•  153
    Animal minds are real, (distinctively) human minds are not
    American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3): 233-248. 2013.
    Everyone allows that human and animal minds are distinctively (indeed, massively) different in their manifest effects. Humans have been able to colonize nearly every corner of the planet, from the artic, to deserts, to rainforests (and they did so in the absence of modern technological aids); they live together in large cooperative groups of unrelated individuals; they communicate with one another using the open-ended expressive resources of natural language; they are capable of cultural learnin…Read more
  •  103
    Thinking in language?: Evolution and a modularist possibility
    In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), [Book Chapter], Cambridge University Press. pp. 94-119. 1998.
    This chapter argues that our language faculty can both be a peripheral module of the mind and be crucially implicated in a variety of central cognitive functions, including conscious propositional thinking and reasoning. I also sketch arguments for the view that natural language representations (e.g. of Chomsky's Logical Form, or LF) might serve as a lingua franca for interactions (both conscious and non-conscious) between a number of quasi-modular central systems. The ideas presented are compar…Read more
  •  141
    Mindreading in Infancy
    Mind and Language 28 (2): 141-172. 2013.
    Various dichotomies have been proposed to characterize the nature and development of human mindreading capacities, especially in light of recent evidence of mindreading in infants aged 7 to 18 months. This article will examine these suggestions, arguing that none is currently supported by the evidence. Rather, the data support a modular account of the domain-specific component of basic mindreading capacities. This core component is present in infants from a very young age and does not alter fund…Read more
  •  71
    The Philosophy of Psychology
    Cambridge University Press. 1999.
    What is the relationship between common-sense, or 'folk', psychology and contemporary scientific psychology? Are they in conflict with one another? Or do they perform quite different, though perhaps complementary, roles? George Botterill and Peter Carruthers discuss these questions, defending a robust form of realism about the commitments of folk psychology and about the prospects for integrating those commitments into natural science. Their focus throughout the book is on the ways in which cogn…Read more
  • Review of The Paradox of Self-Consciousness by José Luis Bermúdez (review)
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (3): 483-486. 2000.
  •  48
    Review of Edward Stein: Without Good Reason: The Rationality Debate in Philosophy and Cognitive Science_; Jonathan St. B. T. Evans and David E. Over: _Rationality and Reasoning (review)
    with Jonathan St B. T. Evans and David E. Over
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1): 189-193. 1998.
  •  95
    Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition (edited book)
    with Andrew Chamberlain
    Cambridge University Press. 2000.
    How did our minds evolve? Can evolutionary considerations illuminate the question of the basic architecture of the human mind? These are two of the main questions addressed in Evolution and the Human Mind by a distinguished interdisciplinary team of philosophers, psychologists, anthropologists and archaeologists. The essays focus especially on issues to do with modularity of mind, the evolution and significance of natural language, and the evolution of our capacity for meta-cognition, together w…Read more