• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Michael Jacovides

Purdue University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    34
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    4
  •  News and Updates
    32

 More details
  • Purdue University
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of California, Los Angeles
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1997
Email (login required)
West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
General Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Religion
  • All publications (34)
  •  64
    Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. 2011.
    Primary and Secondary Qualities
  •  211
    Annotations to the Speech of the Muses (Plato Republic 546b-c)
    with Kathleen McNamee
    Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 144 31-50. 2003.
    Annotations to the Speech of the Muses (Plato Republic 546b-c).
    Plato: RepublicProclusPlato: MathematicsPlato: Cosmology
  •  214
    Locke's Image of the World
    Oxford University Press. 2017.
    Michael Jacovides provides an engaging account of how the scientific revolution influenced one of the foremost figures of early modern philosophy, John Locke. By placing Locke's thought in its scientific, religious, and anti-scholastic contexts, Jacovides explains not only what Locke believes but also why he believes it.
    Primary and Secondary QualitiesLocke: PerceptionLocke: Primary and Secondary QualitiesLocke: Represe…Read more
    Primary and Secondary QualitiesLocke: PerceptionLocke: Primary and Secondary QualitiesLocke: RepresentationLocke: MechanismLocke: MatterLocke: GravityLocke: Substance
  •  300
    How Berkeley corrupted his capacity to conceive
    Philosophia 37 (3): 415-429. 2008.
    Berkeley’s capacity to conceive of mind-independent bodies was corrupted by his theory of representation. He thought that representation of things outside the mind depended on resemblance. Since ideas can resemble nothing than ideas, and all ideas are mind dependent, he concluded that we couldn’t form ideas of mind-independent bodies. More generally, he thought that we had no inner resembling proxies for mind-independent bodies, and so we couldn’t even form a notion of such things. Because conce…Read more
    Berkeley’s capacity to conceive of mind-independent bodies was corrupted by his theory of representation. He thought that representation of things outside the mind depended on resemblance. Since ideas can resemble nothing than ideas, and all ideas are mind dependent, he concluded that we couldn’t form ideas of mind-independent bodies. More generally, he thought that we had no inner resembling proxies for mind-independent bodies, and so we couldn’t even form a notion of such things. Because conception is a suggestible faculty, Berkeley’s arguments actually made it the case that he himself couldn’t conceive of mind-independent bodies.
    Berkeley: ImmaterialismConceivability, Imagination, and PossibilityBerkeley: IdeasBerkeley: Epistemo…Read more
    Berkeley: ImmaterialismConceivability, Imagination, and PossibilityBerkeley: IdeasBerkeley: Epistemology of Mind
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback