• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Mark Sainsbury

University of Texas at Austin
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    116
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    9
  •  News and Updates
    80

 More details
  • University of Texas at Austin
    Department of Philosophy
    Unknown
  • University of Texas at Austin
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of Oxford
Faculty of Philosophy
DPhil, 1970
Homepage
Austin, Texas, United States of America
Areas of Interest
Epistemology
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Action
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
M&E, Misc
1 more
  • All publications (116)
  •  65
    Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume 1: The Dawn of Analysis (review)
    Philosophical Studies 129 (3): 645-665. 2005.
    I discuss Soames's proposal that Moore could have avoided a central problem in his moral philosophy if he had utilized a method he himself pioneered in epistemology. The problem in Moore's moral philossophy concerns what it is for a moral claim to be self-evident. The method in Moore's epistemology concerns not denying the obvious. In view of the distance between something's being self-evident and its being obvious, it is suggested that Soames's proposal is mistaken
    G. E. Moore
  •  72
    Fiction and Fictionalism (review)
    Disputatio 4 (29): 88-94. 2010.
    029-6
    Ontological Fictionalism
  •  55
    Descartes
    Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149): 453-458. 1987.
    René Descartes
  •  339
    Russell on Acquaintance
    Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series 20 219-244. 1986.
    In Russell's Problems of Philosophy (PP), acquaintance is the basis of thought and also the basis of empirical knowledge. Thought is based on acquaintance, in that a thinker has to be acquainted with the basic constituents of his thoughts. Empirical knowledge is based on acquaintance, in that acquaintance is involved in perception, and perception is the ultimate source of all empirical knowledge.
    Sense-Datum TheoriesPerceptual JustificationThe GivenRussell: Epistemology, MiscRussell: Acquaintanc…Read more
    Sense-Datum TheoriesPerceptual JustificationThe GivenRussell: Epistemology, MiscRussell: AcquaintanceRussell: The Problems of Philosophy
  •  117
    Thinking About Things
    Oxford University Press. 2018.
    Mark Sainsbury presents an original account of how language works when describing mental states, based on a new theory of what is involved in attributing attitudes like thinking, hoping, and wanting. He offers solutions to longstanding puzzles about how we can direct our thought to such a diversity of things, including things that do not exist.
    Intensional Transitive Verbs
  • Indexicals and Reported Speech
    In Robert L. Arrington, M. Burkholder Peter, James Shannon Dubose, James W. Dye, Bertrand K. Feibleman, Max Hocutt P. Helm, N. Lee Harold, N. Roberts Louise, C. Sallis John & H. Weiss Donald (eds.), Philosophical Logic, Tulane University. pp. 45-69. 1967.
    SemanticsSpeech Reports
  •  8
    Sorites
    with T. Williamson
    In B. Hale & Crispin Wright (eds.), Blackwell Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Blackwell. 1995.
    Sorites ParadoxMany-Valued LogicSupervaluationismEpistemic Theories of VaguenessDegree Theories of V…Read more
    Sorites ParadoxMany-Valued LogicSupervaluationismEpistemic Theories of VaguenessDegree Theories of Vagueness
  •  86
    Proper names
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 86-124. 2005.
    The sources of the attractiveness of descriptivism and of direct reference theories are identified and shown to be wanting. The intermediate position, RWR, is one in which a proper name may or may not have a bearer, though if it has one it will have it essentially, and if it lacks one this will also be essential. A full development of the view makes use of the notion of the practice of using a name, and a preliminary attempt is made to identify the main components of the concept of a name-using …Read more
    The sources of the attractiveness of descriptivism and of direct reference theories are identified and shown to be wanting. The intermediate position, RWR, is one in which a proper name may or may not have a bearer, though if it has one it will have it essentially, and if it lacks one this will also be essential. A full development of the view makes use of the notion of the practice of using a name, and a preliminary attempt is made to identify the main components of the concept of a name-using practice and to say something constructive about their character.
  •  2
    Paradoxes
    Philosophy 65 (251): 106-111. 1990.
  •  134
    Pronouns: anaphora and demonstration
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 125-169. 2005.
    Discusses two main uses of pronouns—anaphoric and demonstrative. These pronouns can belong to an intelligible sentence even if they have no referent, so they vindicate the thesis of RWR. A test for intelligibility is that we can correctly report indirect speech in which such a pronoun is used, replacing the original speaker’s demonstrative pronoun by an anaphoric one. For example, a hallucinator’s utterance of ’That little green man is bald’ can be reported as ‘Hallucinating a little green man, …Read more
    Discusses two main uses of pronouns—anaphoric and demonstrative. These pronouns can belong to an intelligible sentence even if they have no referent, so they vindicate the thesis of RWR. A test for intelligibility is that we can correctly report indirect speech in which such a pronoun is used, replacing the original speaker’s demonstrative pronoun by an anaphoric one. For example, a hallucinator’s utterance of ’That little green man is bald’ can be reported as ‘Hallucinating a little green man, she said that he was bald’.
  •  80
    Mental reference and individual concepts
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 216-254. 2005.
    Applies the book’s main ideas to mental content. The suggestion is that individual concepts, the concepts we use to think about individual objects, should be understood in the RWR or reference-conditional way, so that non-referring ones may be components in genuine thoughts. This is applied to perceptual content, and it is suggested that the RWR approach does best justice to the content of hallucinations.
  •  100
    Framework issues
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 47-85. 2005.
    Sets out the framework within which Reference without referents theory is developed. Truth theoretic semantics, though it certainly cannot tell us everything we wish to know, is accorded a significant role; the impact of the idea of a Russellian proposition is noted and deplored, negative free logic is described and endorsed, a methodology of maximizing ontological conservatism is stated, and the notion of rigidity is explained and shown to be intuitively consistent with lack of a referent.
  •  74
    Existence and fiction
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 195-215. 2005.
    Shows how well the book’s theory applies to existential statements, providing a very straightforward account of true negative ones. The theory also applies reasonably well to fiction, and the remaining problems are problematic for all theories.
  •  64
    Complex referring expressions
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 170-194. 2005.
    Starts by showing that semantic complexity is not as such a barrier to being a referring expression, using the example of compound names. Goes on to consider whether definite descriptions, at least in some uses, should be counted as referring expressions and concludes that they should be, even if one endorses Russellian truth conditions for sentences containing definite descriptions.
  •  83
    A short history of theories of names
    In R. M. Sainsbury (ed.), Reference Without Referents, Oxford University Press Uk. pp. 1-46. 2005.
    Sets out a short history of proper names, those paradigms of referring expressions. The starting point is Mill, and the history is traced through Frege, Russell, Kripke, and McDowell. In the final section, the theory to be defended in the book is briefly stated.
  •  109
    Fiction and Acceptance-Relative Truth, Belief and Assertion
    In Franck Lihoreau (ed.), Truth in Fiction, De Gruyter. pp. 137-152. 2010.
    Assertion
  •  837
    Reference Without Referents
    Clarendon Press. 2005.
    Reference is a central topic in philosophy of language, and has been the main focus of discussion about how language relates to the world. R. M. Sainsbury sets out a new approach to the concept, which promises to bring to an end some long-standing debates in semantic theory. Lucid and accessible, and written with a minimum of technicality, Sainsbury's book also includes a useful historical survey. It will be of interest to those working in logic, mind, and metaphysics as well as essential readin…Read more
    Reference is a central topic in philosophy of language, and has been the main focus of discussion about how language relates to the world. R. M. Sainsbury sets out a new approach to the concept, which promises to bring to an end some long-standing debates in semantic theory. Lucid and accessible, and written with a minimum of technicality, Sainsbury's book also includes a useful historical survey. It will be of interest to those working in logic, mind, and metaphysics as well as essential reading for philosophers of language
    Descriptive Theories of NamesCausal Theories of ReferenceMillian Theories of NamesEmpty NamesTheorie…Read more
    Descriptive Theories of NamesCausal Theories of ReferenceMillian Theories of NamesEmpty NamesTheories of Reference, MiscMental Files
  •  234
    Book review. Think. A compelling introduction to philosophy Simon Blackburn (review)
    Mind 110 (438): 430-432. 2001.
    Moral Expressivism
  •  269
    Review: Crispin Wright: Truth and Objectivity (review)
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4). 1996.
    This belongs to a symposium about Crispin Wright's Truth\nand Objectivity. Wright entertains the "possibility of a\npluralist view of truth." I suggest that this should not\nentail ambiguity in the word "true." For truth to amount to\ndifferent things for different kinds of subject matter no\nmore entails ambiguity than does the fact that existence\namounts to different things for different kinds of entity.\nTurning to cognitive command, I argue that it is trivially\nsatisfied: if I judge that p…Read more
    This belongs to a symposium about Crispin Wright's Truth\nand Objectivity. Wright entertains the "possibility of a\npluralist view of truth." I suggest that this should not\nentail ambiguity in the word "true." For truth to amount to\ndifferent things for different kinds of subject matter no\nmore entails ambiguity than does the fact that existence\namounts to different things for different kinds of entity.\nTurning to cognitive command, I argue that it is trivially\nsatisfied: if I judge that p and you disagree, then under\nsuitable conditions I must take it that something is wrong\nwith your cognitive mechanisms
    Pluralism about TruthMoral ExpressivismRealism and Anti-Realism, MiscQuasi-Realism
  •  1010
    Paradoxien
    with Vincent C. Müller
    Reclam. 1993.
    Translation of Mark Sainsbury: Paradoxes (Cambridge University Press 1988).
    Philosophy, General WorksLiar ParadoxEpistemic ParadoxesSorites ParadoxRussell's ParadoxPhilosophy, …Read more
    Philosophy, General WorksLiar ParadoxEpistemic ParadoxesSorites ParadoxRussell's ParadoxPhilosophy, Introductions and AnthologiesParadox of the Knower
  •  144
    Sameness and Difference of Sense
    Philosophical Books 45 (3): 209-217. 2004.
    Descriptive Theories of NamesFrege's Puzzle
  •  138
    Jody Azzouni , Talking about Nothing: Numbers, Hallucinations and Fictions . Reviewed by
    Philosophy in Review 32 (3): 154-157. 2012.
    Abstract Objects
  •  263
    What is a vague object?
    Analysis 49 (3): 99-103. 1989.
    Vague ObjectsMetaphysical Indeterminacy
  •  141
    Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic
    with T. S. Champlin
    Philosophical Quarterly 42 (167): 243. 1992.
    Logical Forms explains both the detailed problems involved in finding logical forms and also the theoretical underpinnings of philosophical logic. In this revised edition, exercises are integrated throughout the book. The result is a genuinely interactive introduction which engages the reader in developing the argument. Each chapter concludes with updated notes to guide further reading.
    Logic and Philosophy of LogicLogic and Philosophy of Logic, Miscellaneous
  •  2
    Humes Idea of necessary connection
    Manuscrito 20 213-230. 1997.
  •  1164
    Scott Soames, philosophical analysis in the twentieth century: Volume 1: The dawn of analysis (review)
    Philosophical Studies 129 (3). 2006.
    The review praises the philosophical quality, but is less enthusiastic about the scholarship and historical accuracy.
    20th Century Analytic Philosophy, Misc
  •  4
    Evans, G. "The Varieties of Reference" (review)
    Mind 94 (n/a): 120. 1985.
    The SelfTheories of ReferenceSingular Propositions
  •  144
    Russell on constructions and fictions
    Theoria 46 (1): 19-36. 1980.
    Russell says that logical constructions are fictions. Does this show that he took them not to be real things?
    Bertrand Russell
  •  149
    Benevolence and evil
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (2). 1980.
    This Article does not have an abstract
    The Argument from Evil
  •  5
    Philosophical Logic
    In A. C. Grayling (ed.), Philosophy 1: A Guide Through the Subject, Oxford University Press. 1998.
    Logics
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback