•  140
    Conversational Exercitives and the Force of Pornography
    Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2): 155-189. 2003.
    This paper criticizes Langton's speech act account of MacKinnon's claim about (the subordinating force of) pornography and offers a different account of how speech might enact harmful norms and thus constitute harm.
  •  261
    On 'Whites Only' Signs and Racist Hate Speech: Verbal Acts of Racial Discrimination
    In Ishani Maitra & Mary Kate McGowan (eds.), Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, Oxford University Press. pp. 121-147. 2012.
    This paper argues that racist speech in public places ought to be regulable even with teh strict free speech protections of the First Amendment. McGowan argues that the same justification for regulating the hanging of a 'Whites Only' sign applies to racist utterances in public spaces
  •  87
    The neglected controversy over metaphysical realism
    Philosophy 77 (1): 5-21. 2002.
    In what follows, I motivate and clarify the controversy over metaphysical realism (the claim that there is a single objective way that the world is) by defending it against two objections. A clear understanding of why these objections are misguided goes a considerable distance in illuminating the complex and controversial nature of m-realism. Once the complex thesis is defined, some objections to it are considered. Since m-realism is such a complex and controversial thesis, it cannot legitimatel…Read more
  •  117
    “On Indirect Speech Acts and Linguistic Communication: A Response to Bertolet”1: McGowan, Tam and Hall
    with Shan Shan Tam and Margaret Hall
    Philosophy 84 (4): 495-513. 2009.
    Suppose a diner says, 'Can you pass the salt?' Although her utterance is literally a question (about the physical abilities of the addressee), most would take it as a request (that the addressee pass the salt). In such a case, the request is performed indirectly by way of directly asking a question. Accordingly this utterance is known as an indirect speech act. On the standard account of such speech acts, a single utterance constitutes two distinct speech acts. On this account then, 'Can you pas…Read more
  •  145
    A Partial Defense of Illocutionary Silencing
    with Alexandra Adelman, Sara Helmers, and Jacqueline Stolzenberg
    Hypatia 26 (1). 2011.
    Catharine MacKinnon has pioneered a new brand of anti-pornography argument. In particular, MacKinnon claims that pornography silences women in a way that violates their right to free speech. In what follows, we focus on a certain account of silencing put forward by Jennifer Hornsby and Rae Langton, and we defend that account against two important objections. The first objection contends that this account makes a crucial but false assumption about the necessary role of hearer recognition in succe…Read more