016.
    What kind of evolutionary biology suits cultural research?
  •  13
    The institution of semiotics in Estonia
    with Silvi Salupere, Peeter Torop, and Mihhail Lotman
    Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4): 314-341. 2011.
    The article gives a historical overview of the institutional development of semiotics in Estonia during two centuries, and describes briefly its current status. The key characteristics of semiotics in Estonia include: (1) seminal role of two world-level classics of semiotics from the University of Tartu, Juri Lotman and Jakob von Uexkull; (2) the impact of Tartu–Moscow school of semiotics, with a series of summer schools in Kaariku in 1960s and the establishment of semiotic study of culture; (3)…Read more
  •  6
    Biosemiootika ja looduse sisemise väärtuse probleem. Kokkuvõte
    Sign Systems Studies 29 (1): 364-365. 2001.
  •  3
    Alexandr Levich (1945–2016) and the Tartu–Moscow Biosemiotic Nexus
    Sign Systems Studies 44 (1-2): 255-266. 2016.
    Alexandr Levich and the Tartu–Moscow Biosemiotic Nexus.