-
111Large cardinals and locally defined well-orders of the universeAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 157 (1): 1-15. 2009.By forcing over a model of with a class-sized partial order preserving this theory we produce a model in which there is a locally defined well-order of the universe; that is, one whose restriction to all levels H is a well-order of H definable over the structure H, by a parameter-free formula. Further, this forcing construction preserves all supercompact cardinals as well as all instances of regular local supercompactness. It is also possible to define variants of this construction which, in add…Read more
-
113The stable coreBulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (2): 261-267. 2012.Vopenka [2] proved long ago that every set of ordinals is set-generic over HOD, Gödel's inner model of hereditarily ordinal-definable sets. Here we show that the entire universe V is class-generic over, and indeed over the even smaller inner model $\mathbb{S}=$, where S is the Stability predicate. We refer to the inner model $\mathbb{S}$ as the Stable Core of V. The predicate S has a simple definition which is more absolute than any definition of HOD; in particular, it is possible to add reals w…Read more
-
167Projective mad familiesAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (12): 1581-1587. 2010.Using almost disjoint coding we prove the consistency of the existence of a definable ω-mad family of infinite subsets of ω together with
-
92Internal consistency for embedding complexityJournal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3): 831-844. 2008.In a previous paper with M. Džamonja, class forcings were given which fixed the complexity (a universality covering number) for certain types of structures of size λ together with the value of 2λ for every regular λ. As part of a programme for examining when such global results can be true in an inner model, we build generics for these class forcings
-
88Eastonʼs theorem and large cardinals from the optimal hypothesisAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (12): 1738-1747. 2012.The equiconsistency of a measurable cardinal with Mitchell order o=κ++ with a measurable cardinal such that 2κ=κ++ follows from the results by W. Mitchell [13] and M. Gitik [7]. These results were later generalized to measurable cardinals with 2κ larger than κ++ .In Friedman and Honzik [5], we formulated and proved Eastonʼs theorem [4] in a large cardinal setting, using slightly stronger hypotheses than the lower bounds identified by Mitchell and Gitik , for a suitable μ, instead of the cardinal…Read more
-
94Rank-into-rank hypotheses and the failure of GCHArchive for Mathematical Logic 53 (3-4): 351-366. 2014.In this paper we are concerned about the ways GCH can fail in relation to rank-into-rank hypotheses, i.e., very large cardinals usually denoted by I3, I2, I1 and I0. The main results are a satisfactory analysis of the way the power function can vary on regular cardinals in the presence of rank-into-rank hypotheses and the consistency under I0 of the existence of j:Vλ+1≺Vλ+1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepacka…Read more
-
85Internal Consistency and Global Co-stationarity of the Ground ModelJournal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2). 2008.Global co-stationarity of the ground model from an N₂-c.c, forcing which adds a new subset of N₁ is internally consistent relative to an ω₁-Erdös hyperstrong cardinal and a sufficiently large measurable above
-
209The hyperuniverse programBulletin of Symbolic Logic 19 (1): 77-96. 2013.The Hyperuniverse Program is a new approach to set-theoretic truth which is based on justifiable principles and leads to the resolution of many questions independent from ZFC. The purpose of this paper is to present this program, to illustrate its mathematical content and implications, and to discuss its philosophical assumptions.
-
73The internal consistency of Easton’s theoremAnnals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (2): 259-269. 2008.An Easton function is a monotone function C from infinite regular cardinals to cardinals such that C has cofinality greater than α for each infinite regular cardinal α. Easton showed that assuming GCH, if C is a definable Easton function then in some cofinality-preserving extension, C=2α for all infinite regular cardinals α. Using “generic modification”, we show that over the ground model L, models witnessing Easton’s theorem can be obtained as inner models of L[0#], for Easton functions which a…Read more
-
60On Absoluteness of Categoricity in Abstract Elementary ClassesNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (4): 395-402. 2011.Shelah has shown that $\aleph_1$-categoricity for Abstract Elementary Classes (AECs) is not absolute in the following sense: There is an example $K$ of an AEC (which is actually axiomatizable in the logic $L(Q)$) such that if $2^{\aleph_0}
-
Generalizations of Gödel's universe of constructible setsIn Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Kurt Gödel: essays for his centennial, Association For Symbolic Logic. 2010.
-
176Analytic equivalence relations and bi-embeddabilityJournal of Symbolic Logic 76 (1). 2011.Louveau and Rosendal [5] have shown that the relation of bi-embeddability for countable graphs as well as for many other natural classes of countable structures is complete under Borel reducibility for analytic equivalence relations. This is in strong contrast to the case of the isomorphism relation, which as an equivalence relation on graphs (or on any class of countable structures consisting of the models of a sentence of L ω ₁ ω ) is far from complete (see [5, 2]). In this article we strength…Read more
-
74The tree property at א ω+2Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2). 2011.Assuming the existence of a weakly compact hypermeasurable cardinal we prove that in some forcing extension א ω is a strong limit cardinal and א ω+2 has the tree property. This improves a result of Matthew Foreman (see [2])
-
141Perfect trees and elementary embeddingsJournal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3): 906-918. 2008.An important technique in large cardinal set theory is that of extending an elementary embedding j: M → N between inner models to an elementary embedding j*: M[G] → N[G*] between generic extensions of them. This technique is crucial both in the study of large cardinal preservation and of internal consistency. In easy cases, such as when forcing to make the GCH hold while preserving a measurable cardinal (via a reverse Easton iteration of α-Cohen forcing for successor cardinals α), the generic G*…Read more