-
146
-
49Replies (review)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3). 2005.Lucky is the writer whose commentators combine perceptiveness and grace. My two commentators delved deeply into the framework I assume in WAI. Where they see gaps, they elegantly nudge the discussion towards needed extensions/clarifications. Both use the monograph to launch searching metaphysical questions—about method and content. I will take up matters of method first, then turn to specific questions in the interpretation of Descartes and the metaphysics of essence/necessity/conceivability.
-
6Essays on Reference, Language, and Mind (edited book)Oup Usa. 2012.This volume collects Keith Donnellan's key contributions dating from the late 1960s through the early 1980s, along with a substantive introduction by the editor Joseph Almog, which disseminates the work to a new audience and for posterity.
-
50Semantical considerations on modal counterfactual logic with corollaries on decidability, completeness, and consistency questionsNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (2): 467-479. 1980.
-
188The philosophy of David Kaplan (edited book)Oxford University Press. 2010.This volume collects new, previously unpublished articles on Kaplan, analyzing a broad spectrum of topics ranging from cutting edge linguistics and the ...
-
22Perhaps (?), New logical foundations are needed for quantum mechanicsLogique Et Analyse 21 (82): 251. 1978.
-
115Is a Unified Description of Language-and-Thought Possible?Journal of Philosophy 102 (10): 493-531. 2005.
-
26David Kaplan: the man at workIn Joseph Almog & Paolo Leonardi (eds.), The philosophy of David Kaplan, Oxford University Press. pp. 1. 2010.
-
225The structure–in–things: Existence, essence and logicProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 (2). 2003.It has been common in contemporary philosophical logic to separate existence, essence and logic. I would like to reverse these separative tendencies. Doing so yields two theses, one about the existential basis of truth, the other about the essentialist basis of logic. The first thesis counters the common claim that both logical and essential truths-in short, structural truths-are existence-free. It is proposed that only real existences can generate essentialist and logical predications. The seco…Read more
-
37RepliesPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3): 717-734. 2007.Lucky is the writer whose commentators combine perceptiveness and grace. My two commentators delved deeply into the framework I assume in WAI. Where they see gaps, they elegantly nudge the discussion towards needed extensions/clarifications. Both use the monograph to launch searching metaphysical questions—about method and content. I will take up matters of method first, then turn to specific questions in the interpretation of Descartes and the metaphysics of essence/necessity/conceivability.
-
256
-
93Direct reference and significant cognition: Any paradoxes?1Philosophical Books 47 (1): 2-14. 2006.
-
86The Plenitude of Structures and Scarcity of PossibilitiesJournal of Philosophy 88 (11): 620-622. 1991.
-
124Précis of what am I? (review)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3). 2005.What Am I? is so-called because of its focus on Descartes’ primal question in the mind-body realm and his primal answer, viz. “a man”. The question and answer are primal in both senses of the adjective: they come first, early in meditation II, when the topic is broached for the first time; and, in my view of Descartes, they are also the most fundamental question and answer. There are other questions—many many other questions—Descartes raises about the mind-body problem. Some came to substitute f…Read more
-
89A Unified Treatment of (Pro-) Nominals in Ordinary EnglishIn Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference, Oxford University Press. 2015.