profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Sara Bernstein

University of California, Santa Cruz
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    18
  •  News and Updates
    49

 More details
  • University of California, Santa Cruz
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
  • University of California, Santa Cruz
    Professor
University of Arizona
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2010
APA Western Division
CV
Homepage
Santa Cruz, California, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Counterfactual Theories of Causation
Theories of Causation
Causation in the Law
Time Travel
Intersectionality
1 more
Areas of Interest
Moral Responsibility, Misc
Philosophy of Law
Feminist Philosophy
PhilPapers Editorships
Varieties of Causation
The Direction of Causation
Causal Overdetermination
Causal Preemption
Causation by Absences
Downward Causation
Probabilistic Causation
Varieties of Causation, Misc
3 more
  • All publications (35)
  •  92
    Review of Sophie Gibb, E. J. Lowe, and R. D. Ingthorsson (eds.), Mental Causation and Ontology (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2013 (1): 1. 2013.
    Mental Causation, MiscMetaphysics of Mind, Misc
  •  1759
    Causal and Moral Indeterminacy
    Ratio 29 (4): 434-447. 2016.
    This paper argues that several sorts of metaphysical and semantic indeterminacy afflict the causal relation. If, as it is plausible to hold, there is a relationship between causation and moral responsibility, then indeterminacy in the causal relation results in indeterminacy of moral responsibility more generally.
    Indeterminacy and Legal ReasoningThe Open FutureMetaphysical IndeterminacyIndeterminacy, MiscCausati…Read more
    Indeterminacy and Legal ReasoningThe Open FutureMetaphysical IndeterminacyIndeterminacy, MiscCausation by Absences
  •  466
    The Metaphysics of Omissions
    Philosophy Compass 10 (3): 208-218. 2015.
    Omissions – any events, actions, or things that do not occur – are central to numerous debates in causation and ethics. This article surveys views on what omissions are, whether they are causally efficacious, and how they ground moral responsibility.
    Causation by AbsencesTheories of Causation, MiscCounterfactual Theories of CausationCausal Accounts …Read more
    Causation by AbsencesTheories of Causation, MiscCounterfactual Theories of CausationCausal Accounts of ExplanationOmissions
  •  2107
    Omissions as possibilities
    Philosophical Studies 167 (1): 1-23. 2014.
    I present and develop the view that omissions are de re possibilities of actual events. Omissions do not literally fail to occur; rather, they possibly occur. An omission is a tripartite metaphysical entity composed of an actual event, a possible event, and a contextually specified counterpart relation between them. This view resolves ontological, causal, and semantic puzzles about omissions, and also accounts for important data about moral responsibility for outcomes resulting from omissions.
    Causation by AbsencesOmissions
  •  3545
    Time Travel and the Movable Present
    In John Christopher Adorno (ed.), Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen, . pp. 80-94. 2017.
    In "Changing the Past" (2010), Peter van Inwagen argues that a time traveler can change the past without paradox in a growing block universe. After erasing the portion of past existence that generates paradox, a new, non-paradox-generating block can be "grown" after the temporal relocation of the time traveler. I articulate and explore the underlying mechanism of Van Inwagen's model: the time traveler's control over the location of the objective present. Van Inwagen's model is aimed at preventin…Read more
    In "Changing the Past" (2010), Peter van Inwagen argues that a time traveler can change the past without paradox in a growing block universe. After erasing the portion of past existence that generates paradox, a new, non-paradox-generating block can be "grown" after the temporal relocation of the time traveler. I articulate and explore the underlying mechanism of Van Inwagen's model: the time traveler's control over the location of the objective present. Van Inwagen's model is aimed at preventing paradox by changing the past, but it achieves something broader than paradox avoidance: it gives tools for a new model of time travel. I use van Inwagen's tools to develop a new kind of time travel in which in which the location of the objective present is shifted by the time traveler. I call this type of time travel Movable Objective Present, or MOP. After defining MOP, I argue that it is compatible with any theory of time that accepts hypertime, including presentism and moving spotlight theory.
    Time TravelPhilosophy of Time, MiscPresentismTemporal Ontology, MiscGrowing Block Views
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University