• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Raymond Martin

Union College
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    124
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  News and Updates
    38

 More details
  • Union College
    Department of Philosophy
    Regular Faculty
University of Rochester
Department of Philosophy
PhD
Areas of Specialization
History of Western Philosophy
Philosophy, Misc
Other Academic Areas
Areas of Interest
History of Western Philosophy
Philosophy, Misc
Other Academic Areas
  • All publications (124)
  •  115
    P. Cornelius Tacitus: Annalium ab Excessu Diui Augusti Quae Supersunt. Edidit Harald Fuchs. Volumen ii , pp. viii+256. Frauenfeld: Huber, 1973. Cloth, 9.80Sw.fr
    The Classical Review 25 (2): 316-316. 1975.
    Classics
  •  75
    Kommentar zum Agricola des Tacitus (review)
    The Classical Review 36 (1): 136-137. 1986.
  •  111
    Suetonius Andrew Wallace-Hadrill: Suetonius. The Scholar and his Caesars. (Classical Life and Letters.) Pp. ix + 216. London: Duckworth, 1983. £19.50 (review)
    The Classical Review 35 (01): 40-41. 1985.
    ClassicsAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  •  156
    Tacitus, Histories V - Heinz Heubner: P. Cornelius Tacitus, Die Historien. Kommentar, Vol. V: Fünftes Buck, von H. Heubner und W. Fauth. Pp. 178. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 1982. DM. 150
    The Classical Review 33 (2): 218-220. 1983.
    Classics
  •  202
    Pierre Wuilleumier: Tacitus, Annals i–iii. Pp. lxii + 201 . Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1974. Paper, 50 frs
    The Classical Review 27 (1): 117-117. 1977.
    ClassicsHellenistic and Later Ancient Philosophy, Misc
  •  138
    Tacitus' Histories
    The Classical Review 21 (03): 381-. 1971.
    Ancient Greek and Roman PhilosophyClassics
  •  85
    Tacitus, Annales xi–xii
    The Classical Review 28 (2): 352-353. 1978.
    Classics
  •  65
    Historische Untersuchungen zum Domitianbild des Tacitus (review)
    The Classical Review 24 (1): 154-155. 1974.
  •  54
    Die Prologe des Terenz (review)
    The Classical Review 26 (1): 123-124. 1976.
    Classics
  •  77
    Gerücht, Gerede, öffentliche Meinung: Interpretationen zur Psychologie und Darstellungskunst des Tacitus (review)
    The Classical Review 22 (1): 112-113. 1972.
    Classics
  •  76
    Tacitus Histories ii
    The Classical Review 24 (02): 209-. 1974.
    ClassicsAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  •  108
    The Dialogus
    The Classical Review 22 (03): 356-. 1972.
    ClassicsAncient Greek and Roman Philosophy
  • L'Apocalyptique d'après trois travaux récents
    Revue de Théologie Et de Philosophie 20 (n/a): 310-318. 1970.
  •  137
    On Hartshorne’s “Creative Synthesis” and Event Logic
    Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (4): 399-410. 1971.
    Charles Hartshorne
  • The Elusive Messiah: A Philosophical Overview of the Quest for the Historical Jesus
  • William H. Dray, On History and Philosophers of History (review)
    Philosophy in Review 10 359-361. 1990.
  • History and Subjectivity
    Ratio (Misc.) 21 (1): 44. 1979.
  • B. RIGAUX: "Témoignage de l'évangile de Matthieu" (review)
    Revue de Théologie Et de Philosophie 20 (n/a): 120. 1970.
  • W. Von schöfer: "Was geht uns Noah an"? (review)
    Revue de Théologie Et de Philosophie 20 (n/a): 119. 1970.
  • Hacia una Poética del Fragmento: el Cine de Jarmusch. Una lectura desde Deleuze
    A Parte Rei 66. 2009.
  •  36
    Explanatory Controversy in Historical Studies
    In Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause: Essays Presented to Richard Taylor, D. Reidel. pp. 219--235. 1980.
  •  1
    Historians on Miracles
    In God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, Longman Publications. 2003.
    Secular academic historians of religious subject matter often characterize their approach as objective, contrasting it with the approaches of religiously-oriented historians. On the assumption that the denial of a theological claim is itself a theological claim, I question this characterization. After a brief discussion of Spinoza and Hume on miracles, I survey the work of several secular, academic historians of the New Testament in order to illustrate how on the issue of miracles they are commi…Read more
    Secular academic historians of religious subject matter often characterize their approach as objective, contrasting it with the approaches of religiously-oriented historians. On the assumption that the denial of a theological claim is itself a theological claim, I question this characterization. After a brief discussion of Spinoza and Hume on miracles, I survey the work of several secular, academic historians of the New Testament in order to illustrate how on the issue of miracles they are committed to theological conclusions in advance of their study of the evidence. I point this out not as a criticism, but merely as something that needs to be taken into account in assessing their claims to objectivity. In my view, secular historians, like all historians, bring to their study of the historical evidence a certain framework of real possibilities. It is only within this framework, if anywhere, that they are genuinely open-minded. What lies outside their frameworks has already been exclu
  •  42
    On Individuality and Quantification in Peirce's Published Logic Papers, 1867-1885
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (3). 1976.
    Charles Sanders Peirce
  •  38
    On Set Theory and Royce's Modes of Action
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (3). 1976.
    Charles Sanders Peirce
  •  48
    On Peirce's Anticipation of the Semantic Notion of Truth: A Dialogue with Velian
    Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13 (4). 1977.
    Charles Sanders Peirce
  •  40
    On Weighting Causes
    American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (4). 1972.
    Philosophy of Consciousness
  •  29
    The Past Within Us: An Empirical Approach to Philosophy of History
    . 1989.
    Why do we interpret the past as we do, rather than in some other way or not at all? What is the significance of the fact that we interpret the past? What are historical interpretations? Raymond Martin's approach to these questions transcends both the positivist and humanistic perspectives that have polarized Anglo-American philosophy of history. Martin goes to the source of this polarization by diagnosing a deep-seated flaw in the dominant analytic approach during the period from 1935 to 1975, n…Read more
    Why do we interpret the past as we do, rather than in some other way or not at all? What is the significance of the fact that we interpret the past? What are historical interpretations? Raymond Martin's approach to these questions transcends both the positivist and humanistic perspectives that have polarized Anglo-American philosophy of history. Martin goes to the source of this polarization by diagnosing a deep-seated flaw in the dominant analytic approach during the period from 1935 to 1975, namely, the emphasis on conceptual analysis rather than the examination of actual historical controversies. As an alternative, Martin proposes an empirical approach that examines what makes one historical interpretation better than its competitors. In addressing how historians should decide which explanations are better, Martin opts for a case-by-case analysis of historiographical practice as opposed to establishing general criteria. His book offers several detailed case studies, involving such topics as the collapse of Lowland Maya civilization in the ninth century A.D., the fall of Rome, and the alleged historical priority of St. Mark's gospel over the other synoptic gospels. Originally published in 1989. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These paperback editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
    Philosophy of History
  •  38
    God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion
    Longman Publications. 2003.
    God Matters is a state-of-the-art, accessible anthology of the major issues in philosophy of religion. Its accessibility is due to its mix of classic readings and brand new readings about contemporary issues, commissioned specifically with an undergraduate student in mind. These commissioned readings make the difficult concepts of contemporary philosophy of religion easy to understand, and are complemented by key excerpts from more technical philosophers' writing on the same subjects. The result…Read more
    God Matters is a state-of-the-art, accessible anthology of the major issues in philosophy of religion. Its accessibility is due to its mix of classic readings and brand new readings about contemporary issues, commissioned specifically with an undergraduate student in mind. These commissioned readings make the difficult concepts of contemporary philosophy of religion easy to understand, and are complemented by key excerpts from more technical philosophers' writing on the same subjects. The result is an engaging, comprehensive reader that introduces students to the most important ideas in classical and contemporary philosophy of religion, to the most important thinkers, and even to excerpts from the key texts in which these thinkers presented their groundbreaking theories.
    Philosophy of Religion, Miscellaneous
  •  64
    Hintikka’s Intentions and Possible Worlds
    Review of Metaphysics 33 (1). 1979.
    THIS BOOK is, in effect, a sequel to the author’s Models for Modalities and purports to carry forward the case for the feasibility of a "possible-worlds" semantics. The main contention of the book is that such a semantics has its chief application in the study of propositional attitudes. But a good deal more than this is claimed, namely, applicability to the study of epistemic notions in general, to the study of causality and the language of the sciences, to the exact study of phenomenology, to …Read more
    THIS BOOK is, in effect, a sequel to the author’s Models for Modalities and purports to carry forward the case for the feasibility of a "possible-worlds" semantics. The main contention of the book is that such a semantics has its chief application in the study of propositional attitudes. But a good deal more than this is claimed, namely, applicability to the study of epistemic notions in general, to the study of causality and the language of the sciences, to the exact study of phenomenology, to the linguistics, to the problem of "representation" in the arts, and even to the foundations of statistics and probability theory.
    Metaphysics and EpistemologyPhilosophy of Linguistics
  •  57
    Narration, Objectivity, and Methodological Truth
    The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 8 133-144. 2000.
    In this essay, I argue that scientists and historians employ different strategies to overcome a common problem: subjectivity. The difference in their strategies is symptomatic of a fundamental difference between science and the humanities. It is that whereas physical scientists, in trying to be objective, aspire to the view from nowhere, humanistic historians, in trying to be objective, aspire to the views from everywhere.
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback