• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Tim Maudlin

New York UniversityUniversità della Svizzera Italiana
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    94
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    23
  •  News and Updates
    79
  •  Philosophical Views

 More details
  • New York University
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
  • Università della Svizzera Italiana
    Institute of Philosophy (ISFI)
    Visiting Professor (Part-time)
Greenwich Village, New York, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Metaphysics
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
Philosophy of Cosmology
Bohmian Interpretation
Collapse Interpretations
Everett Interpretation
Measurement Problem
Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics
3 more
Areas of Interest
The Big Bang
Inflation in Cosmology
Origin of the Universe
Bohmian Interpretation
Collapse Interpretations
Everett Interpretation
Measurement Problem
Probabilities in Quantum Mechanics
3 more
  • All publications (94)
  •  400
    Critical Study David Wallace, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 2012, 530 + xv pp (review)
    Noûs 48 (4): 794-808. 2014.
    Everett Interpretation
  •  324
    Thoroughly muddled Mctaggart: Or, how to abuse gauge freedom to create metaphysical monostrosities
    Philosophers' Imprint 2 1-23. 2002.
    It has long been a commonplace that there is a problem understanding the role of time when one tries to quantize the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). In his "Thoroughly Modern McTaggart" (Philosophers' Imprint Vol 2, No. 3), John Earman presents several arguments to the conclusion that there is a problem understanding change and the passage of time in the unadorned GTR, quite apart from quantization. His Young McTaggart argues that according to the GTR, no physical magnitude ever changes. A c…Read more
    It has long been a commonplace that there is a problem understanding the role of time when one tries to quantize the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). In his "Thoroughly Modern McTaggart" (Philosophers' Imprint Vol 2, No. 3), John Earman presents several arguments to the conclusion that there is a problem understanding change and the passage of time in the unadorned GTR, quite apart from quantization. His Young McTaggart argues that according to the GTR, no physical magnitude ever changes. A close consideration of Young McTaggart's arguments show that they turn on either a bad choice of formalism or an unwarranted interpretation of the implications of the formalism. This suggests that the problems that arise in quantization may be founded in similar shortcomings.
    McTaggart's ArgumentThe Hole Argument
  •  1
    The Philosophical Implications of Quantum Mechanics: Dvd
    with Ken Knisely and Drew Arrowood
    Milk Bottle Productions
    What’s the deal with the really, really, weird-acting stuff that everything is made of? Can we ever take in our everyday world the same way again if we fully understand the nature of the quantum world? With Jeffrey Bub, Tim Maudlin, and Drew Arrowood.
    Quantum Mechanics
  •  521
    Substances and space-time: What Aristotle would have said to Einstein
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4): 531-561. 1990.
    The Hole ArgumentSubstantivalism about SpacetimeAristotle: Time
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback