-
233Killing and letting die (edited book)Fordham University Press. 1994.This collection contains twenty-one thought-provoking essays on the controversies surrounding the moral and legal distinctions between euthanasia and "letting die." Since public awareness of this issue has increased this second edition includes nine entirely new essays which bring the treatment of the subject up-to-date. The urgency of this issue can be gauged in recent developments such as the legalization of physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands, "how-to" manuals topping the bestseller…Read more
-
110Consequentialism and the Unforeseeable FutureAnalysis 50 (4). 1990.If consequentialism is understood as claiming, at least, that the moral character of an action depends only on the consequences of the action, it might be thought that the difficulty of knowing what all the consequences of any action will be poses a problem for consequentialism. J. J. C. Smart writes that in most cases..
-
309Two dogmas of deontology: Aggregation, rights, and the separateness of persons: Alastair NorcrossSocial Philosophy and Policy 26 (1): 76-95. 2009.One of the currently popular dogmata of anti-consequentialism is that consequentialism doesn't respect, recognize, or in some important way account for what is referred to as the The charge is often made, but rarely explained in any detail, much less argued for. In this paper I explain what I take to be the most plausible interpretation of the separateness of persons charge. I argue that the charge itself can be deconstructed into at least two further objections to consequentialist theories. The…Read more
-
36A Consequentialist Case for Rejecting the RightJournal of Philosophical Research 18 109-125. 1993.Satisficing and maximizing versions of consequentialism have both assumed that rightness is an alI-or-nothing property. We argue thal this is inimical to the spirit of consequentialism, and that, from the point of view of the consequentialist, actions should be evaluated purely in terms that admit of degree. We first consider the suggestion that rightness and wrongness are a matter of degree. If so, this raises the question of whether the claim that something is wrong says any more than that it …Read more
-
Pt. VII. Research ethics. Clinical equipoise: foundational requirement or fundamental error / Alex John London ; Research on cognitively impaired adults / Jason Karlawish ; Research in developing countries / Florencia Luna ; Animal experimentation (review)In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics, Oxford University Press. 2007.
-
159Intransitivity and the person-affecting principlePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3): 769-776. 1999.Philosophy journals and conferences have recently seen several attempts to argue that 'all-things-considered better than' does not obey strict transitivity. This paper focuses on Larry Temkin's argument in "Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox." Although his argument is not aimed just at utilitarians or even consequentialists in general, it is of prticular significance to consequentialists. If 'all-things-considered better than' does not obey transitivity, there may be choice situations …Read more
-
46Why Legitimacy Doesn’t Entail Obligation: A Response to WyckoffSouthwest Philosophy Review 26 (2): 13-16. 2010.
-
80Beastly Violence, or How Kant Screws Everything up Yet AgainSouthwest Philosophy Review 27 (2): 63-66. 2011.
-
85Reasons without demands: Rethinking rightnessIn James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory, Blackwell. pp. 38--54. 2006.
-
936Puppies, pigs, and people: Eating meat and marginal casesPhilosophical Perspectives 18 (1). 2004.
-
47Great harms from small benefits grow: how death can be outweighed by headachesAnalysis 58 (2): 152-158. 1998.
-
87Contractualism and the Ethical Status of AnimalsSouthwest Philosophy Review 17 (1): 137-143. 2000.
-
70Animal experimentationIn Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics, Oxford University Press. 2007.This article takes the central issue concerning the ethics of animal experimentation to be the moral status of animals. Since most animal experimentation involves treating experimental subjects in ways that would clearly not be morally acceptable if the subjects were human, and since no animal experimentation involves the informed consent of the experimental subject, any attempt to justify such experimentation must include a defense of the claim that the moral status of animals differs significa…Read more
-
37Rationality and the sure-thing principleAustralasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2). 1996.This Article does not have an abstract
-
449Killing, abortion, and contraception: A reply to MarquisJournal of Philosophy 87 (5): 268-277. 1990.
-
51Death for animalsIn Jens Johansson Fred Feldman Ben Bradley (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death, . pp. 465. 2013.
-
82Speed Limits, Human Lives, and Convenience: A Reply to RidgePhilosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1): 59-64. 1998.
-
90Puppies, Pigs, and Potency: A Response to Galvin and HarrisEthics, Policy and Environment 15 (3). 2012.
Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Applied Ethics |
Meta-Ethics |
Normative Ethics |