• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Kieran Setiya

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    80
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    16
  •  News and Updates
    82

 More details
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
    Professor
Princeton University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2002
Homepage
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Epistemology
Philosophy of Action
Meta-Ethics
Normative Ethics
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (80)
  •  89
    Review of Roger Scruton, 'On Human Nature' (review)
    Times Literary Supplement. 2017.
  •  44
    Review of Alva Noe, 'Strange Tools' (review)
    Times Literary Supplement 2016. 2016.
  •  279
    Johnston, Mark. Saving God: Religion after Idolatry.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009. Pp. 248. $24.95 .Johnston, Mark. Surviving Death.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2010. Pp. 408. $35.00
    Ethics 121 (2): 476-486. 2011.
    Value TheoryThe Number of Gods
  •  272
    Ignorance, Beneficence, and Rights
    Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (1): 56-74. 2020.
    I argue that ignorance of who will die makes a difference to the ethics of killing. It follows that reasons are subject to ‘specificity’: it can be rational to respond more strongly to facts that provide us with reasons than to the fact that such reasons exist. In the case of killing and letting die, these reasons are distinctively particular: they turn on personal acquaintance. The theory of rights must be, in part, a theory of this relation.
    The Analysis of RightsEmmanuel LevinasAggregation and ConsequentialismBeneficence in Applied EthicsR…Read more
    The Analysis of RightsEmmanuel LevinasAggregation and ConsequentialismBeneficence in Applied EthicsReasons and RationalityThe Trolley Problem
  •  683
    Must Consequentialists Kill?
    Journal of Philosophy 115 (2): 92-105. 2018.
    Argues that the ethics of killing and saving lives is best described by agent-neutral consequentialism, not by appeal to agent-centred restrictions. It does not follow that killings are worse than accidental deaths or that you should kill one to prevent more killings. The upshot is a puzzle about killing and letting die.
    AxiologyThe Trolley ProblemIntransitivity of ValueConsequentialism, MiscDeontological Moral Theories…Read more
    AxiologyThe Trolley ProblemIntransitivity of ValueConsequentialism, MiscDeontological Moral Theories, Misc
  •  128
    Midlife: A Philosophical Guide
    Princeton University Press. 2017.
    Philosophical wisdom and practical advice for overcoming the problems of middle age How can you reconcile yourself with the lives you will never lead, with possibilities foreclosed, and with nostalgia for lost youth? How can you accept the failings of the past, the sense of futility in the tasks that consume the present, and the prospect of death that blights the future? In this self-help book with a difference, Kieran Setiya confronts the inevitable challenges of adulthood and middle age, showi…Read more
    Philosophical wisdom and practical advice for overcoming the problems of middle age How can you reconcile yourself with the lives you will never lead, with possibilities foreclosed, and with nostalgia for lost youth? How can you accept the failings of the past, the sense of futility in the tasks that consume the present, and the prospect of death that blights the future? In this self-help book with a difference, Kieran Setiya confronts the inevitable challenges of adulthood and middle age, showing how philosophy can help you thrive. You will learn why missing out might be a good thing, how options are overrated, and when you should be glad you made a mistake. You will be introduced to philosophical consolations for mortality. And you will learn what it would mean to live in the present, how it could solve your midlife crisis, and why meditation helps. Ranging from Aristotle, Schopenhauer, and John Stuart Mill to Virginia Woolf and Simone de Beauvoir, as well as drawing on Setiya’s own experience, Midlife combines imaginative ideas, surprising insights, and practical advice. Writing with wisdom and wit, Setiya makes a wry but passionate case for philosophy as a guide to life.
    AxiologyIncommensurability of ValueWell-Being, MiscHappinessThe Badness of DeathValue Pluralism
  •  250
    Reasons without Rationalism
    Princeton University Press. 2007.
    Modern philosophy has been vexed by the question "Why should I be moral?" and by doubts about the rational authority of moral virtue. In Reasons without Rationalism, Kieran Setiya shows that these doubts rest on a mistake. The "should" of practical reason cannot be understood apart from the virtues of character, including such moral virtues as justice and benevolence, and the considerations to which the virtues make one sensitive thereby count as reasons to act. Proposing a new framework for deb…Read more
    Modern philosophy has been vexed by the question "Why should I be moral?" and by doubts about the rational authority of moral virtue. In Reasons without Rationalism, Kieran Setiya shows that these doubts rest on a mistake. The "should" of practical reason cannot be understood apart from the virtues of character, including such moral virtues as justice and benevolence, and the considerations to which the virtues make one sensitive thereby count as reasons to act. Proposing a new framework for debates about practical reason, Setiya argues that the only alternative to this "virtue theory" is a form of ethical rationalism in which reasons derive from the nature of intentional action. Despite its recent popularity, however, ethical rationalism is false. It wrongly assumes that we act "under the guise of the good," or it relies on dubious views about intention and motivation. It follows from the failure of rationalism that the virtue theory is true: we cannot be fully good without the perfection of practical reason, or have that perfection without being good. Addressing such topics as the psychology of virtue and the explanation of action, Reasons without Rationalism is essential reading for philosophers interested in ethics, rationality, or the philosophy of mind.
    The Structure of ActionVirtue Ethics, MiscPractical Reason, MiscReasonsKnowledge of Action
  •  154
    Broome on Reasons to Act
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1): 204-210. 2015.
    Ethics
  •  258
    Selfish Reasons
    Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2. 2015.
    Argues against the rationality of self-concern. Non-instrumental interest in my own well-being is not justified by the fact that it is mine. This follows from the metaphysics of first-person thought, as thought about the object of immediate knowledge. The argument leaves room for rational self-interest as a form of self-love that is justified, like love for others, by the fact of our shared humanity.
    Personal Identity, MiscWhat Matters in SurvivalFirst-Person Contents
  •  814
    Love and the Value of a Life
    Philosophical Review 123 (3): 251-280. 2014.
    Argues that there is no one it is irrational to love, that it is rational to act with partiality to those we love, and that the rationality of doing so is not conditional on love. It follows that Anscombe and Taurek are right: you are not required to save three instead of one, even when those you could save are perfect strangers
    Aggregation and ConsequentialismIncommensurability of ValuePhilosophy of Love, Misc
  •  299
    Reasons without rationalism * by Kieran Setiya * princeton university press, 2007. IX + 131 pp. 22.50: Summary
    Analysis 69 (3): 509-510. 2009.
    Reasons without Rationalism has two related parts, devoted to action theory and ethics, respectively. In the second part, I argue for a close connection between reasons for action and virtues of character. This connection is mediated by the idea of good practical thought and the disposition to engage in it. The argument relies on the following principle, which is intended as common ground: " Reasons: The fact that p is a reason for A to ϕ just in case A has a collection of psychological states, …Read more
    Reasons without Rationalism has two related parts, devoted to action theory and ethics, respectively. In the second part, I argue for a close connection between reasons for action and virtues of character. This connection is mediated by the idea of good practical thought and the disposition to engage in it. The argument relies on the following principle, which is intended as common ground: " Reasons: The fact that p is a reason for A to ϕ just in case A has a collection of psychological states, C, such that the disposition to be moved to ϕ by C-and-the-belief-that- p is a good disposition of practical thought, and C contains no false beliefs."In effect, reasons are premises for episodes of sound practical thinking whose other conditions already …
    Reasons and RationalitySubjective and Objective Reasons
  •  253
    Akrasia and the Constitution of Agency
    In Practical Knowledge: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press. 2016.
    Argues that we do not act intentionally ‘under the guise of the good.’ This makes it hard to explain why akrasia is distinctively irrational; but this is no objection, since it is just as hard to explain on the opposing view. Ends with a problem of akrasia for ethical rationalists.
    The Structure of ActionWeakness of WillPratical Reason, Misc
  •  692
    Practical knowledge
    Ethics 118 (3): 388-409. 2008.
    Argues that we know without observation or inference at least some of what we are doing intentionally and that this possibility must be explained in terms of knowledge-how. It is a consequence of the argument that knowing how to do something cannot be identified with knowledge of a proposition.
    Knowledge HowIntentionsIntentional Action
  •  257
    Hume on practical reason
    Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1). 2004.
    Argues that Hume was a sceptic about practical reason only on a rationalist account of what it would have to be. (This version differs substantially from the published paper.).
    Inductive SkepticismHume: Philosophy of ActionInstrumental ReasoningPractical and Theoretical Reason…Read more
    Inductive SkepticismHume: Philosophy of ActionInstrumental ReasoningPractical and Theoretical ReasoningDeliberation
  •  134
    Wrong-Making Reasons
    In Martina Herrmann (ed.), Reading Parfit, Springer Netherlands. pp. 123-134. 1998.
    Argues that there is a problem of redundancy for Kantian Contractualism in light of plausible claims about the reason-giving force of wrong-making facts.
    Moral ContractualismArguments for ConsequentialismReasons, MiscReasons and Oughts
  •  284
    Retrospection
    Philosophers' Imprint 16. 2016.
    Argues from the rationality of nostalgia, affirmation, and regret to a principle of ‘specificity’: it can be rational to respond more strongly to facts that provide us with reasons than to the fact that such reasons exist.
    Reasons and OughtsReasons and RationalityValue PluralismIncommensurability of Value
  •  414
    Internal Reasons
    In Internal Reasons. 2012.
    Argues that "internalism about reasons" owes its appeal to a function argument from the nature of agency. Internalism is thus revealed as a species of ethical rationalism. (This paper introduces a volume of recent work on internal and external reasons.)
    Internalism and Externalism about Reasons
  •  86
    Review of Sergio Tenenbaum, 'Appearances of the Good' (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (5). 2007.
    Desire and MotivationDesire and ReasonMoral Motivation
  •  241
    Intention, Plans, and Ethical Rationalism
    In Manuel Vargas & Gideon Yaffe (eds.), Rational and Social Agency: The Philosophy of Michael Bratman, Oxford University Press. pp. 56-82. 2014.
    Argues from the planning theory of intention – as an account of means-end coherence – to a comprehensive form of ethical rationalism. Having raised objections to this result, the paper ends by sketching a way out.
    Intentions, Misc
  •  387
    Causality in Action
    Analysis 73 (3): 501-512. 2013.
    Action Theory
  •  177
    The Ethics of Existence
    Philosophical Perspectives 28 (1): 291-301. 2014.
    Argues that inadvisable procreative acts should often be affirmed in retrospect. This shift is not explained by attachment or love but by the moral impact of existence.
    Philosophy of Love, MiscMoral Phenomena, Misc
  •  350
    Murdoch on the Sovereignty of Good
    Philosophers' Imprint 13. 2013.
    Argues for an interpretation of Iris Murdoch on which her account of moral reasons has Platonic roots, and on which she gives an ontological proof of the reality of the Good. This reading explains the structure of Sovereignty, how Murdoch's claims differ from a focus on "thick moral concepts," and how to find coherent arguments in her book.
    Internalism and Externalism about ReasonsMoral ReasonsMoral MotivationIris Murdoch
  •  427
    Sympathy for the devil
    In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, Oxford University Press. pp. 82--110. 2010.
    Argues that, while human beings may act "under the guise of the good," this is not true of rational agents, as such. Themes discussed along the way – extending the argument of "Reasons without Rationalism" (Princeton, 2007) – include: desires as appearances of the good, the intelligibility of vice, and the kind of essentialist claim that permits exceptions.
    The Structure of ActionEmpathy and Sympathy
  •  451
    Anscombe on Practical Knowledge
    In Practical Knowledge: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press. 2016.
    Argues that, for Anscombe, 'practical knowledge' is only sometimes 'the cause of what it understands.' It is the formal cause when its object is 'formally the description of an executed intention.' Nor is such knowledge confined to the present progressive: we have practical knowledge of the future and the past.
    Intentional ActionIntentions, MiscKnowledge of Action
  •  124
    Practical Knowledge: Selected Essays
    Oxford University Press. 2016.
    In this collection, Kieran Setiya explores the place of agency in ethics, arguing for a causal theory of intentional action on which it is understood through the knowledge embodied in our intentions, and against the rationalist project of deriving norms of practical reason from the nature of the will.
    Knowledge HowThe Structure of ActionPractical Reason, MiscVirtue Ethics, MiscKnowledge of Action
  •  364
    Intention
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2009.
    Philosophical perplexity about intention begins with its appearance in three guises: intention for the future, as when I intend to complete this entry by the end of the month; the intention with which someone acts, as I am typing with the further intention of writing an introductory sentence; and intentional action, as in the fact that I am typing these words intentionally. As Elizabeth Anscombe wrote in a similar context, ‘it is implausible to say that the word is equivocal as it occurs in thes…Read more
    Philosophical perplexity about intention begins with its appearance in three guises: intention for the future, as when I intend to complete this entry by the end of the month; the intention with which someone acts, as I am typing with the further intention of writing an introductory sentence; and intentional action, as in the fact that I am typing these words intentionally. As Elizabeth Anscombe wrote in a similar context, ‘it is implausible to say that the word is equivocal as it occurs in these different cases’ and from the fact that ‘we are tempted to speak of “different senses” of a word which is clearly not equivocal, we may infer that we are pretty much in the dark about the character of the concept which it represents’ (Anscombe 1963, p. 1)
    Intentions
  •  341
    Against internalism
    Noûs 38 (2). 2004.
    Argues that practical irrationality is akin to moral culpability: it is defective practical thought which one could legitimately have been expected to avoid. It is thus a mistake to draw too tight a connection between failure to be moved by reasons and practical irrationality (as in a certain kind of "internalism"): one's failure may be genuine, but not culpable, and therefore not irrational.
    Internalism and Externalism about ReasonsReasons and RationalityInternalism and Externalism about Mo…Read more
    Internalism and Externalism about ReasonsReasons and RationalityInternalism and Externalism about Moral Judgment
  •  385
    Reasons and Causes
    European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1): 129-157. 2011.
    Argues for a causal-psychological account of acting for reasons. This view is distinguished from a more ambitious causal theory of action, clarified as far as possible, and motivated—against non-reductive, teleological, and behaviourist alternatives—on broadly metaphysical grounds
    Reasons and CausesCausal Theory of ActionPhilosophy of Action, Misc
  •  433
    Knowing How
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (3pt3): 285-307. 2012.
    Argues from the possibility of basic intentional action to a non-propositional theory of knowing how. The argument supports a broadly Anscombean conception of the will as a capacity for practical knowledge.
    Knowledge HowKnowledge of Action
  •  212
    Review of Sarah Stroud and Christine Tappolet, eds., 'Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality' (review)
    Philosophical Review 114 (1): 131-135. 2005.
    Weakness of Will
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback