• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Terry Horgan

University of Arizona
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    223
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    15
  •  News and Updates
    107

 More details
  • University of Arizona
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1974
Homepage
Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Mind
Meta-Ethics
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphilosophy
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Meta-Ethics
Philosophy of Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Probability
17th/18th Century Philosophy
4 more
  • All publications (223)
  •  422
    Kim on mental causation and causal exclusion
    Philosophical Perspectives 11 165-84. 1997.
    The Exclusion ProblemPsychophysical Reduction, Misc
  •  318
    Robust vagueness and the forced-March sorites paradox
    Philosophical Perspectives 8 159-188. 1994.
    I distinguish two broad approaches to vagueness that I call "robust" and "wimpy". Wimpy construals explain vagueness as robust (i.e., does not manifest arbitrary precision); that standard approaches to vagueness, like supervaluationism or appeals to degrees of truth, wrongly treat vagueness as wimpy; that vagueness harbors an underlying logical incoherence; that vagueness in the world is therefore impossible; and that the kind of logical incoherence nascent in vague terms and concepts is benign …Read more
    I distinguish two broad approaches to vagueness that I call "robust" and "wimpy". Wimpy construals explain vagueness as robust (i.e., does not manifest arbitrary precision); that standard approaches to vagueness, like supervaluationism or appeals to degrees of truth, wrongly treat vagueness as wimpy; that vagueness harbors an underlying logical incoherence; that vagueness in the world is therefore impossible; and that the kind of logical incoherence nascent in vague terms and concepts is benign rather than malignant. I describe some implications for logic, semantics, and metaphysics
    Sorites ParadoxIncoherentism about Vagueness
  •  179
    Supervenience and cosmic hermeneutics
    Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22 (S1): 19-38. 1984.
    Supervenience and Physicalism
  •  3
    Cognition is real
    Behaviorism 15 (1): 13-25. 1987.
    Eliminativism about Propositional AttitudesPhilosophy of Cognitive Science, Miscellaneous
  •  134
    Psychologism, semantics, and ontology
    Noûs 20 (1): 21-31. 1986.
    20th Century German PhilosophyHusserl: Philosophy of Mind
  •  105
    Truth and ontology
    Philosophical Papers 15 (1): 1-21. 1986.
    No abstract
    Truth, Misc
  •  717
    Troubles on moral twin earth: Moral queerness revived
    with Mark Timmons
    Synthese 92 (2). 1992.
    J. L. Mackie argued that if there were objective moral properties or facts, then the supervenience relation linking the nonmoral to the moral would be metaphysically queer. Moral realists reply that objective supervenience relations are ubiquitous according to contemporary versions of metaphysical naturalism and, hence, that there is nothing especially queer about moral supervenience. In this paper we revive Mackie's challenge to moral realism. We argue: (i) that objective supervenience relation…Read more
    J. L. Mackie argued that if there were objective moral properties or facts, then the supervenience relation linking the nonmoral to the moral would be metaphysically queer. Moral realists reply that objective supervenience relations are ubiquitous according to contemporary versions of metaphysical naturalism and, hence, that there is nothing especially queer about moral supervenience. In this paper we revive Mackie's challenge to moral realism. We argue: (i) that objective supervenience relations of any kind, moral or otherwise, should be explainable rather than sui generis; (ii) that this explanatory burden can be successfully met vis-à-vis the supervenience of the mental upon the physical, and in other related cases; and (iii) that the burden cannot be met for (putative) objective moral supervenience relations.
    Moral Error Theories and FictionalismMoral QueernessMoral SupervenienceMoral Epistemology, Misc
  •  177
    Connectionism and the commitments of folk psychology
    with John Tienson
    Philosophical Perspectives 9 127-52. 1995.
    Connectionism and Eliminativism
  •  80
    Substitutivity and the causal connective
    Philosophical Studies 42 (1). 1982.
    Attitude AscriptionsSubstitutivity in Attitude Ascriptions
  • Nonreductive materialism
    In Richard Warner & Tadeusz Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Blackwell. 1994.
    Nonreductive Materialism
  •  200
    Recognitional concepts and the compositionality of concept possession
    Philosophical Issues 9 27-33. 1998.
    CompositionalityRecognitional Concepts
  •  38
    Replies to Corbi and Barker
    Josep Corbi raises several worries about the metaethical position that Mark Timmons and I have articulated and defended, which we call “nondescriptivist cognitivism.â€â€¦ His remarks prompt some points of clarification…. Timmons and I characterize descriptive content as “way-the-world-might-be†content. We maintain that “base case†beliefs—roughly, those non-evaluative and evaluative beliefs whose contents have the simplest kinds of logical form—are of two types: a non-evaluative b…Read more
    Josep Corbi raises several worries about the metaethical position that Mark Timmons and I have articulated and defended, which we call “nondescriptivist cognitivism.â€â€¦ His remarks prompt some points of clarification…. Timmons and I characterize descriptive content as “way-the-world-might-be†content. We maintain that “base case†beliefs—roughly, those non-evaluative and evaluative beliefs whose contents have the simplest kinds of logical form—are of two types: a non-evaluative belief is an is-commitment with respect to a core descriptive content, and an evaluative belief is an ought-commitment with respect to a core descriptive content. Core descriptive contents are those descriptive contents expressible by (nonevaluative) atomic sentences. Concerning the notion of a core descriptive content, Corbi says.
    Moral JudgmentMoral Concepts
  •  718
    Jackson on physical information and qualia
    Philosophical Quarterly 34 (April): 147-52. 1984.
    The Knowledge Argument
  •  63
    Books Reviews
    Mind 100 (398): 290-293. 1991.
    Software
  •  300
    Science nominalized properly
    Philosophy of Science 54 (2): 281-282. 1987.
    Although Hale and Resnik are correct in their specific objection to my proposal for nominalizing science, the proposal can be saved by means of a simple and plausible modification
    Science, Logic, and Mathematics
  •  328
    Mental quausation
    Philosophical Perspectives 3 47-74. 1989.
    Reasons and CausesNomological Theories of CausationDonald DavidsonAnomalous Monism and Mental Causat…Read more
    Reasons and CausesNomological Theories of CausationDonald DavidsonAnomalous Monism and Mental CausationTheories of Causation, MiscMental Causation, Misc
  •  273
    Representation without rules
    with John Tienson
    Philosophical Topics 17 (1): 147-74. 1989.
    The Connectionist/Classical DebateAI without Representation?Philosophy of Linguistics
  •  188
    Token physicalism, supervenience, and the generality of physics
    Synthese 49 (3): 395-413. 1981.
    Supervenience and PhysicalismMetaphysics of Mind
  •  159
    The austere ideology of folk psychology
    Mind and Language 8 (2): 282-297. 1993.
    Eliminativism about Propositional Attitudes
  •  91
    Psychologistic semantics and moral truth
    Philosophical Studies 52 (3). 1987.
    Moral ExpressivismSemantics
  •  506
    Troubles for new wave moral semantics: The 'open question argument' revived
    with Mark Timmons
    Philosophical Papers 21 (3): 153-175. 1992.
    (1992). TROUBLES FOR NEW WAVE MORAL SEMANTICS: THE ‘OPEN QUESTION ARGUMENT’ REVIVED. Philosophical Papers: Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 153-175. doi: 10.1080/05568649209506380
    The Open Question ArgumentMoral Expressivism
  •  253
    The Transvaluationist Conception of Vagueness
    The Monist 81 (2): 313-330. 1998.
    Transvaluationism makes two fundamental claims concerning vagueness. First, vagueness is logically incoherent in a certain way: vague discourse is governed by semantic standards that are mutually unsatisfiable. But second, vagueness is viable and legitimate nonetheless; its logical incoherence is benign.
    Incoherentism about Vagueness
  • Spindel Conference 1987 Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind
    with John Tienson
    Dept. Of Philosophy, Memphis State University. 1988.
    Neural Networks and Connectionism
  •  9
    Nonreductive materialism and the explanatory autonomy of psychology
    In Steven J. Wagner & Richard Wagner (eds.), Naturalism: A Critical Appraisal, University of Notre Dame Press. 1993.
    Nonreductive MaterialismAutonomy, Misc
  •  191
    Materialism: Matters of definition, defense, and deconstruction
    Philosophical Studies 131 (1): 157-83. 2006.
    How should the metaphysical hypothesis of materialism be formulated? What strategies look promising for defending this hypothesis? How good are the prospects for its successful defense, especially in light of the infamous “hard problem” of phenomenal consciousness? I will say something about each of these questions.
    Formulating Physicalism
  •  61
    Reply to Egan
    Philosophical Studies 76 (2-3). 1994.
    Philosophy of LanguageMeaning
  •  166
    Deconstructing new wave materialism
    with John Tienson
    In Carl Gillett & Barry Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents, Cambridge University Press. pp. 307--318. 2001.
    In the first post World War II identity theories (e.g., Place 1956, Smart 1962), mind brain identities were held to be contingent. However, in work beginning in the late 1960's, Saul Kripke (1971, 1980) convinced the philosophical community that true identity statements involving names and natural kind terms are necessarily true and furthermore, that many such necessary identities can only be known a posteriori. Kripke also offered an explanation of the a posteriori nature of ordinary theoretica…Read more
    In the first post World War II identity theories (e.g., Place 1956, Smart 1962), mind brain identities were held to be contingent. However, in work beginning in the late 1960's, Saul Kripke (1971, 1980) convinced the philosophical community that true identity statements involving names and natural kind terms are necessarily true and furthermore, that many such necessary identities can only be known a posteriori. Kripke also offered an explanation of the a posteriori nature of ordinary theoretical identities such as that water = H2O. We identify the kinds and substances involved in theoretical identities by certain of their contingent properties. What we discover when we discover a theoretical identity is the underlying nature of the kind that we identify by those contingent properties. Now, of course, it was being a posteriori, not being contingent, that mattered to the identity theorists anyway, so the necessity of identity is not, in itself, damaging to mind brain identity theories. However, Kripke also argued persuasively that the alleged mind brain identities could not be treated in the same way as ordinary theoretical identities. We "identify" pain by feeling it, and surely how it feels is an essential property of pain, not a contingent property. Thus, a mind body identity theory must provide a different explanation of why its identities are a posteriori. A new wave of materialists has appeared on the scene with a new strategy for explaining [1] the a posteriori nature of its alleged identities. The strategy is to locate the explanation for the a posteriori nature of mind body identities, not on the side of the world, but on the side of the mind -in different ways of thinking about or imagining, or in different concepts. Thus, on this new view, there is only one property—this brain process type, which is identical with this pain..
    Phenomenal ConceptsPhysicalism
  •  94
    DISCUSSIONS: Action Theory Without Actions
    Mind 90 (359): 406-414. 1981.
    The Nature of ActionAction Theory, MiscellaneousCausal Theory of Action
  •  49
    Editor's introduction
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (S1). 1984.
  •  326
    Blobjectivism and indirect correspondence
    with Matjaž Potrč
    Facta Philosophica 2 (2): 249-270. 2000.
    Ontology
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback