• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Angus John Louis Menuge

Concordia University Wisconsin
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    34
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    21

 More details
  • Concordia University Wisconsin
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
Mequon, Wisconsin, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy of Mind
General Philosophy of Science
Areas of Interest
Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy of Religion
Philosophy of Law
General Philosophy of Science
  • All publications (34)
  •  39
    Against methodological materialism
    In Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The waning of materialism, Oxford University Press. 2010.
    TeleologyIntelligent DesignScience and ReligionPhilosophy of EducationPhysicalism, Misc
  •  28
    Whereof One Can Speak, Thereof One Must Not Be Silent: A Review Essay on Tractatus Logico-Theologicus
    Philosophia Christi 6 (1): 129-138. 2004.
    Philosophy of Religion
  •  66
    Is Downward Causation Possible?
    Philosophia Christi 11 (1): 93-110. 2009.
    Downward causation (mental to physical causation) is controversial in the philosophy of mind. Some materialists argue that such causation is impossible because it (1) violates the causal closure of the physical; (2) is incompatible with natural law; and (3) cannot be reconciled with the empirical evidence from neuroscience. This paper responds to these objections by arguing that (1) there is no good reason to believe that the physical is causally closed; (2) properly understood, natural laws are…Read more
    Downward causation (mental to physical causation) is controversial in the philosophy of mind. Some materialists argue that such causation is impossible because it (1) violates the causal closure of the physical; (2) is incompatible with natural law; and (3) cannot be reconciled with the empirical evidence from neuroscience. This paper responds to these objections by arguing that (1) there is no good reason to believe that the physical is causally closed; (2) properly understood, natural laws are compatible with downward causation; and (3) recent findings in neuroscience reported by Schwartz, Beauregard, and others provide strong empirical support for downward causation.
    Philosophy of ReligionReligious Topics
  •  161
    Supervenience, by chance? Reply to Crane and Mellor
    Analysis 53 (4): 228-235. 1993.
    Supervenience and PhysicalismFormulating PhysicalismSupervenient CausationMental Causation, Misc
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback