-
6Socratic LoveIn Sara Ahbel‐Rappe & Rachana Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates, Blackwell. 2005.This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Socrates' Explicit Doctrine of Love Socrates' Implicit Conclusion about Love The Main Objections to the Socratic Account Conclusion.
-
6Mission from GodIn Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: Life Defense Strategy Saving Word Changed Lives Further Reading.
-
6Epilogue: Socrates or Plato?In Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: Homer The Subjectivity Objection Socrates Further Reading.
-
6Knowledge RulesIn Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: Odysseus's Iron Soul Socrates' Wild Claim The Treasure Parable How Socrates Teaches the World The Incommensurable Objection Socrates Restates the Absurdity Augustine's Tormented Decision The Brute‐Desire Objection Further Reading.
-
6Last WordsIn Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: Swan Song Hemlock Ultimate Disease Conclusion Further Reading.
-
6Bravery AgainIn Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: Advising Parents Perseverance Wisdom Interpretive Puzzle Further Reading.
-
5BenevolenceIn Steven Nadler (ed.), SOCRATES, Wiley‐blackwell. 2009-09-10.This chapter contains sections titled: The Excellence of Exploiting Others The Ruler‐as‐Ruler Argument An Objection The Rulers‐in‐Our‐Cities Argument Further Reading.
-
5Hoffman on Kripke’s WittgensteinPhilosophy Research Archives 12 177-182. 1986.Paul Hoffman argues that Kripke’s Wittgenstein fails in his solution to his own sceptical paradox. I argue that Hoffman fails to see the importance for Kripke’s Wittgenstein of the distinction between agreement in fact and judged agreement. Hoffman is right that no solution to the sceptical paradox can be based on agreement in fact, but the solution of Kripke’s Wittgenstein depends upon judged agreement. An interpretation is given: by ‘judged agreement’ Kripke’s Wittgenstein does not mean unders…Read more
-
1Aristotelian predication, Augustine and the trinityThe Thomist 53 (4). 1989.AUGUSTINE WISHED TO DEFEND AND MAKE AS INTELLIGIBLE AS POSSIBLE THE CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY. I SHOW HOW AUGUSTINE WORKS WITH AN ARISTOTELIAN MODEL OF PREDICATION, DERIVES AN INCOMPLETENESS RESULT WITHIN THE STANDARD FORMS OF PREDICATION, AND ACCEPTS, WITH SOME QUALIFICATION, A NONSTANDARD FORM OF PREDICATION USED BY ARISTOTLE FOR PREDICATING PRIMARY SUBSTANCE OF MATTER
