•  48
    Feigning introspective blindness for thought
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2): 153-154. 2009.
    I argue that the very reasons Carruthers gives for why the account should allow introspective access to perceptual/quasi-perceptual states, can be given for thought, as well. I also argue that we have good subjectively accessible grounds for the intuition in introspective thoughts, notwithstanding Carruthers' argument to the contrary and his attempt to explain the intuition away
  •  97
    Advancing the debate between HOT and FO accounts of consciousness
    Journal of Philosophical Research 28 23-44. 2003.
    David Rosenthal and Fred Dretske agree that creature consciousness should be used to give a reductive explanation of state consciousness. They disagree, however, over what type of creature consciousness will do the job. Rosenthal, defending a higher-order thought account, argues that higher-order creature consciousness is what is needed. Dretske, defending a first-order account, argues that first-order creature consciousness is what is needed. I attempt to advance this debate by presenting a cas…Read more
  • I know you see it wrong! Children use others’ false perceptions to predict their behaviors
    with Carla Krachun
    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 150 380-395. 2016.
    Research on children’s ability to attribute false mental states to others has focused exclusively on false beliefs. We developed a novel paradigm that focuses instead on another type of false mental state: false perceptions. From approximately 4 years of age, children begin to recognize that their perception of an illusory object can be at odds with its true properties. Our question was whether they also recognize that another individual viewing the object will similarly experience a false perce…Read more