• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Dan Cavedon-Taylor

Open University (UK)
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    33
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    9
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    36

 More details
  • Open University (UK)
    Department of Philosophy
    Lecturer
Homepage
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Mind
Aesthetics
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Meta-Ethics
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
PhilPapers Editorships
Photography
  • All publications (33)
  •  87
    Review The First Sense by M. Fulkerson and Does Perception Have Content? By B. Brogaard (ed.) (review)
    Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261): 833-838. 2015.
    Sensory Modalities
  •  294
    Perceptual content and sensorimotor expectations
    Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243): 383-391. 2011.
    I distinguish between two kinds of sensorimotor expectations: agent‐ and object‐active ones. Alva Noë's answer to the problem of how perception acquires volumetric content illicitly privileges agent‐active expectations over object‐active expectations, though the two are explanatorily on a par. Considerations which Noë draws upon concerning how organisms may ‘off‐load’ internal processes onto the environment do not support his view that volumetric content depends on our embodiment; rather, they s…Read more
    I distinguish between two kinds of sensorimotor expectations: agent‐ and object‐active ones. Alva Noë's answer to the problem of how perception acquires volumetric content illicitly privileges agent‐active expectations over object‐active expectations, though the two are explanatorily on a par. Considerations which Noë draws upon concerning how organisms may ‘off‐load’ internal processes onto the environment do not support his view that volumetric content depends on our embodiment; rather, they support a view of experience which is restrictive of the body's role in perception. My objections undercut central arguments which Noë gives for his brand of enactivism.
    Embodiment and Situated CognitionPhilosophy of Perception, GeneralThe Contents of Perception, MiscPe…Read more
    Embodiment and Situated CognitionPhilosophy of Perception, GeneralThe Contents of Perception, MiscPerception and Action
  •  206
    Still epiphenomenal qualia: Response to Muller
    Philosophia 37 (1): 105-107. 2009.
    Hans Muller has recently attempted to show that Frank Jackson cannot assert the existence of qualia without thereby falsifying himself on the matter of such mental states being epiphenomenal with respect to the physical world. I argue that Muller misunderstands the commitments of qualia epiphenomenalism and that, as a result, his arguments against Jackson do not go through.
    Functionalism and QualiaQualia and MaterialismEpiphenomenalism
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback