-
84Vicarious Apologies as Moral RepairRatio 30 (3): 359-373. 2017.Apologies are key components of moral repair. They can identify a wrong, express regret, and accept culpability for some transgression. Apologies can vindicate a victim's value as someone who was due different treatment. This paper explores whether acts with vicarious elements may serve as apologies. I offer a functionalist account of apologies: acts are apologies not so much by having correct ingredients but by serving certain apologetic functions. Those functions can be realized in multiple wa…Read more
-
18Examining the Bonds and Bounds of FriendshipDialogue 42 (2): 321-344. 2003.RésuméLes propriétés dynamiques de l'amitié requièrent parfois que les amis réévaluent leur relation à la lumière de raisons de réciprocité ou de considérations morales. Les amis maintiennent leur relation en partie en évaluant leurs rapports de réciprocité. Ils doivent aussi considérer parfois l'impact de raisons morales sur leur amidé; il leur faut résoudre d'occasionnelles tensions entre les exigences de l'amitié et certaines considérations rivales d'ordre moral, et ils doivent agir parfois c…Read more
-
76On the Possibility of Corporate ApologiesJournal of Moral Philosophy 10 (6): 741-762. 2013.This paper argues against an individualist challenge to the possibility of corporate apologies. According to this challenge, corporations always and only act through their members; thus they are not the sorts of entities that can apologize. Consequently there can be no corporate apologies. Against this challenge, this paper argues that even if corporate acts can be analyzed as acts by individuals within certain relationships, there can still be corporate apologies. This paper offers a nonelimina…Read more
-
92Contractarianism, other-regarding attitudes, and the moral standing of nonhuman animalsJournal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2). 2007.abstract Contractarianism roots moral standing in an agreement among rational agents in the circumstances of justice. Critics have argued that the theory must exclude nonhuman animals from the protection of justice. I argue that contractarianism can consistently accommodate the notion that nonhuman animals are owed direct moral consideration. They can acquire their moral status indirectly, but their claims to justice can be as stringent as those among able‐bodied rational adult humans. Any remai…Read more
-
93Warmongers, Martyrs, and Madmen versus the Hobbesian Laws of NatureCanadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (4). 2002.I focus particularly on the case of the glory seekers. Driven by a foolhardy overestimation of their worth, seekers of glory do not value peace as others do. They may not even value peace at all. Their quest for glory then often obstructs peace, which is perhaps why Hobbes condemns vainglory as irrational. But once we clarify what it is that glory seekers seek, it becomes uncertain that gratifying appetites for glory is necessarily against right reason. If Hobbes is then to say that the laws of …Read more
-
Hobbesian Political Authority and the Right of ResistanceDissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 1994.Besides commanding coercive power, a political authority is supposed to offer directives which ought to exclude private judgment. Any defense of inalienable rights or limited rights of resistance suggests some legitimate residual private judgment. Such retained rights threaten to undermine the binding force of authoritative directives. ;The case of Hobbesian sovereignty typifies this problem. Hobbes claims agents must establish permanent and absolute political authorities, and they can do so onl…Read more
-
46Virtues, Opportunities, and the Right To Do WrongJournal of Social Philosophy 28 (2): 43-55. 1997.
Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Applied Ethics |
Normative Ethics |
Social and Political Philosophy |
Areas of Interest
Meta-Ethics |
Philosophy of Law |
History of Western Philosophy |