Pierre-Marie Morel

La référence à la nature, qu'elle soit normative ou descriptive, croise les thèmes essentiels de l'éthique d'Aristote : la fin ultime, l'acquisition des vertus, le plaisir et les émotions, les liens relationnels, la justice et la vie en cité, la responsabilité. L'éthique aristotélicienne n'est pas pour autant "naturaliste" au sens où le bien humain dériverait de tendances et de prédispositions naturelles. Cet ouvrage, en procédant à une étude systématique de la référence à la nature dans l'éthique aristotélicienne, défend une nouvelle interprétation du naturalisme pratique d'Aristote : un naturalisme critique, le plus souvent dialectique, qui s'interroge sur les conditions de base du bien humain ; non pas un naturalisme scientifique, en vertu duquel la biologie serait source de prescriptions morales, mais un naturalisme problématique qui délimite des possibilités d'agir. L'une des tâches primordiales du théoricien de l'éthique, comme celle du politique actif, est précisément d'évaluer dans quelle mesure le bien humain dépend de la nature ou s'en affranchit."--Page 4 of cover.

The aim of this article is to show that love and politics are closely connected in Lucretius’ poem De rerum natura. On the one hand, passionate love (Book IV) is similar to the vain desire for political power; on the other hand, sexual desire of primitive human beings (in Book V) is implicitely opposed to the ‘common good’ which governs human societies and cities. Moreover, the description, in Book IV, of non passionate sexuality, or free love, which is characterized by mutual desire and shared pleasure, is a sort of counter-model, or an alternative paradigm, in opposition to political and social alienation and violence. In other words, it is argued, Lucretius’ global attitude to love, sex and politics is an important feature of the therapy of the soul. Accordingly, it reveals a deep suspicion in face of social life and political activities.

From an analysis of the famous principle ‘‘Nature does nothing in vain’’ in Aristotle’s Locomotion of animals, this paper addresses the question of the meaning and boundaries of finalism in zoology, as well as the related idea of conformity with nature. It is argued that, although ‘‘Nature does nothing in vain’’ seems to allude, at first glance, to cosmic or global teleology, the treatise On the Locomotion of Animals gives a different meaning to the formula : the teleological account, in this context, depends on a local and relative finalism, which is defined in accordance with the specific and generic properties of animals, and not by reference to any alleged cosmic axiology or global causal chain. However, this principle should not be reduced to organic teleology strictly speaking, in so far as it involves also external and necessary conditions, which are common rules governing the locomotion of animals.

In the Posterior Analytics, deiknunai is often synonymous with apodeiknunai. This is the case when it means ‘demonstrate’ in the strict sense of a syllogistic deduction. However, in other occurrences, it seems to designate something different, like a ‘proof’ in general or a particular kind of proof. Does this mean that deiknunai is an imprecise term, belonging to a weak level of technical terminology and falling outside the semantic core of Aristotle’s theory of science? Conversely, it could be that certain uses of deiknunai, despite their relative lack of technicality, reveals something deeper and more significant, regarding Aristotle’s conceptions of proof and demonstration. The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the latter hypothesis.It is argued that Aristotle uses deiknunai (and other terms of the same family) so as to preserve apodeiknunai for the technical sense of ‘demonstrate’ (and preserve apodeixis for ‘demonstration’) in the strict meaning of the term, in particular within the expression apodeiknunai haplôs.

"The aim of this paper is to inscribe the argument on the Practical Syllogism of De motu animalium, chapter 7, in its immediate context. Now this framework is by no means a logical one. The De motu is a psychological or zoological treatise, whose scope belongs to natural philosophy. Moreover De motu's Practical Syllogism cannot be restricted to practical, i.e. anthropological, cases, like akrasia. It is inserted in a physiological development regarding the biological explanation of animal emotions, reactions and actions. Thus, the necessity of the conclusion – here the action itself – does not mean that the conditions for acting are reducible to propositions or to logical connections: rather it stands for the necessity that governs the agent-patient relation in animal movement."

First collection of essays entirely devoted to the inscription of Diogenes of Oinoanda. The texts of Diogenes of Oinoanda (2nd century AD) who invited his readers to an Epicurean life is the largest ancient inscription ever discovered. Over 70 new finds have increased the number of known wall blocks and fragments to nearly 300, offering new insights into Diogenes' distinctive presentation of philosophy. This collection of essays discusses the philosophical significance of these discoveries and is the first of this kind entirely devoted to Diogenes of Oinoanda. Particular attention is paid to his philosophical aims and polemical strategies. Diogenes was apparently well aware of still ongoing philosophical debates, engaging in polemics against Presocratic philosophers, Platonics, and especially Stoics. His views about important issues like happiness, fear, old age, and the afterlife are explained on the bases of Epicurean physics and theology, ethics, politics, theory of knowledge, and psychology.

On décèle une tension entre deux tendances dans la philosophie aristotélicienne de la praxis : d’une part; une insistance claire sur la spécificité de l’action humaine par rapport à la conduite animale ; d’autre part; la volonté de définir un genre commun pour les différents types d’activités; humaines et animales. Si cette tension peut être surmontée; c’est sans doute en distinguant les différents registres (axiologique; psychologique; éthologique) du discours aristotélicien. C’est aussi en précisant le type de ressemblance qui; à la fois; rapproche et distingue l’homme de l’animal : si la conduite humaine et la conduite animale appartiennent à un genre commun; elles demeurent distinguées par un rapport d’analogie; c’est-à-dire par une différence irréductible. L’analyse éthologique d’Aristote; loin de conduire à une naturalisation du comportement humain; conduit à sa spécification

In the last lines of Politics VII, 3, Aristotle states that the happy city acts nobly. This implies that the city has a practical life, and that this life has its end in itself. This claim seems to contradict the famous distinction, which has been made elsewhere by Aristotle, between the practical and theoretical lives. It is argued in this paper that there is, here, neither contradiction nor inconsistency in Aristotle’s conception of human action. Some readings, according to which this passage deals with the role of the philosophers in the happy city, are also ruled out. The proposed solution consists in showing that this text refers to a broader conception of action, one that is beyond the sphere of human practical activities: any genuine praxis has its goal in itself, even when it produces external effects.

Para Aristóteles, a memória não consiste somente em conservar os traços do passado e tomá-los novamente por objetos. O tratado Da memória e da reminiscência examina mais geralmente o papel das imagens no exercício do pensamento. Ele descreve o processo de reminiscência ou rememoração, e trata assim da organização voluntária das representações mentais como de seus encaminhamentos involuntários e patológicos. Correlativamente, ele explica em que sentido o homem pode ser agente de suas próprias representações e o princípio de suas associações. Aristóteles aborda, por conseguinte, a propósito da memória, questões fundamentais para a definição dos estados psíquicos, para a teoria do conhecimento, bem como para a concepção do eu ou da identidade pessoal. A análise da memória e da reminiscência conduz assim a uma reavaliação da concepção aristotélica do caráter, fazendo deste último o substrato e o agente de uma história pessoal que não pode ser abstraída de suas condições psicofísicas.

This paper deals with the aetiological aspect of the Epicurean conception of passions. It is argued that the therapy of the soul relies on an overall explanation of the various emotional states, and that fear is at the core of this framework in so far as it is the root of most psychic troubles. The first part deals with fear in the context of the general theory of passions. The second part shows that this basic emotion is the root of injustice and political excessive ambition, in Lucretius’De rerum natura. The third part puts the emphasis on the role of anxiety in passionate love, in the same text. Fear, in its various forms, appears to be the main cause of a number of pathological emotions. It may be concluded that the Epicurean therapy of emotions, far from dealing with separate passions from case to case, is based on a holistic approach of psychic states.

The aim of this paper is to inscribe the argument on the Practical Syllogism of De motu animalium, chapter 7, in its immediate context. Now this framework is by no means a logical one. The De motu is a psychological or zoological treatise, whose scope belongs to natural philosophy. Moreover De motu’s Practical Syllogism cannot be restricted to practical, i.e. anthropological, cases, like akrasia. It is inserted in a physiological development regarding the biological explanation of animal emotions, reactions and actions. Thus, the necessity of the conclusion – here the action itself – does not mean that the conditions for acting are reducible to propositions or to logical connections: rather it stands for the necessity that governs the agent-patient relation in animal movement.

The aim of this paper is to inscribe the argument on the Practical Syllogism of De motu animalium, chapter 7, in its immediate context. Now this framework is by no means a logical one. The De motu is a psychological or zoological treatise, whose scope belongs to natural philosophy. Moreover De motu’s Practical Syllogism cannot be restricted to practical, i.e. anthropological, cases, like akrasia. It is inserted in a physiological development regarding the biological explanation of animal emotions, reactions and actions. Thus, the necessity of the conclusion – here the action itself – does not mean that the conditions for acting are reducible to propositions or to logical connections: rather it stands for the necessity that governs the agent-patient relation in animal movement

Le discours de Plotin sur la phusis ne relève pas à proprement parler de la « science » de la nature. Il s’efforce cependant de caractériser la nature elle-même et son mode de production spécifique dans le Traité 30 -De la nature, de la contemplation et de l’Un. Ce traité recourt, concernant la nature, à une argumentation d’un type spécifique – en l’occurrence, une argumentation négative. On analyse ici la manière dont Plotin définit la production naturelle par un double contraste : en l’opposant à la production technique et à l’action. Il montre ainsi qu’il y a un discours spécifique sur la nature, mais aussi que la méthode la plus appropriée consiste à dire ce qu’elle n’est pas.Comment parler de la nature? Plotinus’ analysis of phusis doesn’t belong, properly speaking, to « science » of Nature. Nevertheless Plotinus tries to characterize Nature itself in a specific way, that is through a negative argumentation. According to Treatise 30 - On Nature and Contemplation and the One, Nature must be defined in contrast with two kinds of activities : technical production and action. It appears, consequently, that there is a specific discourse about Nature, but also that the most appropriate method consists in telling what Nature is not.