-
561John Hick on whether God could be an Infinite PersonJournal of Analytic Theology 4 171-179. 2016."Who or what is God?," asks John Hick. A theist might answer: God is an infinite person, or at least an infinite personal being. Hick disagrees: "God cannot be both a person and infinite." Moreover, he says, the distinction between being a person and being a personal being "is a distinction without a difference." Thus, God cannot be an infinite personal being either. In this essay, I assess Hick's reasons for drawing these conclusions. I argue that, even if some other reasons for drawing these c…Read more
-
518FoundationalismIn Andrew Cullison (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Epistemology, Continuum. pp. 37. 2012.Foundationalists distinguish basic from nonbasic beliefs. At a first approximation, to say that a belief of a person is basic is to say that it is epistemically justified and it owes its justification to something other than her other beliefs, where “belief” refers to the mental state that goes by that name. To say that a belief of a person is nonbasic is to say that it is epistemically justified and not basic. Two theses constitute Foundationalism: (a) Minimality: There are some basic beliefs,…Read more
-
366Transworld sanctity and Plantinga's free will defenseInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (1): 1-21. 1998.A critique of Plantinga's free will defense. For an updated version of this critique, with a reply to objections from William Rowe and Alvin Plantinga, see my "The logical problem of evil: Plantinga and Mackie," in Justin P. McBrayer & Daniel Howard‐Snyder (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to the Problem of Evil, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 19-33.
Bellingham, Washington, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Religion |
Moral Psychology |