• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Richard Taylor

Marquette University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    96
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    5

 More details
  • Marquette University
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Toronto, St. George Campus
Graduate Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1982
Homepage
Areas of Interest
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
  • All publications (96)
  •  92
    Averroes' Epistemology and its Critique by Aquinas
    Thomas Aquinas
  •  163
    The Agent Intellect as “form for us” and Averroes’s Critique of al-F'r'bî
    Tópicos 29 29-52. 2005.
    This article explicates Averroes's understanding of human knowing and abstraction in this three commentaries on Aristotle's De Anima. While Averroes's views on the nature of the human material intellect changes through the three commentaries until he reaches is famous view of the unity of the material intellect as one for all human beings, his view of the agent intellect as 'form for us' is sustained throughout these works. In his Long Commentary on the De Anima he reveals his dependence on al-F…Read more
    This article explicates Averroes's understanding of human knowing and abstraction in this three commentaries on Aristotle's De Anima. While Averroes's views on the nature of the human material intellect changes through the three commentaries until he reaches is famous view of the unity of the material intellect as one for all human beings, his view of the agent intellect as 'form for us' is sustained throughout these works. In his Long Commentary on the De Anima he reveals his dependence on al-Fârâbî for this notion and provides a detailed critique of the Farabian notion that the agent intellect is 'form for us' only as agent cause, not as our true formal cause. Although Averroes argues that the agent intellect must somehow be intrinsic to us as our form since humans are per se rational and undertake acts of knowing by will, his view is shown to rest on an equivocal use of the notion of formal cause. The agent intellect cannot be properly our intrinsic formal principle while remaining ontologically separate.
    AverroesAristotle: Active/Passive Intellect
  •  77
    Improving on Nature's Exemplar: Averroes' Completion of Aristotle's Psychology of Intellect
  •  93
    Averroes on the Ontology of the Human Soul
    Averroes
  •  69
    Aquinas and 'the Arabs': Aquinas's First Critical Encounter with the Doctrines of Avicenna and Averroes on the Intellect, IN 2 SENT. D. 17, Q. 2, A.1
    Thomas Aquinas
  •  43
    Joan Kung 1938 - 1987
    with Michael Wreen
    Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (5). 1987.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback