• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Caitlin Taylor

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    104
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates

 More details
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Biology
20th Century Philosophy
17th/18th Century Philosophy
  • All publications (104)
  •  140
    Socrates, pleasure, and value. George Rudebusch
    Mind 110 (439): 824-827. 2001.
    SocratesHistory: Pleasure
  •  131
    Studies in greek philosophy
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1). 1999.
    Studies in Greek Philosophy. Gregory Vlastos. Edited by Daniel W. Graham. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 1995. Volume I The Presocratics pp. xxxiv + 389; Volume II Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition pp. xxiv + 349. 40 per volume (hb.), ISBN 0-691-03310-2, 0-691-03311-0; 14.50 per volume (pb.), ISBN 0-691-01937-1, 0-691-01938-X.
    Pre-Socratic PhilosophyAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy, MiscellaneousPre-Socratic Philosophy, Mis…Read more
    Pre-Socratic PhilosophyAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy, MiscellaneousPre-Socratic Philosophy, Misc
  •  120
    Plato's Theory of Forms
    The Classical Review 27 (02): 199-. 1977.
    PlatoClassicsPlato: Forms
  •  100
    Plato's Protagoras. A Socratic Commentary
    The Classical Review 33 (2): 332-333. 1983.
    ClassicsPlato: Protagoras
  •  103
    Plato on Punishment
    The Classical Review 32 (02): 198-. 1982.
    PlatoClassics
  •  146
    Pleasure, Knowledge and Sensation in Democritus
    Phronesis 12 (1): 6-27. 1967.
    History: PleasurePleasure, MiscDemocritus
  •  140
    Plato, Hare and Davidson on akrasia
    Mind 89 (356): 499-518. 1980.
    Davidson poses the problem via three propositions p1-P3, Each persuasive but apparently inconsistent. His solution, That the three are consistent, Merely re-Phrases the problem. We should rather reject p2; if an agent judges that it would be better to do "x" than to do "y", Then he wants to do "x" more than he wants to do "y". Plato accepts p2 because he thinks all agents predominantly self-Interested, And hare because he thinks that evaluative judgments imply desires; both are criticized. An al…Read more
    Davidson poses the problem via three propositions p1-P3, Each persuasive but apparently inconsistent. His solution, That the three are consistent, Merely re-Phrases the problem. We should rather reject p2; if an agent judges that it would be better to do "x" than to do "y", Then he wants to do "x" more than he wants to do "y". Plato accepts p2 because he thinks all agents predominantly self-Interested, And hare because he thinks that evaluative judgments imply desires; both are criticized. An alternative to p2, Consistent with p1 and p3, Makes a subtler connection between judgment, Desire and behaviour
    PlatoDonald Davidson
  •  1734
    Review of Gosling, Pleasure and Desire (review)
    Philosophical Books 11 (3): 12-14. 1970.
    Pleasure and DesireHedonist Accounts of Well-Being
  •  252
    Pleasure
    Analysis 23 (January): 2-20. 1963.
    Pleasure, MiscThe Value of Pleasure
  •  68
    Berkeley on Archetypes
    Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 67 (1): 65-79. 1985.
    History of Western Philosophy17th/18th Century Philosophy
  •  74
    Sympathy and Ethics. A Study of the Relationship between Sympathy and Morality with Special Reference to Hume’s Treatise
    Philosophical Review 82 (4): 537. 1973.
    Empathy and SympathyHume: Value TheoryHume: A Treatise of Human Nature
  •  65
    Reason and Emotion (review)
    International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (4): 514-515. 2000.
    Varieties of EmotionEthics
  •  355
    Berkeley's theory of abstract ideas
    Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111): 97-115. 1978.
    While claiming to refute locke's theory of abstract ideas, Berkeley himself accepts a form of abstractionism. Locke's account of abstraction is indeterminate between two doctrines: 1) abstract ideas are representations of paradigm instances of kinds, 2) abstract ideas are schematic representations of the defining features of kinds. Berkeley's arguments are directed exclusively against 2, And refute only a specific version of it, Which there is no reason to ascribe to locke; berkeley himself acce…Read more
    While claiming to refute locke's theory of abstract ideas, Berkeley himself accepts a form of abstractionism. Locke's account of abstraction is indeterminate between two doctrines: 1) abstract ideas are representations of paradigm instances of kinds, 2) abstract ideas are schematic representations of the defining features of kinds. Berkeley's arguments are directed exclusively against 2, And refute only a specific version of it, Which there is no reason to ascribe to locke; berkeley himself accepts abstract ideas of the former type. Locke's theory suffers from circularity and redundancy, Berkeley's from conflation of thought with imagination
    Locke: Abstract IdeasLocke and Other PhilosophersBerkeley: Abstract IdeasBerkeley and Other Philosop…Read more
    Locke: Abstract IdeasLocke and Other PhilosophersBerkeley: Abstract IdeasBerkeley and Other Philosophers
  •  68
    Applying a Women’s Health Lens to the Study of the Aging Brain
    with Laura Pritschet, Shuying Yu, and Emily G. Jacobs
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13 468826. 2019.
    A major challenge in neuroscience is to understand what happens to a brain as it ages. Such insights could make it possible to distinguish between individuals who will undergo typical aging and those at risk for neurodegenerative disease. Over the last quarter century, thousands of human brain imaging studies have probed the neural basis of age-related cognitive decline. “Aging” studies generally enroll adults over the age of 65, a historical precedent rooted in the average retirement age of U.S…Read more
    A major challenge in neuroscience is to understand what happens to a brain as it ages. Such insights could make it possible to distinguish between individuals who will undergo typical aging and those at risk for neurodegenerative disease. Over the last quarter century, thousands of human brain imaging studies have probed the neural basis of age-related cognitive decline. “Aging” studies generally enroll adults over the age of 65, a historical precedent rooted in the average retirement age of U.S. wage-earners. A consequence of this research tradition is that it overlooks one of the most significant neuroendocrine changes in a woman’s life: the transition to menopause. The menopausal transition is marked by an overall decline in ovarian sex steroid production – up to 90% in the case of estradiol – a dramatic endocrine change that impacts multiple biological systems, including the brain. Despite sex differences in the risk for dementia, the influence that biological sex and sex hormones have on the aging brain is historically understudied, leaving a critical gap in our understanding of the aging process. In this Perspective, we highlight the influence that endocrine factors have on the aging brain. We devote particular attention to the neural and cognitive changes that unfold in the middle decade of life, as a function of reproductive aging. Next, we consider emerging evidence from animal and human studies that other endocrine factors occurring earlier in life (e.g. pregnancy, hormonal birth control use) also shape the aging process. Applying a women’s health lens to.
    Philosophy of Neuroscience
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback