• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Andrew Chignell

Princeton University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    92
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Recommended
    1
  •  Events
    26
  •  News and Updates
    77

 More details
  • Princeton University
    University Center for Human Values
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
Yale University
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 2004
APA Eastern Division
Homepage
Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America
0000-0002-3303-6195
Areas of Specialization
Immanuel Kant
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Food Ethics
Hope
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Aesthetics
19th Century Philosophy
European Philosophy
Immanuel Kant
PhilPapers Editorships
Hope
Immanuel Kant
Kant: Metaphysics and Epistemology
Kant: Skepticism
Kant: Aesthetic Judgment
Neo-Kantianism
1 more
  • All publications (92)
  •  156
    Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy (review)
    with Peter Gilgen
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. 2013.
    A review of a volume on Neo-Kantianism edited by Rudolf Makkreel and Sebastian Luft. -/-.
    Neo-KantianismErnst Cassirer
  •  2726
    Kant on the normativity of taste: The role of aesthetic ideas
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3). 2007.
    For Kant, the form of a subject's experience of an object provides the normative basis for an aesthetic judgement about it. In other words, if the subject's experience of an object has certain structural properties, then Kant thinks she can legitimately judge that the object is beautiful - and that it is beautiful for everyone. My goal in this paper is to provide a new account of how this 'subjective universalism' is supposed to work. In doing so, I appeal to Kant's notions of an aesthetic idea …Read more
    For Kant, the form of a subject's experience of an object provides the normative basis for an aesthetic judgement about it. In other words, if the subject's experience of an object has certain structural properties, then Kant thinks she can legitimately judge that the object is beautiful - and that it is beautiful for everyone. My goal in this paper is to provide a new account of how this 'subjective universalism' is supposed to work. In doing so, I appeal to Kant's notions of an aesthetic idea and an aesthetic attribute, and the connection that Kant makes between an object's expression of rational and the normativity of aesthetic judgements about it.
    Aesthetic JudgmentAesthetic UniversalityAesthetic Symbol SystemsKant: Aesthetic JudgmentAesthetic No…Read more
    Aesthetic JudgmentAesthetic UniversalityAesthetic Symbol SystemsKant: Aesthetic JudgmentAesthetic Normativity
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback