• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Pierfrancesco Basile

  •  Home
  •  Publications
    67
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    42

 More details
Areas of Interest
Metaphysics
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
Logic and Philosophy of Logic
19th Century Philosophy
20th Century Philosophy
2 more
  • All publications (67)
  •  110
    The Idealist Hydra
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (5): 989-999. 2013.
    No abstract.
  •  68
    Perception Reconsidered (review)
    Process Studies 38 (1): 163-167. 2009.
    Continental Philosophy
  •  99
    Mind & Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False by Thomas Nagel (review)
    Process Studies 43 (1): 111-114. 2014.
    Consciousness and MaterialismDarwinism
  •  100
    Is Mental Composition Impossible in Principle?
    Chromatikon 4 21-25. 2008.
  •  92
    The Reality of Forms: On a Leibnizian Argument for the Existence of God in Whitehead's Metaphysics
    In Chromatikon Iii: Annuaire de la Philosophie En ProcãƒÂ¨s (Yearbook of Philosophy in Process), Presses Univ De Louvain. pp. 27-43. 2007.
  •  171
    Should (Analytic) Philosophy Leave Its History Behind? On A Recent Reappraisal of the Russell / Bradley Debate
    Chromatikon 6 217-224. 2010.
    Francis Herbert Bradley20th Century British Philosophy
  •  82
    Self and World
    Bradley Studies 9 (2): 93-100. 2003.
    It may not be easy to see what Hume, Bradley and James have in common. It is usually recognised that they are empiricist, insofar as they believed that it is experience which furnishes us with all the materials for thinking. Nonetheless, there are many other philosophers which are empiricist in this sense, and Hume is commonly referred to as a ‘sceptic’, Bradley as an ‘idealist’, and only James as a ‘radical empiricist’. Hence I need to provide some justification for putting them under the same …Read more
    It may not be easy to see what Hume, Bradley and James have in common. It is usually recognised that they are empiricist, insofar as they believed that it is experience which furnishes us with all the materials for thinking. Nonetheless, there are many other philosophers which are empiricist in this sense, and Hume is commonly referred to as a ‘sceptic’, Bradley as an ‘idealist’, and only James as a ‘radical empiricist’. Hence I need to provide some justification for putting them under the same one label of ‘Radical Empiricism’.
    20th Century German PhilosophyFrancis Herbert BradleyHume and Other PhilosophersHume: Metaphysics an…Read more
    20th Century German PhilosophyFrancis Herbert BradleyHume and Other PhilosophersHume: Metaphysics and Epistemology
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback