•  22
    Backmatter
    In Philip Pettit & Christopher Hookway (eds.), Handlung Und Interpretation: Studien Zur Philosophie der Sozialwissenschaften, De Gruyter. pp. 225-226. 1982.
  •  53
    Belief, Confidence and the Method of Science
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (1). 1993.
  •  111
    VII*—Scepticism and Autonomy
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 90 (1): 103-118. 1990.
    Christopher Hookway; VII*—Scepticism and Autonomy, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 90, Issue 1, 1 June 1990, Pages 103–118, https://doi.org/10.1.
  • Michael Cabot Haley, "The Semeiosis of Poetic Metaphor" (review)
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (1): 156. 1990.
  •  57
    Quine
    Polity. 2013.
    This book provides a clear and comprehensive introduction to the work of Willard van Orman Quine, the most important and influential American philosopher of the post-war period. An understanding of Quine's work is essential for anyone who wishes to follow contemporary debates in the philosophy of language, the philosophy of mind and metaphysics. Hookway traces the development of Quine's work from his early criticisms of logical positivism and empiricism to his more recent theories about mind and…Read more
  •  39
    Whether the interpretations made by social scientists of the thoughts, utterances and actions of other people, including those from an alien culture or a ...
  •  49
    5 Truth, Reality, and Convergence
    In Cheryl Misak (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Peirce, Cambridge University Press. pp. 127. 2004.
  •  62
    How to be a Virtue Epistemologist
    In Michael DePaul & Linda Zagzebski (eds.), Intellectual virtue: perspectives from ethics and epistemology, Oxford University Press. pp. 183-202. 2003.
    This chapter points out that standard versions of virtue epistemology accept and are motivated by the same central problems in epistemology — such as analyzing the concepts of knowledge and justification, and addressing skeptical challenges — which motivate contemporary epistemology. The only significant difference is that virtue epistemology claims that the concepts of knowledge and justification must be analyzed in terms of virtues. What motivates virtue ethicists, however, is not what is moti…Read more