-
43In Defence of GuerrillasDiametros 23 84-103. 2010.This article examines the moral issues of guerrilla, and counter-guerrilla, warfare. Just war theorists who have studied the phenomenon tend to claim that the guerrilla tactic of wearing civilian clothes and hiding among the civilian population is rather difficult, if at all, to reconcile with the ius in bello principle of discrimination (the principle according to which combatants have to distinguish between combatants and non-combatants and may only target the former “directly”). I argue that …Read more
-
42The Philosophy of Jürgen Habermas: A Critical IntroductionOxford University Press. 2009.Jürgen Habermas seeks to defend the Enlightenment and with it an "emphatical", "uncurtailed" conception of reason against the post-modern critique of reason on the one hand, and against so-called scientism (which would include critical rationalism and the greater part of analytical philosophy) on the other. His objection to the former is that it is self-contradictory and politically defeatist; his objection to the latter is that, thanks to a standard of rationality derived from the natural scien…Read more
-
40Stephen Kershnar, Gratitude Toward Veterans: Why Americans Should Not Be Very Grateful to Veterans: Plymouth, England: Lexington Books, 2014, 158 pp, ISBN 978-0-7391-8578-0 £49.95Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (2): 479-481. 2016.Stephen Kershnar’s main argument in Gratitude toward Veterans is that Americans should not be very grateful towards veterans. More precisely, he not only argues that veterans do not deserve the gratitude that many Americans offer them, but also that it is morally objectionable to be grateful towards them. His argument is applicable to war veterans generally, not only to those in the USA. Yet, it does have specific relevance to the United States given that, as Kershnar demonstrates, public gratit…Read more
-
38Legalizing Defensive TorturePublic Affairs Quarterly 26 (1): 19-32. 2012.Since people have a right even to kill a culpable aggressor if, in the circumstances, this is a proportionate and necessary means of self–defense against an imminent or ongoing attack, and since most forms of torture are not as bad as killing, people must also have a right to torture a culpable aggressor if this, too, in the circumstances, is a proportionate and necessary means of self–defense against an imminent or ongoing attack.But can torture really ever be a form of self–defense? Yes, it ca…Read more
-
37On the Concept, Function, Scope, and Evaluation of Justification(s)Argumentation 14 (2): 79-105. 2000.
-
29Really Just Words: Against McGowan’s Arguments for Further Speech RegulationPhilosophia 50 (3): 1455-1477. 2022.McGowan argues “that ordinary utterances routinely enact norms without the speaker having or exercising any special authority” and thereby not “merely cause” but “constitute” harm if harm results from adherence to the enacted norms. The discovery of this “previously overlooked mechanism,” she claims, provides a potential justification for “further speech regulation.” Her argument is unsuccessful. She merely redefines concepts like “harm constitution” and “norm enactment” and fails to explain why…Read more
-
27Online Exclusive: Torture Can Be Self-defense: A Critique Of Whitley KaufmanEthics and International Affairs 22 (1). 2008.In this online response, Uwe Steinhoff argues that Whitley Kaufman's denial that torturing the "ticking bomb terrorist" can be justifiable is incorrect.
-
26Lazar on “Moral Sunk Costs” and the “Discount View”Ratio Juris 35 (1): 21-29. 2022.Ratio Juris, Volume 35, Issue 1, Page 21-29, March 2022.
-
25Right Intention: A Reply to Janzen, Purves, and JenkinsJournal of Military Ethics 17 (2-3): 172-176. 2018.
-
23Précis of the Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War TheoryPhilosophia 51 (5): 2301-2306. 2023.
-
18Against Pogge's ‘Cosmopolitanism’Ratio 26 (3): 329-341. 2013.Thomas Pogge labels the idea that each person owes each other person equal respect and concern ‘ethical cosmopolitanism’ and correctly states that it is a ‘non‐starter’. He offers as an allegedly more convincing cosmopolitan alternative his ‘social justice cosmopolitanism’. I shall argue that this alternative fails for pretty much the same reasons that ‘ethical cosmopolitanism’ fails. In addition, I will show that Pogge's definition of cosmopolitanism is misleading, since it actually applies to …Read more
-
18The Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War TheoryRoutledge. 2020.This book provides a thorough critical overview of the current debate on the ethics of war, as well as a modern just war theory that can give practical action-guidance by recognizing and explaining the moral force of widely accepted law. Traditionalist, Walzerian, and "revisionist" approaches have dominated contemporary debates about the classical jus ad bellum and jus in bello requirements in just war theory. In this book, Uwe Steinhoff corrects widely spread misinterpretations of these competi…Read more
-
17The Secret to the Success of the Doctrine of Double Effect (and Related Principles): Biased Framing, Inadequate Methodology, and Clever DistractionsThe Journal of Ethics 22 (3-4): 235-263. 2018.There are different formulations of the doctrine of double effect (DDE), and sometimes philosophers propose “revisions” or alternatives, like the means principle, for instance. To demonstrate that such principles are needed in the first place, one would have to compare cases in which all else is equal and show that the difference in intuitions, if any, can only be explained by the one remaining difference and thus by the principle in question. This is not the methodology defenders of the DDE and…Read more
-
16Killing CiviliansIn Hew Strachan & Sibylle Scheipers (eds.), The Changing Character of War, Oxford University Press. pp. 381--393. 2011.
-
16Zur Ethik des Krieges und des TerrorismusVerlag W. Kohlhammer. 2011.Wann ist ein Krieg gerecht? Wer ist "unschuldig", und wer ist unter welchen Umstanden ein legitimes Angriffsziel? Und was bedeutet das fur die Beurteilung von Terrorismus? Diese und andere hochaktuelle Fragen behandelt Uwe Steinhoff in seiner kritischen und provokativen Analyse auch im Ruckgriff auf aktuelle Beispiele wie den Nahostkonflikt und den "Krieg gegen den Terror". Der Leser erhalt einen profunden und prazisen Uberblick uber die philosophische Debatte als unentbehrliches Rustzeug fur di…Read more
-
12Reply to CriticsPhilosophia 51 (5): 2357-2377. 2023.This article provides a response to the contributors of this symposium. Notably, I respond to the following objections: that my list of just war criteria is too long on an “ideal” level and too short for practical purposes; that in particular my rejection of legitimate authority is misguided; that I am wrong in claiming that in just war theory the conditions of proportionality and necessity, which are separate in the self-defense justification, must be merged; that my “social practice view” – wh…Read more
-
10The Ethics of TerrorismIn Georg Meggle, Andreas Kemmerling & Mark Textor (eds.), Ethics of Terrorism & Counter-Terrorism, De Gruyter. pp. 215-224. 2004.
-
7Moral Ambiguities in the Bombing of Monte CassinoJournal of Military Ethics 4 (2): 142-143. 2005.
-
2How Can Terrorism Be Justified?In Igor Primoratz (ed.), Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues, Palgrave-macmillan. pp. 97--109. 2004.
-
Die Relativität der Gültigkeit von BegründengenConceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 28 (71): 239-250. 1994.
-
A Referate uber deutschsprachige Neuerscheinungen-Moralisch korrektes TotenPhilosophischer Literaturanzeiger 59 (3): 274. 2006.
-
Die Begründung der Konsenstheorie. Über das fehlende Fundament der DiskursethikLogos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España]. forthcoming.
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics |
Normative Ethics |
Social and Political Philosophy |