-
26Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense (review)Philosophy 81 (1): 165-170. 2006.Review of Common Sense: A Defence
-
43Richard Sorabji interviewThe Philosophers' Magazine 60 (60): 66-74. 2013.Interview with Richard Sorabji
-
69The Moral Use of TechnologyRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 61 241-260. 2007.Is technology neutral, a neutral means to whatever ends we have in mind, or is it, instead, somehow imbued with moral and political value, a kind of autonomous force which brings about its own ends? How should we think about the moral dimension of mundane technology, in particular, what is the right way to use it?
-
126Climate Change and Moral OutrageHuman Ecology Review 17 (2): 96-101. 2010.State governments have done little or nothing about climate change, and individuals have done little or nothing about their own carbon footprints. Perhaps both parties would do something if the moral demand for action were clear. This paper presents two arguments for the necessity of meaningful state action on climate change. The arguments depend on certain clear facts about emissions as well as two uncontroversial moral principles — one owed to Peter Singer and the other connecting capacities w…Read more
-
236Climate Change and Causal Inefficacy: Why Go Green When It Makes No Difference?Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69 157-174. 2011.Think of some environmentally unfriendly choices – taking the car instead of public transport or driving an SUV, just binning something recyclable, using lots of plastic bags, buying an enormous television, washing clothes in hot water, replacing something when you could make do with last year's model, heating rooms you don't use or leaving the heating high when you could put on another layer of clothing, flying for holidays, wasting food and water, eating a lot of beef, installing a patio heate…Read more
-
7The wickedness of the long hot showerThe Philosophers' Magazine 41 82-86. 2008.If it’s correct to think that the West does wrong by doing nothing despite having the room to reduce emissions and the capacity to do so, then it’s correct to think that we’re doing wrong too, in our everyday lives. Your emissions might be as much as 20 times more than others in the world; you might be doing as much as 20 times the damage to the planet compared to other people. The bulbs are not enough.
-
303What does McGinn think we cannot know?Analysis 57 (3): 196-201. 1997.Exactly what is McGinn saying when he claims that we cannot solve the mind-body problem? Just what is cognitively closed to us? The text suggests at least four possibilities. I work through each them in some detail, and I come to two principal conclusions. First, by McGinn's own understanding of the mind-body problem, he needs to show that we are cognitively closed to how brains generate consciousness, but he argues for something else, that we are cognitively closed to the brain property in virt…Read more