• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Lorenzo Greco

Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    98
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    3
  •  News and Updates
    78

 More details
  • Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
    Department of Human Sciences
    Regular Faculty
University of Pisa
PhD, 2003
Email (login required)
Homepage
Italy
Areas of Specialization
David Hume
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Social and Political Philosophy
Normative Ethics
Moral Psychology
Meta-Ethics
1 more
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Mind
Applied Ethics
20th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (98)
  •  16
    Philippa Foot, Virtù e vizi (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2008). (review)
    Rivista di Filosofia 100 (3): 441-43. 2009.
    Virtues and Vices
  •  24
    Carmelo Vigna (ed.), Introduzione all'etica (Milano: Vita e Pensiero, 2001) (review)
    Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 15 (37): 676-78. 2002.
    Value Theory
  •  30
    Matteo Galletti, Silvia Vida (eds.), Indagine sulla natura umana. Itinerari della filosofia contemporanea (Roma: Carocci, 2011). (review)
    Rivista di Filosofia 104 (1): 155-56. 2013.
  •  42
    Sidgwick e il fallimento dell’etica scientifica. Commento a Cremaschi
    Etica E Politica 8 (1): 1-5. 2006.
    Henry Sidgwick
  •  21
    Bernard Williams, Il senso del passato (Milano: Feltrinelli, 2009). (review)
    Rivista di Filosofia 102 (1): 166-68. 2011.
  •  50
    L’identità personale in David Hume: dalle passioni all’etica
    Thaumàzein 2 247-64. 2014.
    Personal Identity and ValuesHume: Value TheoryHume: Philosophy of Mind
  •  174
    Hume e l'etica della virtù
    Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 25 (67): 603-15. 2012.
    In this paper, I present some reasons in favour of an interpretation of Hume’s moral philosophy as a brand new form of "virtue ethics." By discussing some specific issues within the secondary literature in favour and against this kind of reading, I argue that Hume offers better philosophical tools to redefine the basic notion of virtue ethics than the neo-Aristotelian alternative. In particular, I maintain that the strength of Hume’s proposal lies in its pointing toward the unity of character in…Read more
    In this paper, I present some reasons in favour of an interpretation of Hume’s moral philosophy as a brand new form of "virtue ethics." By discussing some specific issues within the secondary literature in favour and against this kind of reading, I argue that Hume offers better philosophical tools to redefine the basic notion of virtue ethics than the neo-Aristotelian alternative. In particular, I maintain that the strength of Hume’s proposal lies in its pointing toward the unity of character instead of the unity of the virtues. This allows Hume to develop a nonfinalistic, secular and pluralistic morality in which the individuality of people is seen as a central value to be promoted.
    Hume: Virtue EthicsPluralistic Virtue EthicsVirtues and VicesSentimentalist Virtue EthicsHume: Virtu…Read more
    Hume: Virtue EthicsPluralistic Virtue EthicsVirtues and VicesSentimentalist Virtue EthicsHume: Virtues and VicesVarieties of Virtue Ethics, Misc
  •  39
    L’etica analitica dal punto di vista del soggetto
    with Piergiorgio Donatelli
    In Annalisa Coliva (ed.), Filosofia analitica: temi e problemi, Carocci. pp. 331-50. 2007.
    Ethics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback