-
108Divine Action and the Quantum Amplification ProblemTheology and Science 13 (4): 379-394. 2015.For quantum mechanics to form the crux of a robust model of divine action, random quantum fluctuations must be amplified into the macroscopic realm. What has not been recognized in the divine action literature to date is the degree to which differential dynamics, continuum mechanics, and condensed matter physics prevent such fluctuations from infecting meso- and macroscopic systems. Once all of the relevant physics is considered, models of divine action based on quantum randomness are shown to b…Read more
-
180Models, confirmation, and chaosPhilosophy of Science 65 (4): 624-648. 1998.The use of idealized models in science is by now well-documented. Such models are typically constructed in a “top-down” fashion: starting with an intractable theory or law and working down toward the phenomenon. This view of model-building has motivated a family of confirmation schemes based on the convergence of prediction and observation. This paper considers how chaotic dynamics blocks the convergence view of confirmation and has forced experimentalists to take a different approach to mod…Read more
-
139The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of ScienceWiley-Blackwell. 2015.Theologians and philosophers of religion are increasingly interested in physics. From the fine-tuning of universal constants to quantum mechanics, relativity, and cosmology, physics is a surprisingly common subject where religion is involved. Bridging the gap between issues in religion and those in physics can be quite difficult, however. Fortunately, the philosophy of science provides a middle ground between the two disciplines. In this book, a philosopher of science provides a critical ana…Read more
-
425Has chaos been explained?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (4): 683-700. 2001.In his recent book, Explaining Chaos, Peter Smith presents a new problem in the foundations of chaos theory. Specifically, he argues that the standard ways of justifying idealizations in mathematical models fail when it comes to the infinite intricacy found in strange attractors. I argue that Smith's analysis undermines much of the explanatory power of chaos theory. A better approach is developed by drawing analogies from the models found in continuum mechanics.
University Center, Michigan, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
| Philosophy of Physical Science |
| Philosophy of Religion |
Areas of Interest
| General Philosophy of Science |