• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Jiri Raclavsky

Masaryk University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    72
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    10

 More details
  • Masaryk University
    Researcher
Homepage
Brno, Czechia
Areas of Specialization
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Language
Areas of Interest
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Language
  • All publications (72)
  • Individuals retired-A comment (Pavel Tichy's conception)
    Filosoficky Casopis 50 (2): 301-306. 2002.
  • Explikace a deukce: of jednoduché k rozvětvené teorii typů [Explication and Deduction: From Simple to Ramified Theory of Types]
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4): 37-53. 2012.
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, General WorksLogic and Philosophy of Logic, MiscType Theory in Mathem…Read more
    Logic and Philosophy of Logic, General WorksLogic and Philosophy of Logic, MiscType Theory in MathematicsRussell: Theory of Types
  •  69
    Základy explikace sémantických pojmů [Foundations of Explication of Semantic Concepts
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (4): 488-505. 2012.
    It is a truism that semantic concepts are relative to language. I distinguish two kinds of them in accordance to their relativity to language L; the relativity is either explicit , or implicit . If language is explicated, the concepts of the former kind can be easily explicated in a plausible way and we resist semantic paradoxes. In the case of the latter concepts, the explication is also accessible and paradox-free. One can find then new interesting facts concerning famous Tarski’s theorem
    Liar ParadoxLogical Semantics and Logical Truth
  •  474
    Conceptual and Derivation Systems
    with Petr Kuchyňka
    Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2): 159-174. 2011.
    Pavel Materna proposed valuable explications of concept and conceptual system. After their introduction, we contrast conceptual systems with (a novel notion of) derivation systems. Derivation systems differ from conceptual systems especially in including derivation rules. This enables us to show close connections among the realms of objects, their concepts, and reasoning with concepts.
    Logic in PhilosophyLogical Semantics and Logical TruthLogic and Philosophy of Logic, General WorksLo…Read more
    Logic in PhilosophyLogical Semantics and Logical TruthLogic and Philosophy of Logic, General WorksLogical Consequence and Entailment
  •  1
    P. Kolář, Pravda A Fakt
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (1): 127-132. 2006.
  •  67
    Ontologie hudebního díla: platonismus vs.„platonismus “
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 14 (2): 208-231. 2007.
    Ontology of a Musical Work: Platonism vs. "Platonism"
  •  46
    K Zouharově deskripční teorii významu vlastních jmen
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (2): 207-217. 2006.
  •  44
    Introduction
    Human Affairs 21 (3): 237-238. 2011.
    French Philosophy
  •  59
    Co obnáší kontingentní existence individuí
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 17 (3): 374-387. 2010.
  •  66
    Semantic concept of existential presupposition
    Human Affairs 21 (3): 249-261. 2011.
    Strawson’s work seems to contain both pragmatic and semantic concepts of presupposition. The former concept has largely been studied by many philosophers and linguists, while the latter has not been properly investigated (van Fraassen being an exception). The present author explicates the semantic concept of existential presupposition in relation to deriving existential statements and distinguishing their de dicto/de re variants (in the rather generalized sense following Tichý).
    Philosophy of LinguisticsIntensional Modal LogicLogical Consequence and EntailmentQuantified Modal L…Read more
    Philosophy of LinguisticsIntensional Modal LogicLogical Consequence and EntailmentQuantified Modal Logic
  •  90
    On the interaction of semantics and deduction in Transparent Intensional Logic
    Logic and Logical Philosophy 23 (1): 57-68. 2014.
    It is sometimes objected that Tichý’s logic is not a logic because it underestimates deduction, providing only logical analyses of expressions. I argue that this opinion is wrong. First of all, to detect valid arguments, which are formulated in a language, there needs to be logical analysis to ascertain which semantical entities are involved. Entailment is defined as an extralinguistic affair relating those constructions. The validity of an argument, composed of propositional constructions, stem…Read more
    It is sometimes objected that Tichý’s logic is not a logic because it underestimates deduction, providing only logical analyses of expressions. I argue that this opinion is wrong. First of all, to detect valid arguments, which are formulated in a language, there needs to be logical analysis to ascertain which semantical entities are involved. Entailment is defined as an extralinguistic affair relating those constructions. The validity of an argument, composed of propositional constructions, stems from the properties of the constructions. Such properties are displayed by the derivation rules of Tichý’s system of deduction
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogics
  • M. Zouhar, Podoby Referencie
    Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 12 (1): 112-116. 2005.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback