•  505
    Metaphysics and the morality of abortion
    Mind 108 (432): 619-646. 1999.
    Conclusions about the morality of abortion have been thought to receive some support from metaphysical doctrines about persons. The paper studies four instances in which philosophers have sought to draw such morals from metaphysics. It argues that in each instance the metaphysics makes no moral difference, and the manner of failure seems indicative of a general epistemic irrelevance of metaphysics to the moral issue.
  •  797
    The generality problem for reliabilism
    with E. Conee and R. Feldman
    Philosophical Studies 89 (1): 1-29. 1998.
  •  156
    Good to know
    Philosophical Studies 174 (2): 311-331. 2017.
    Our curiosity has us interested in finding out the truth. Knowing the fact of the matter fulfills the interest. This fulfillment is something satisfying about knowledge. Additionally, knowledge is a good way for a person to relate to a proposition. Knowing is good because of what knowledge is. In other words, knowledge is intrinsically good. The credibility of these assessments calls for some explanation. A traditional view is that knowledge is justified true belief with no Gettier accidents. Th…Read more
  •  79
    Supervenience and intentionality
    In Elias E. Savellos & Ümit D. Yalçin (eds.), Supervenience: New Essays, Cambridge University Press. 1995.
  •  59
    Epistemology (review)
    Review of Metaphysics 61 (1): 134-135. 2007.
  •  5
    Replies
    In Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and its Discontents, Oxford University Press. 2011.
  •  324
    Against moral dilemmas
    Philosophical Review 91 (1): 87-97. 1982.
    E j lemmon, B a o williams, Bas van fraassen, And ruth marcus have argued on behalf of the existence of moral dilemmas, I.E., Cases where an agent is subject to conflicting absolute moral obligations. The paper criticizes this support and contends that no moral dilemma is possible.