• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Frank Chouraqui

Leiden University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    10

 More details
  • Leiden University
    Institute for Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of Warwick
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2010
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Religion
Aesthetics
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
  • All publications (35)
  •  206
    Merleau-Ponty and the Order of the Earth
    Research in Phenomenology 46 (1): 54-69. 2016.
    _ Source: _Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 54 - 69 In this essay, I reconstruct Merleau-Ponty’s implicit critique of Husserl in his lectures on Husserl’s concept of the earth as _Boden_ or ground. Against Husserl, Merleau-Ponty regards the earth seen as pure _Boden_ as an idealization. He emphasizes the ontological necessity for the earth as _Boden_ to always hypostasize itself into the Copernican concept of earth as object. In turn, Merleau-Ponty builds this necessity into an essential feature of being,…Read more
    _ Source: _Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 54 - 69 In this essay, I reconstruct Merleau-Ponty’s implicit critique of Husserl in his lectures on Husserl’s concept of the earth as _Boden_ or ground. Against Husserl, Merleau-Ponty regards the earth seen as pure _Boden_ as an idealization. He emphasizes the ontological necessity for the earth as _Boden_ to always hypostasize itself into the Copernican concept of earth as object. In turn, Merleau-Ponty builds this necessity into an essential feature of being, allowing himself to retrieve ontology itself from its status as external to being, and to make room for it within the structure of being: ontology is one of the ways in which experiences become objectified, thereby allowing being to achieve its essential movement of hypostatization.
    Maurice Merleau-PontyHusserl and Continental Philosophers, Misc20th Century French Philosophy, MiscH…Read more
    Maurice Merleau-PontyHusserl and Continental Philosophers, Misc20th Century French Philosophy, MiscHusserl: OntologyEvents
  •  111
    Originary Dehiscence: An Invitation to Explore the Resonances Between the Philosophies of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty
    In Élodie Boublil & Christine Daigle (eds.), Nietzsche and Phenomenology: Power, Life, Subjectivity, Indiana University Press. pp. 177-194. 2013.
    This paper seeks to provide a basis for a fruitful correspondence between the projects of Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty. It argues that both philosophers are committed to an ontology of relation and they both regards any terms to these relations as being hypostases of a horizontal movement. This commits them to very parallel views of history, politics, and perception.
    Nietzsche: Will to PowerMaurice Merleau-PontyNietzsche: Metaphysics and Epistemology, MiscNietzsche:…Read more
    Nietzsche: Will to PowerMaurice Merleau-PontyNietzsche: Metaphysics and Epistemology, MiscNietzsche: Time, Being and BecomingNietzsche: Metaphysics, Misc
  •  53
    Eran Dorfman: Foundations of the everyday, shock, deferral, repetition: Rowman and Littlefield, London, 2014, 207 pp
    Continental Philosophy Review 49 (2): 259-265. 2016.
    Gilles Deleuze
  •  73
    Nietzsche on Mind and Nature
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2): 428-432. 2017.
    Friedrich Nietzsche
  •  59
    “A Principle of Universal Strife”: Ricoeur and Merleau-Ponty’s Critiques of Marxist Universalism, 1953–1956
    Journal of the History of Ideas 76 (3): 467-490. 2015.
    This paper seeks to address two lacunae of the literature about French political theory in the second half of the 20th century. The first concerns the origins of the great Foucaldian thesis of the autonomy of power, and the second concerns the conceptual implications of the events of the 1950s surrounding the politics of communism on both sides of the Iron Curtain. There are many apparent responses to these questions in the existing literature. However, they are rendered insufficient by their re…Read more
    This paper seeks to address two lacunae of the literature about French political theory in the second half of the 20th century. The first concerns the origins of the great Foucaldian thesis of the autonomy of power, and the second concerns the conceptual implications of the events of the 1950s surrounding the politics of communism on both sides of the Iron Curtain. There are many apparent responses to these questions in the existing literature. However, they are rendered insufficient by their refusal to address the need for a specifically intellectual history. With regard to Foucault’s thesis of the autonomy of power, philosophers seem happy to abstract Foucault’s insight from its context, resting on the implication that it may have come out of nowhere. Conversely, when it comes to the implications of historical developments on political philosophy, historians seem to satisfy themselves with wordplay: before so many histories of the intellectuals, who needs intellectual history? It is however rather obvious that both history and philosophy are set to benefit from a specifically intellectual history, that is to say, from an account neither of an idea nor of a context, but of how the historical context of the early fifties made the Foucaldian idea conceivable.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback