Cecile Laborde

Mind and World. By John McDowell. 191 pp. n.p.g. Art and the French Commune: Imagining Paris after War and Revolution. By Albert Boime The Princeton Series in Nineteenth‐Century Art, Culture and Society xv + 234 pp. $19.95, £14.95 paper. Individual Choice and the Structures of History: Alexis de Tocqueville as Historian Reappraised. By Harvey Mitchell 290 pp. $54.95, £35.00 cloth. Zakhor: Jewish History and Jewish Memory. By Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi, 2d ed.. 190pp., $12.95 paper. The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the EU Administration. By Michelle Cini xii + 244 pp $24.95 cloth. The Medieval Cult of Saints: Formations and Transformations. By Barbara Abou‐El‐Haj, xviii + 456 pp. £18.95 paperback. Between Tradition and Modernity: Haim Zhitlowski, Simon Dubnow, Ahad Ha‐Am, and the Shaping of Modern Jewish Identity. By David H. Weinberg, x + 385 pp., n.p.g. Print Politics: The Press and Radical Opposition in Early Nineteenth‐century England. By Kevin Gilmartin Cambridge Studies in Romanticism 21, pp. xiv and 274. $59.95/£35.00 cloth. Social Functions of Literature: Alexander Pushkin and Russian Culture. By Paul Debreczeny xvi + 282 pp. £30. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945 By Mike Hawkins x + 344 pp. £19.95/$27.95 paper, £45.00/$69.95 cloth. Translate This Darkness: The Life of Christiana Morgan, The Veiled Woman in Jung's Circle. By Claire Douglas. 398 pp. $16.95, £11.95 paper. The Mammoth and the Mouse: Microhistory and Morphology. By Florike Egmond and Peter Mason. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997). XIII + 245 pp. n.p.g. Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development 1909–1936. By Bruce L. McCormack, xviii + 499 pp. £19.99 paper. Four Neglected Essays by Immanuel Kant. By Stephen Palmquist,, 121 pp. paper, n.p.g. The Tree of Philosophy. By Stephen Palmquist 210 pp. $35.00 HK cloth, $4.50 HK paper. Medieval Venuses and Cupids: Sexuality, Hermeneutics, and English Poetry. By Theresa Tinkle Figurai, Reading Medieval Culture, 294 pp. $39.50, £35.00 cloth. Portals, Pilgrimage, and Crusade in Western Tuscany. By Dorothy F. Glass, xvii + 145 pp $39.50/£35.00 cloth. Psychoanalysis, Historiography, and Feminist Theory: The Search for Critical Method. By Katherine Kearns, xii + 171 pp. $54.95/£35.00 cloth $17.95/£12.95 paper. Authority and the Sacred: Aspects of the Christianisation of the Roman World. By Peter Brown, xiii + 91 pp. £6.95, $9.95 paper. Order in the Twilight. By Bernhard Waidenfels; translated and edited by David J. Parent, xxvi + 179 pp. $36.95/£34.95 cloth. Germany from Napoleon to Bismarck, 1800–1866. By Thomas Nipperdey. Translated by Daniel Nolan 760 pp. $69.95 hardcover. Proudhon and His Age. By John Ehrenberg,, ix + 184 p. $45.00 cloth. To Live Together: Shaping New Attitudes to Peace Through Education. Edited by Daniel S. Halpérin, Studies in Comparative Education, vii + 186 pp. n.p.g. paper. Trade Unions and Democratic Participation in Europe: A Scenario for the 21st Century. Edited by Gerard Kester and Henry Pinaud, xiv + 296 pp. £40.00 cloth. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. By Graham Oppy, xvii + 376 pp. £40.00, $59.95 cloth. Modernité et morale. By Charles Larmore 257pp. 160 FF paper. Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought. By Annabel S. Brett, xii + 254 pp. $59.95/£35.00 cloth. Seeds of Virtue and Knowledge. By Maryanne Cline Horowitz xviii + 373 pp. $49.50, £37.50 cloth. Declamation on the Nobility and Preeminence of the Female Sex. By Henricus Cornelius Agrippa. Translated and Edited by Albert Rabil, Jr. xxxii + 109 pp. $33.00/£26.50 cloth $10.00/£11.25 paper. The Long Affair: Thomas Jefferson and the French Revolution, 1785–1800. By Conor Cruise O'Brien, xvii + 367 pp. $29.95/£23.95 cloth. Women in Russia and Ukraine. Edited by Rosalind Marsh xvii + 350pp. $69.95/£55.00 cloth $27.95/£19.95 paper. Rhetoric and Culture in Lacan. By Gilbert D. Chaitin xii + 278 pp. $54.95/£35.00 cloth $17.95/ £12.95 paper. White Heat: People and Technology. By Carroll Pursell, 224 pp. $18.00 paper. Isaiah Berlin. By John Gray 189 pp. $ 13.95 paper. Tory Radicalism: Margaret Thatcher, John Major, and the Transformation of Modern Britain, 1979–1997. By Earl A. Reitan x + 222 pp. $23.95 paper. Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany. By Maria Tatar 213 pp. $14.95, £12.50 paper. Crafting the Third World: Theorizing Underde‐velopment in Rumania and Brazil. By Joseph L. Love xvi + 348 pp. £50.00 cloth, £16.95 paper. The Austro‐Prussian War: Austria's War with Prussia and Italy in 1866. By Geoffrey Wawro xiii + 313 pp. £40.00/$59.95 cloth. Harmonious Tensions: The Writings of Friedrich Schiller. By Steven D. Martinson 448 pp. $55.00. Early Modern Liberalism. By Annabel Patterson ix + 314 pp. $49.95/£35.00 cloth.

The first comprehensive analysis of the philosophical issues raised by the hijab controversy in France, this book also conducts a dialogue between contemporary Anglo-American and French political theory and defends a progressive republican solution to so-called multicultural conflicts in contemporary societies. It critically assesses the official republican philosophy of laïcité which purported to justify the 2004 ban on religious signs in schools. Laïcité is shown to encompass a comprehensive theory of republican citizenship, centered on three ideals: equality (secular neutrality of the public sphere), liberty (individual autonomy and emancipation) and fraternity (civic loyalty to the community of citizens). Challenging official interpretations of laïcité, the book then puts forward a critical republicanism which does not support the hijab ban, yet upholds a revised interpretation of three central republican commitments: secularism, non-domination and civic solidarity. Thus, it articulates a version of secularism which squarely addresses the problem of status quo bias - the fact that Western societies are historically not neutral towards all religions. It also defends a vision of female emancipation which rejects the coercive paternalism inherent in the regulation of religious dress, yet does not leave individuals unaided in the face of religious and secular, patriarchal and ethnocentric domination. Finally, the book outlines a theory of immigrant integration which places the burden of civic integration on basic socio-political institutions, rather than on citizens themselves. Critical republicanism proposes an entirely new approach to the management of religious and cultural pluralism, centred on the pursuit of the progressive ideal of non-domination in existing, non-ideal societies.

In Why Tolerate Religion?, Brian Leiter argues against the special legal status of religion, claiming that religion should not be the only ground for exemptions to the law and that this form of protection should be, in principle, available for the claims of secular conscience as well. However, in the last chapter of his book, he objects to a universal regime of exemptions for both religious and secular claims of conscience, highlighting the practical and moral flaws associated with it. We believe that Leiter identifies a genuine and important contemporary legal and philosophical problem. We find much to admire in his reasoning. However, we raise questions about two claims that are crucial for his argument. The first claim is that it is not religion as such, but conscience that deserves toleration and respect. The second claim is that respect for religion and conscience demands ‘principled toleration’ but does not entail stronger policies of legal exemptions. Against the first claim, we argue that Leiter does not successfully distinguish religious belief from secular conscience and morality; and he does not explain why secular conscience deserves respect. Against the second claim, we argue that the most promising theories of legal exemptions are not classical theories of liberal toleration

The study of the reception of Rawls in Europe provides some insights into the persistence or erosion of national and European traditions of political thought since the 1970s. It notably allows us to test the relevance of the divide between `analytical' and `Continental' philosophy, and to measure the impact on political thought of the `liberal' turn of the 1980s. Reception should be seen not a process of absorption but as one of dialogue. The reception of Rawls can be approached along six axes of analysis: the themes, politics, areas, channels, temporality and geography of reception

Until now, there has been no direct and extensive engagement with the category of religion from liberal political philosophy. Over the last thirty years or so, liberals have tended to analyze religion under proximate categories such as 'conceptions of the good' or 'culture'. US constitutional lawyers and French political theorists both tackled the category of religion head-on but neither of these specialized national discourses found their way into mainstream liberal political philosophy. This is somewhat paradoxical because key liberal notions were elaborated as a response to 17th Century European Wars of Religion, and the fundamental structure of liberalism is rooted in the western experience of politico-religious conflict. So a reappraisal of this tradition - and of its validity in the light of contemporary challenges - is well overdue. This book offers the first extensive engagement with religion from liberal political philosophers. The volume analyzes, from within the liberal philosophical tradition itself, the key notions of conscience, public reason, non-establishment, and neutrality. Insofar as the contemporary religious revival is seen as posing a challenge to liberalism, it seems more crucial than ever to explore the specific resources that the liberal tradition has to answer it.

Egalitarian theories of religious freedom deny that religion is entitled to special treatment in law above and beyond that granted to comparable beliefs and practices. The most detailed and influential defense of such an approach is Christopher Eisgruber and Lawrence Sager's Religious Freedom and the Constitution (2007). In this essay I develop, elucidate, and show the limits of the strategy adopted by Eisgruber and Sager. The strategy requires that religion be analogized with other beliefs and practices according to a robust metric of comparison. I argue that Eisgruber and Sager fail to develop a consistent and coherent metric and I further suggest that this failure is symptomatic of the broader difficulty encountered by liberal theory in fitting the concept of religious freedom into a broadly egalitarian framework

In Why Tolerate Religion?, Brian Leiter argues against the special legal status of religion, claiming that religion should not be the only ground for exemptions to the law and that this form of protection should be, in principle, available for the claims of secular conscience as well. However, in the last chapter of his book, he objects to a universal regime of exemptions for both religious and secular claims of conscience, highlighting the practical and moral flaws associated with it. We believe that Leiter identifies a genuine and important contemporary legal and philosophical problem. We find much to admire in his reasoning. However, we raise questions about two claims that are crucial for his argument. The first claim is that it is not religion as such, but conscience that deserves toleration and respect. The second claim is that respect for religion and conscience demands ‘principled toleration’ but does not entail stronger policies of legal exemptions. Against the first claim, we argue that Leiter does not successfully distinguish religious belief from secular conscience and morality; and he does not explain why secular conscience deserves respect. Against the second claim, we argue that the most promising theories of legal exemptions are not classical theories of liberal toleration.