• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Guy Politzer

Institut Jean Nicod
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    31
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    9

 More details
  • Institut Jean Nicod
    Researcher
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Language
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
  • All publications (31)
  •  204
    No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3): 298-299. 2003.
    It is argued that, in the traditional subject-predicate sentence, two interpretations of the subject term coexist, one intensional and the other extensional, which explains the superficial difference between the traditional S-P relation and the predication of predicate logic. Data from psychological studies of syllogistic reasoning support the view that the contrast between predicate and argument is carried over to the traditional S-P sentence.
    Aristotelian LogicPredicate LogicExperimental Philosophy of Language, MiscSemantics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback