-
1MD Grmek, RS Cohen and G. Cimino, eds., On Scientific Discovery (review)Philosophy in Review 3 (3): 122-124. 1983.
-
52Analytica priora I, 38 and Reduplication (review)Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (2): 295-296. 1978.
-
18
-
1En torno a una clase especial de proposiciones reduplicativasAnuario Filosófico 16 (1): 303-306. 1983.
-
84On identity and interchangeability in Leibniz and FregeNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2): 94-100. 1967.
-
D. BUZZETTI, M. FERRIANI and A. TABARRONI "L'insegnamento della logica a Bologna nel XIV secolo" (review)History and Philosophy of Logic 16 (1): 128. 1995.
-
43Three Logicians (review)Review of Metaphysics 36 (4): 926-929. 1983.The author distinguishes three views of negation: 1) term-negation ; 2) predicate-negation ; 3) sentence-negation. Strictly, however, he thinks there is no genuine sentential negation; sentential negation is reducible to the denial of a predicate. The author claims to have shown this in the present book. If sentential negation is regarded as "external" and predicate negation as "internal" to sentences, the reduction of sentential negation to predicate negation is an "internalization" of negation…Read more
-
102Adventures of abstractionPoznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1): 11-35. 2004.
-
3Ioannes Caramuel Lobkowitz: nota bibliográficaTeorema: International Journal of Philosophy 6 (3): 513-518. 1976.
-
Teorema "entrevista a Stuart Hampshire y John R. Searle"Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 6 (3): 519. 1976.
-
126Frege’s Ancestral and Its CircularitiesLogica Universalis 6 (3-4): 477-483. 2012.After presenting the ordinary and the Fregean formulations of the ancestral, I raise the question of what is their relationship, the natural candidate being that the Fregean version is an analysans intended to improve upon, and replace, the common notion of ancestral (the analysandum). Next, two types of circles that arise in connection with the Fregean ancestral are presented, and it is claimed that one of the circles makes it impossible to maintain the just described (“replacement”) interpreta…Read more
-
8Review: Marcel Boll, Jacques Reinhart, Histoire de la Logique (review)Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (2): 285-286. 1966.
-
18E. M. Barth, "The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy" (review)Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (2): 250. 1978.
-
79From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy (review)Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1): 138-139. 2003.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Journal of the History of Philosophy 41.1 (2003) 138-139 [Access article in PDF] Erich H. Reck, editor. From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Pp. xv + 470. Cloth, $65.00. The volume is divided into four main parts: I: "Background and general themes," II: "Frege," III: "Frege to early Wittgenstein," and IV: "Early Wittgenstein." Part I includes the following ess…Read more
-
12Birúkov B. V.. Krušénié métafizičéskoj koncépcii universal′ nosti prédmétnoj oblasti v logiké . Gosudarstvénnoé Izdatél′stvo “Vysšaá Škola,” Moscow 1963, 75 pp (review)Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4): 571-572. 1970.
-
4The Troubled History of AbstractionHistory of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 8. 2005.For centuries abstraction was understood as an operation according to which, from a given phenomenon, something is kept, but something else is not paid attention to, is ”abstracted from”. This notion of abstraction not only has been rejected by the mainstream of analytic philosophy and logic as worthless psychologism but, moreover, largely replaced by a new conception of abstraction in which the allegedly ”psychological” feature of ”not paying attention to”, or ”abstracting from”, is no longer v…Read more
-
65Studies on Gottlob Frege and traditional philosophy (edited book)D. Reidel. 1967.I wish to express, first of all, my profound gratitude to Professor J. M. Bochenski, without whose assistance the present work would have not been possible. To be concise, I would like to state that his contribution to this book may be viewed at three levels: (1) that of the general spirit, (2) that of the specific ideas, theses or approaches which are expressed in its pages, (3) that of this work qua doctoral dissertation. The general spirit which has guided my research coincides with that unde…Read more
-
2En torno a la silogística modal aristotélicaTeorema: International Journal of Philosophy 9 (2): 165-182. 1979.
-
9Review: B. V. Birukov, The Downfall of the Metaphysical Conception of the Universality of Object Domains in Logic (review)Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (4): 571-572. 1970.
Austin, Texas, United States of America