-
63Arguments that BackfireIn D. Hitchcock & D. Farr (eds.), The Uses of Argument, Ossa. pp. 58-65. 2005.One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audiences – is a transfer of credibility from premises to conclusions. From a purely logical perspective, neither dubious premises nor fallacious inference should lower the credibility of the target conclusion. Nevertheless, some arguments do backfire this way. Dialectical and rhetorical considerations come into play. Three inter-related conclusions emerge from a catalogue of hapless arguers and backfi…Read more
-
52A new axiomatization of Belnap's conditional assertionNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (1): 124-132. 1986.
-
21A complex network of reciprocal relations connect arguments and stories. Arguments can occur in stories and stories can be parts of arguments. Further, stories can themselves be arguments. Whether a text or exchange serves as an argument partly depe nds on how we read it, i.e., on the story we tell about it and how well we argue for that story, but the circle is not as vicious as it appears. Or at least, that is the story we present and the argument we tell in this dialogue revisiting the ancien…Read more
-
32Commentary on: Katharina von Radziewsky's "The virtuous arguer: One person, four characters"In Dima Mohammed & Marcin Lewinski (eds.), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 22–25, 2013, Ossa. 2014.N/A.
-
1Review: Robert K. Meyer, Georg Dorn, P. Weingartner, A Farewell to Entailment (review)Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (1): 352-353. 1990.
-
28Fogelin's Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal by Robert FogelinInformal Logic 23 (1). 2003.
-
50Psychological and neuroscientific data suggest that a great deal, perhaps even most, of our reasoning turns out to be rationalizing. The reasons we give for our positions are seldom either the real reasons or the effective causes of why we have those positions. We are not as rational as we like to think. A second, no less disheartening observation is that while we may be very effective when it comes to giving reasons, we are not that good at getting reasons. We are not as reasons-responsive as w…Read more
-
17Schoolhouses, Jailhouses and the House of Being: The Tragedy of Philosophy’s MetaphorsMetaphilosophy 29 (1‐2): 6-19. 1998.As a rule, there is nothing in the words themselves to mark off metaphors from literal language. If a boundary could somehow be drawn, it would be in constant need of re‐adjustment as metaphors become entrenched, idiomatic, and finally literal, and literal phrases are put to figurative or hyperbolic, and then metaphorical uses. Further, there is no algorithmic recovery of the intended meaning of a metaphor from the meanings of its components, no function that takes literal meanings as its argume…Read more
-
156Argument is War... And War is Hell: Philosophy, Education, and Metaphors for ArgumentationInformal Logic 17 (2): 177-188. 1995.The claim that argumentation has no proper role in either philosophy or education, and especially not in philosophical education, flies in the face of both conventional wisdom and traditional pedagogy. There is, however, something to be said for it because it is really only provocative against a certain philosophical backdrop. Our understanding of the concept "argument" is both reflected by and molded by the specific metaphor that argument-is-war, something with winners and losers, offensive and…Read more
-
50Paul Boghossian - Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and ConstructivismInformal Logic 27 (2): 229-232. 2007.Paul Boghossian’s recent book, Fear of Knowledge offers an extended argument against some forms of contemporary anti-realism and, by implication, an argument for realism. The intended audience is philosophers with metaphysical and epistemological interests, argumentation theorists might be most engaged by it because while the book is flawed as an argument, it makes a positive contribution when read as a discourse about argument. The main flaw is the uncharitable readings of Kuhn, Rorty, and Lat…Read more
-
55Virtue Epistemology and Argumentation TheoryIn David Hitchcock (ed.), Dissensus and the search for common ground, Ossa. 2007.Virtue epistemology was modeled on virtue ethics theories to transfer their ethical insights to epistemology. VE has had great success: broadening our perspective, providing new answers to traditional questions, and raising exciting new questions. I offer a new argument for VE based on the concept of cognitive achievements, a broader notion than purely epistemic achievements. The argument is then extended to cognitive transformations, especially the cognitive transformations brought about by arg…Read more
-
19Review: Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer, Ross T. Brady, Relevant Logics and their Rivals. Part I. The Basic Philosophical and Semantical Theory (review)Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1): 293-296. 1989.
Waterville, Maine, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics and Epistemology |
Philosophy, Misc |
Areas of Interest
Epistemology |
Philosophy of Language |
Metaphysics and Epistemology |
Philosophy, Misc |