-
45In this paper, I take up the conciliatory-steadfast debate occurring within social epistemology in regards to the phenomenon of peer disagreement. I will argue, because the conciliatory perspective al-lows us to understand argumentation pragmatically—as a method of problem-solving within a community rather than as a method for obtaining the truth—that in most cases, we should not simply agree to disagree.
-
University of LethbridgeDepartment of PhilosophyJarislowsky Chair In Trust and Political Leadership
Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Areas of Interest
10 more