-
8Por qué Hume y Kant se equivocaron al rechazar la teología naturalEstudios Filosóficos 61 (177): 209-225. 2012.
-
8¿Hay Un Dios?Ediciones Sígueme. 2012.Argues that there is a God. Spanish short version of The Existence of God.
-
7Evil does not show that there is no GodIn Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology, Oxford University Press. pp. 599--613. 2000.
-
7Arguments for the existence of GodIn J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God?, Handsel Press. 1984.In an inductive argument data increase the probability of a hypothesis insofar as the hypothesis makes probable the data, the data are otherwise not likely to occur, and the hypothesis is simple. The cosmological argument from the existence of the universe, the teleological argument from its conformity to natural law, and other arguments from more detailed features of the universe each increase the probability that there is a God. I thus summarize in a simple form the main points of my book The …Read more
-
7Selections from Personal identity : the dualist theoryIn John P. Lizza (ed.), Defining the beginning and end of life: readings on personal identity and bioethics, Johns Hopkins University Press. 2009.
-
6Review of Elliott Sober: Simplicity (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4): 412-414. 1976.
-
6Comments on Some Aspects of Peter Unger's Identity, Consciousness and ValuePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1): 145-148. 1992.
-
6Law and Explanation: An Essay in the Philosophy of SciencePhilosophical Quarterly 22 (89): 375-377. 1972.
-
6Review of R. D. Rosenkrantz: Inference, Method and Decision (review)British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3): 301-304. 1978.
-
6Why God allows evilIn Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology, Oxford University Press Usa. 2000.
-
5Introduction to Bayes's TheoremIn Bayes’s Theorem, Oxford University Press. 2002.This is an introduction to a collected volume. It distinguishes between evidential, statistical, and physical probability, and between objective and subjective understandings of evidential probability, in the use of Bayes’s theorem. If Bayes’s theorem is to be used to assess an objective evidential probability, a priori criteria--mainly the criterion of simplicity--are required to determine prior probability. The five main contributors to the volume discuss the use of Bayes’s theorem to assess t…Read more
-
5The justification of inductionRevue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 165 (2): 183-184. 1974.