•  61
    The quiet American
    The Philosophers' Magazine 22 32-33. 2003.
  •  98
    Living Legends
    The Philosophers' Magazine 5 (5): 40-42. 1999.
  •  102
    The anti human rights campaigner
    with Mary Warnock
    The Philosophers' Magazine 20 25-27. 2002.
  •  64
    Stirring shit
    The Philosophers' Magazine 31 88-88. 2005.
  •  178
    Christine M. Korsgaard Interview
    The Philosophers' Magazine 58 60-69. 2012.
  •  59
    The passionate professor
    The Philosophers' Magazine 21 60-60. 2003.
  •  5
    Get them while they 're young'
    The Philosophers' Magazine 11 11-12. 2000.
  •  63
    What's the use?
    The Philosophers' Magazine 19 3-3. 2002.
  •  51
    Refuse the gift
    The Philosophers' Magazine 40 89-89. 2008.
  •  66
    Beyond the hoaxer
    The Philosophers' Magazine 41 121-126. 2008.
    I’m not trying to be strategic. I’m not a politician. I’m a physicist, an academic, and, if you want, an amateur philosopher. I’m trying to say what I think is true as clearly and unemotionally as I can, and leave it to people to judge if my arguments are right or wrong.
  •  154
    From the editor
    The Philosophers' Magazine 59 4-4. 2012.
  •  59
    What lies beyond
    The Philosophers' Magazine 31 68-70. 2005.
  •  103
  •  81
    Anglo-Saxon reserve
    The Philosophers' Magazine 43 (43): 60-66. 2008.
    There’s not only indifference, there’s actually a huge sense of sneering superiority. The need for intercultural understanding and global dialogue between different philosophical traditions and philosophical countries is so important. It’s just crazy to think that in your own monoglot culture you’ve got all the essential tools that you need to do philosophy.
  • The Lost Rewards of the Spiritual Life
    Free Inquiry 28 41-43. 2008.
  •  62
    Eating words
    The Philosophers' Magazine 20 3-3. 2002.
  •  90
    Thank you and goodbye
    The Philosophers' Magazine 24 19-21. 2003.
  •  7
    _The Ethics Toolkit_ provides an accessible and engaging compendium of concepts, theories, and strategies that encourage students and advanced readers to think critically about ethics so that they can engage intelligently in ethical study, thought, and debate. Written by the authors of the popular _The Philosophers’ Toolkit_ (Blackwell, 2001); Baggini is also a renowned print and broadcast journalist, and a prolific author of popular philosophy books Uses clear and accessible language appropriat…Read more
  •  127
    Telling stories of their lives
    The Philosophers' Magazine 7 14-15. 1999.
  •  128
    Morality as a rational requirement
    Philosophy 77 (3): 447-453. 2002.
    John Searle has recently produced an argument for strong altruism which rests on the recognition that ‘I believe my need for help is a reason for you to help me’. The argument fails to recognize the difference between ‘a reason for me for you to help me’ and ‘a reason for you for you to help me.’ These are two logically distinct types of reason and the existence of one can never therefore be enough to establish the existence of the other. The existence of this logical gap is a major obstacle for…Read more
  •  83
    The austere optimist
    The Philosophers' Magazine 47 25-33. 2009.
    If you’re thinking ethically you ought to try to take the point of view from which you consider whether you could prescribe the action if you were in the position of all of those affected by it. I think that if you consider the situation of poverty and affluence, if you were really to put yourself in the position of the poor person and the affluent person, and ask yourself whether you could support the view that the affluent person doesn’t give anything to the poor, you couldn’t.
  •  93
    Dennett’s dangerous ideas
    The Philosophers' Magazine 30 52-56. 2005.
  •  107
    The populist threat to pluralism
    Philosophy and Social Criticism 41 (4-5): 403-412. 2015.
    Although political pluralism can have an ethical justification, it does not need one. Political pluralism can be justified on the basis of an epistemological argument about what we can claim to know, one which has a normative conclusion about how strongly we ought to believe. This is important because for pluralism to command wide assent, it needs something other than an ethical justification, since many simply will not accept that justification. Thus understood, we can see that current threats …Read more
  •  57
    It's not for everyone
    The Philosophers' Magazine 15 3-3. 2001.
  •  131
    A brief word about liberals and dummies (review)
    with Salam Hawa
    The Philosophers' Magazine 9 (9): 56-56. 2000.
  •  79
    Strange goings on down at the farm
    The Philosophers' Magazine 38 18-20. 2007.
  •  70
    Bush whacker
    The Philosophers' Magazine 27 57-57. 2004.
  •  96
    God’s artillery opens fire
    The Philosophers' Magazine 2012 (60): 118-119. 2013.
  •  64
    Why the free will debate never ends
    The Philosophers' Magazine 69 35-43. 2015.