• PhilPapers
  • PhilPeople
  • PhilArchive
  • PhilEvents
  • PhilJobs
  • Sign in
PhilPeople
 
  • Sign in
  • News Feed
  • Find Philosophers
  • Departments
  • Radar
  • Help
 
profile-cover
Drag to reposition
profile picture

Pam R. Sailors

Missouri State University
  •  Home
  •  Publications
    35
    • Most Recent
    • Most Downloaded
    • Topics
  •  Events
    1
  •  News and Updates
    14

 More details
  • Missouri State University
    Department of Philosophy
    Professor
University of Georgia
Department of Philosophy
PhD, 1996
Springfield, Missouri, United States of America
Areas of Specialization
Philosophy, Misc
Value Theory
Other Academic Areas
Areas of Interest
Applied Ethics
Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
Value Theory
Other Academic Areas
Philosophy, Misc
Philosophical Traditions
1 more
  • All publications (35)
  •  117
    More Than a Pair of Shoes: Running and Technology
    Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (2): 207-216. 2009.
    No abstract
    Philosophy of Sport
  •  76
    Comments on William Garland’s “Can Care Generate Global Moral Concern?”
    Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (2): 147-150. 2001.
    Feminist Ethics
  •  80
    Sport, Philosophy, and Good Lives
    Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42 (2): 311-315. 2015.
    Philosophy of Sport
  •  14
    Kathi Weeks, Constituting Feminist Subjects (review)
    Philosophy in Review 19 (4): 241-244. 1999.
    Feminist Metaphysics
  •  141
    Autonomy, Benevolence, and Alzheimer's Disease
    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2): 184-193. 2001.
    Medical ethics has traditionally been governed by two guiding, but sometimes conflicting, principlesthe Substituted Judgment Standard shows our concern for autonomy, whereas the Best Interest Standard shows our commitment to benevolence. Both standards are vulnerable to criticisms. Further, the principles can seem to offer conflicting prescriptions for action. The criticisms and conflict figure prominently in discussion of advance directive decisionmaking and Alzheimer's disease. After laying ou…Read more
    Medical ethics has traditionally been governed by two guiding, but sometimes conflicting, principlesthe Substituted Judgment Standard shows our concern for autonomy, whereas the Best Interest Standard shows our commitment to benevolence. Both standards are vulnerable to criticisms. Further, the principles can seem to offer conflicting prescriptions for action. The criticisms and conflict figure prominently in discussion of advance directive decisionmaking and Alzheimer's disease. After laying out each of the current standards and its problems, with Alzheimer's issues as my central concern, I offer a new standard that avoids the problems while honoring our concerns for both autonomy and benevolence
    Biomedical EthicsAutonomy in Applied EthicsPublic HealthAlzheimer's Disease
  • Prev.
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
PhilPeople logo

On this site

  • Find a philosopher
  • Find a department
  • The Radar
  • Index of professional philosophers
  • Index of departments
  • Help
  • Acknowledgments
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Terms and conditions

Brought to you by

  • The PhilPapers Foundation
  • The American Philosophical Association
  • Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University
PhilPeople is currently in Beta Sponsored by the PhilPapers Foundation and the American Philosophical Association
Feedback