-
105Quine's Naturalized Epistemology and the Third Dogma of EmpiricismSouthern Journal of Philosophy 45 (3): 455-472. 2007.This essay reconsiders Davidson's critical attribution of the scheme‐content distinction to Quine's naturalized epistemology. It focuses on Davidson's complaint that the presence of this distinction leads Quine to mistakenly construe neural input as evidence. While committed to this distinction, Quine's epistemology does not attempt to locate a justificatory foundation in sensory experience and does not then equate neural intake with evidence. Quine's central epistemological task is an explanato…Read more
-
23Huw Price , Naturalism Without Mirrors . Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 32 (3): 222-224. 2012.
-
28Dewey, Religion, and the New AtheismContemporary Pragmatism 7 (1): 93-106. 2010.This article explores the conflict between those who find value in religious commitment and others who recommend the complete abandonment of religion. It examines John Dewey's reflections on religion in order to assess its possible resources for addressing this specific conflict. Dewey's discussion highlights deep human impulses that a secular perspective should address. But this should be accomplished not through his proposed broadening of religious life, but by promoting these impulses and the…Read more
-
27The themes of quine’s philosophy: Meaning, reference, and knowledgeedward Becker cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2012; 314 pp.; $96.95 (review)Dialogue 53 (2): 358-360. 2014.
-
23Philip Kitcher, Life After Faith: The Case for Secular Humanism. Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 36 (1): 17-19. 2016.
-
35Becoming John Dewey: Dilemmas of a Philosopher and Naturalist Thomas C. Dalton Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, xi + 377 pp. $45.00 (review)Dialogue 44 (1): 176-. 2005.
-
22Quine on the indeterminacy of translationIn Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy, Wiley-blackwell. 2011.
-
33Murray G. Murphey , The Development of Quine's Philosophy . Reviewed by (review)Philosophy in Review 33 (3). 2013.
-
104Why Quine is Not an ExternalistJournal of Philosophical Research 34 279-304. 2009.This essay reconsiders the place of meaning within Quine’s naturalism. It takes as its point of departure Davidson’s claim that Quine’s linguistic behaviorism entails a form of semantic externalism. It then further locates this claim within the Davidson-Quine debate concerning whether the proximal or distal stimulus is the relevant determinant of semantic content. An interpretation of Quine’s developing views on translation and epistemology is defended that rejects Davidson’s view that Quine be …Read more
-
6Quine's epistemology naturalizedIn Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy, Wiley-blackwell. 2011.
-
27Dewey and the Problem of ReligionProceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45 321-327. 2008.This essay explores the tension between those who find value in the example of the religious life and others who take the intellectual bankruptcy of religious doctrines as recommending the complete abandonment of religion. It briefly describes John Dewey’s attempt to overcome this tension through a rethinking of the religious life and the sources of its continuing value and purpose. Dewey responds to this conflict over religion by attempting to emancipate its fundamental valuefrom the constraint…Read more
-
5Quine's two dogmas of empiricismIn Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy, Wiley-blackwell. 2011.
-
24C. I. Lewis: The Last Great Pragmatist. By Murray G. Murphey (review)Metaphilosophy 38 (5): 718-725. 2007.
-
162What is radical interpretation? Davidson, Fodor, and the naturalization of philosophyInquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (2): 161-184. 2002.Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore have recently criticized Davidson's methodology of radical interpretation because of its apparent failure to reflect how actual interpretation is achieved. Responding to such complaints, Davidson claims that he is not interested in the empirical issues surrounding actual interpretation but instead focuses on the question of what conditions make interpretation possible. It is argued that this exchange between Fodor and Lepore on one side, and Davidson on the other, c…Read more