• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Christopher Hookway

University of Sheffield
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    190
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    6
  •  News and Updates
    48

 More details
  • University of Sheffield
    Department of Philosophy
    Retired faculty
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
17th/18th Century Philosophy
Philosophy of the Americas
  • All publications (190)
  •  114
    The Presidential Address: Questions of Context
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1). 1996.
    Christopher Hookway; I *—The Presidential Address: Questions of Context, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 96, Issue 1, 1 June 1996, Pages 1–16, h.
  •  19
    Personenverzeichnis
    with Philip Pettit
    In Philip Pettit & Christopher Hookway (eds.), Handlung Und Interpretation: Studien Zur Philosophie der Sozialwissenschaften, De Gruyter. pp. 223-224. 1982.
  •  129
    Pragmatism
    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008.
    William JamesPragmatism about TruthNormativity and NaturalismCharles Sanders PeirceJohn Dewey
  •  11
    Booknotes: Booknotes
    Philosophy 65 (254): 535-536. 1990.
  •  1232
    Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Reflections on Fricker
    Episteme 7 (2): 151-163. 2010.
    Miranda Fricker's important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial injustice and hermeneutic injustice. It explores how agents' capacities to make assertions and provide testimony can be impaired in ways that can involve forms of distinctively epistemic injustice. My paper identifies a wider range of forms of epistemic injustice that do not all involve the ability to make assertions or offer testimony. The paper considers some examples of some other ways in which injus…Read more
    Miranda Fricker's important study of epistemic injustice is focussed primarily on testimonial injustice and hermeneutic injustice. It explores how agents' capacities to make assertions and provide testimony can be impaired in ways that can involve forms of distinctively epistemic injustice. My paper identifies a wider range of forms of epistemic injustice that do not all involve the ability to make assertions or offer testimony. The paper considers some examples of some other ways in which injustice can prevent someone from participating in inquiry
    Testimony, MiscThe Nature of TestimonyEpistemic InjusticeInquiry
  •  72
    Design and Chance: The Evolution of Peirce's Evolutionary Cosmology
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 33 (1). 1997.
    Charles Sanders Peirce
  •  24
    Notebook: Notebook
    Philosophy 59 (229): 425-426. 1984.
    //static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS003181910007011X/resource/name/firstPage-S003181910007011Xa.jpg.
  •  43
    Naturalism and rationality
    Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 70 35-56. 2000.
    Science, Logic, and MathematicsGeneral Philosophy of Science, Miscellaneous
  •  76
    Review of Charles Sanders Peirce, Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, Volume 8: 1890-1892 (review)
    Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8). 2010.
    Charles Sanders Peirce
  •  43
    Book reviews (review)
    Mind 103 (411): 145-148. 1994.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback