-
33Systems of measurementRatio 18 (2). 2005.Wittgenstein and Kripke disagree about the status of the proposition: the Standard Metre is one metre long. Wittgenstein believes it is necessary. Kripke argues that it is contingent. Kripke's argument depends crucially on a certain sort of thought‐experiment with which we are invited to test our intuitions about what is and isn’t necessary. In this paper I argue that, while Kripke's conclusion is strictly correct, nevertheless similar Kripke‐style thought experiments indicate that the metric sy…Read more
-
105Loar's defence of physicalismRatio 17 (1): 60-67. 2004.Brian Loar believes he has refuted all those antiphysicalist arguments that take as their point of departure observations about what is or isn't conceivable. I argue that there remains an important, popular and plausible-looking form of conceivability argument that Loar has entirely overlooked. Though he may not have realized it, Saul Kripke presents, or comes close to presenting, two fundamentally different forms of conceivability argument. I distinguish the two arguments and point out that whi…Read more
-
609The evil-god challengeReligious Studies 46 (3). 2010.This paper develops a challenge to theism. The challenge is to explain why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-good god should be considered significantly more reasonable than the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient and all-evil god. Theists typically dismiss the evil-god hypothesis out of hand because of the problem of good–there is surely too much good in the world for it to be the creation of such a being. But then why doesn't the problem of e…Read more
-
29other thinkers on any topic broadly related either to philosophy or to the development of thinking skills. It is anticipated that most contributors..
-
54Plantinga's belief-cum-desire argument refutedReligious Studies 47 (2): 245-256. 2011.In Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga develops an argument designed to show that naturalism is self-defeating. One component of this larger argument is what I call Plantinga's belief-cum-desire argument, which is intended to establish something more specific: that if the content of our beliefs does causally effect behaviour (that is to say, semantic content is not epiphenomenal), and if naturalism and current evolutionary doctrine are correct, then the probability that we possess relia…Read more
-
58Thinking tools: Weak analogy: Law Thinking ToolsThink 5 (15): 59-60. 2007.Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously
-
95Could a Machine Think?: Law Could a machine think?Think 1 (1): 55-65. 2002.The year is 2100. Geena is the proud new owner of Emit, a state-of-the-art robot. She has just unwrapped him, the packaging strewn across the dining room floor. Emit is designed to replicate the outward behaviour of a human being down to the last detail . Emit responds to questions in much the same way humans do. Ask him how he feels and he will say he has had a tough day, has a slight headache, is sorry he broke that vase, and so on. Geena flips the switch at the back of Emit's neck to ‘on’. Em…Read more
-
33Thinking tools: The gambler's fallacy: Law Thinking toolsThink 2 (5): 51-52. 2003.Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously. Here we get to grips with an everyday reasoning error: the gambler's fallacy.
-
75Thinking tools. Fallacy: Two wrongs make a right: Law thinking toolsThink 7 (19): 71-71. 2008.Thinking tools is a regular feature that offers tips and pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously.
-
545Evidence, Miracles, and the Existence of JesusFaith and Philosophy 28 (2): 129-151. 2011.The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testamentdocuments alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence bey…Read more
-
86The God of Eth: Law The God of EthThink 3 (9): 13-26. 2005.A dialogue investigating whether the usual religious defences of belief in God are really up to the job
-
39Just knowingThe Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56): 51-57. 2012.I remain entirely unconvinced that anyone who claims to “just know” that the dead walk among us, or that God exists, knows any such thing. Not only do I think the rest of us have good grounds for doubting their experience, I don’t believe it’s reasonable for them to take their own experience at face value either.