-
30Supreme emergencies and the continuum problemJournal of Military Ethics 11 (4): 287-298. 2012.Many believe that in?supreme emergencies? collectives are granted what I elsewhere call?special permissions?, permissions to carry out self-defensive acts which would otherwise be morally forbidden. However, there appears to be a continuum between non-emergency, emergency and supreme-emergency situations, which gives rise to the following problem: If special permissions are granted in supreme emergencies, they should apply, mutatis mutandis, to less extreme cases too. If, to save itself from who…Read more
-
30In Bello Proportionality: Philosophical Reflections on a Disturbing Empirical StudyJournal of Military Ethics 21 (2): 116-131. 2022.A recent empirical study has argued that experts in the ethics or the law of war cannot reach reasonable convergence on dilemmas regarding the number of civilian casualties who may be killed as a side effect of attacks on legitimate military targets. This article explores the philosophical implications of that study. We argue that the wide disagreement between experts on what in bello proportionality means in practice casts serious doubt on their ability to provide practical real-life guidance. …Read more
-
29Ending War Short of Victory? A Contractarian View of Jus Ex BelloEthics 125 (3): 720-750. 2015.In light of the enormous suffering brought about by war, war might be justified only if the benefit it yields is significant enough, namely, a clear and durable victory over the enemy. The logic of this argument leads to a Clausewitz-style war of “annihilation.” I argue that the best way to justify the ending of war short of such annihilation is by relying on a contractarian view of jus ex bello. I conclude by exploring the implications of this view to warfare in which no effective social contra…Read more
-
27Rejecting the Objectification HypothesisReview of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (1): 113-130. 2024.The last decade or so has witnessed a wave of empirical studies purporting to show that men’s sexual focus on the female body leads to increased hostility and aggression against women. According to what I call “The Objectification Hypothesis”, the explanation for this phenomenon has to do with the fact that, in such circumstances, men “objectify” women, that is, regard them as mere objects or as means only. The paper rejects this hypothesis and offers an alternative explanation for the connectio…Read more
-
27Feminism, Honor and Self-Defense: A Response to HerethPublic Affairs Quarterly 37 (1): 64-78. 2023.Sometimes victims cannot defend themselves against the threat posed to them, but they can nevertheless harm or even kill their aggressors. Since they cannot defend themselves, it is unclear how such harming can be justified under the title of self-defense. According to the “Honor Solution,” by violently resisting their aggressors, victims do (partially) defend themselves because they protect their honor. Blake Hereth recently argued that this solution is incompatible with the feminist commitment…Read more
-
25Moral DilemmasBrill | Rodopi. 1995.Moral dilemmas set a challenge for ethical theory. They are situations where agents seem to be under an obligation both to do, and to refrain from doing, a specific act. Are such situations possible? What is their exact nature? These are the questions that _Moral Dilemmas_ tries to answer. The book argues that moral theories should not allow for the possibility of irresolvable dilemmas, for situations in which no right answer exists. To this end, arguments seeking to prove the existence of irres…Read more
-
23Michael L. Gross, Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric ConflictJournal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3): 467-469. 2012.
-
22The Success Condition for Legitimate Self-DefenseProceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3 (4): 89-94. 2008.The paper discusses a neglected condition for justified self-defense, namely, 'The Success Condition [SC].' According to SC, otherwise immoral acts can be justified under the right to self-defense only if they actually achieve the intended defense from the perceived threat. If they don't, they are almost always excused, but not morally justified. I show that SC leads to a troubling puzzle because victims who estimate they cannot prevent the attack against them would be morally required to surren…Read more
-
19Modern orthodoxy and morality: an uneasy partnershipInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion 88 (2): 167-180. 2020.Modern orthodoxy often perceives itself and is perceived by others as a movement which grants more importance to moral considerations in its interpretation of halakha and in its general worldview than does the ultra-orthodox movement. Accordingly, modern orthodox rabbis are often referred to as more “moderate” than their ultra-orthodox counterparts, a term which seems to imply that they are more open to moral arguments and more likely to adopt, or to develop, moral interpretations of halakha. A …Read more
-
19The Protection of Holy PlacesLaw and Ethics of Human Rights 10 (1): 135-155. 2016.Journal Name: The Law & Ethics of Human Rights Issue: Ahead of print
-
19Note: Reciprocity of Rights and Duties, Benefits and Burdens: National Service for Israeli ArabsLaw and Ethics of Human Rights 6 (2): 247-258. 2012.Jews and Arabs in Israel often agree that there is a reciprocal relation between rights and duties, though they derive opposing conclusions from it. Jews infer that Arabs are not entitled to the same rights and privileges as Jews are, since they do not shoulder an equal share of the duties. Arabs, by contrast, argue that they are under no duty to share the burdens, particularly military or national service, since their rights are not fully respected. The Paper assesses these opposing claims and …Read more
-
16Note: Reciprocity of Rights and Duties, Benefits and Burdens: National Service for Israeli ArabsThe Law and Ethics of Human Rights 6 (2). 2013.
-
16Why Benefitting a Person Cannot Constitute a Form of DiscriminationRatio Juris 34 (4): 315-330. 2021.Ratio Juris, Volume 34, Issue 4, Page 315-330, December 2021.
-
15War by Agreement: A Contractarian Ethics of WarOxford University Press. 2019.Yitzhak Benbaji and Daniel Statman present a new theory on the ethics of war which shows that wars can be morally justified at both the ad bellum level and the in bello level.
-
12Why Benefitting a Person Cannot Constitute a Form of DiscriminationRatio Juris 34 (4): 315-330. 2021.The purpose of this article is to discuss whether a person can be discriminated against by means of an action intended to benefit him or her. The discussion is triggered by a recent court decision according to which women may be entitled to compensation for a policy that made them better off in some respect because of its assumed effect on the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes about women. I reject this view, arguing that such effects are neither necessary nor sufficient for an act to be discr…Read more
-
12Response to Five CriticsLaw and Philosophy 41 (6): 785-816. 2022.In response to our critics, we explain why in spite of the ad bellum breach involved in the first use of force the war agreement is still binding; why the moral symmetry to which War by Agreement subscribes benefits all parties, weak and strong; why contractarianism leaves room the for moral option of not acting within one's rights and refusing to take part in a seemingly unjust war; why contractarianism is superior to rights-consequentialism as a theory of just war; and why contractarianism doe…Read more
-
9Nomos Without Narrative: A Reply to Talia FisherTheoretical Inquiries in Law Forum 9 (2 Forum). 2008.
-
91. Introduction to Virtue EthicsIn Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader, Edinburgh University Press. pp. 1-41. 1997.
-
6Religion and MoralityRodopi. 1995.Religion and Morality seeks to answer two fundamental questions regarding the relation between religion and morality. The first is the puzzle posed by Socrates, the so-called 'Euthyphro dilemma', which asks: is morality valuable by virtue of its intrinsic importance and worth, or is morality valuable because, and only because, God approves it and commands us to follow its dictates? The second question is raised by Kierkegaard in Fear and Trembling. He asks: Is a conflict between religion and mor…Read more
-
6Moral DilemmasBrill | Rodopi. 1995.Moral dilemmas set a challenge for ethical theory. They are situations where agents seem to be under an obligation both to do, and to refrain from doing, a specific act. Are such situations possible? What is their exact nature? These are the questions that _Moral Dilemmas_ tries to answer. The book argues that moral theories should not allow for the possibility of irresolvable dilemmas, for situations in which no right answer exists. To this end, arguments seeking to prove the existence of irres…Read more
-
6State and Religion in Israel: A Philosophical-Legal InquiryCambridge University Press. 2018.State and Religion in Israel begins with a philosophical analysis of the two main questions regarding the role of religion in liberal states: should such states institute a 'Wall of Separation' between state and religion? Should they offer religious practices and religious communities special protection? Gideon Sapir and Daniel Statman argue that liberalism in not committed to Separation, but is committed to granting religion a unique protection, albeit a narrower one than often assumed. They th…Read more
-
6Religion and MoralityBrill | Rodopi. 1995._Religion and Morality_ seeks to answer two fundamental questions regarding the relation between religion and morality. The first is the puzzle posed by Socrates, the so-called '_Euthyphro_ dilemma', which asks: is morality valuable by virtue of its intrinsic importance and worth, or is morality valuable because, and only because, God approves it and commands us to follow its dictates? The second question is raised by Kierkegaard in _Fear and Trembling_. He asks: Is a conflict between religion a…Read more
-
2"מעמדה של הדת במדינה תופס מקום מרכזי בשיח הציבורי והפוליטי, בארץ ובעולם. ייחודו של ספר זה בתפיסה השיטתית והמקיפה שלו באשר למקום הדת בישראל. מצד אחד, הספר דוחה את ההנחה הרווחת שלפיה הליברליזם מחייב את הפרדת הדת והמדינה. מצד אחר, הספר מציע פרשנות מצמצמת והגנות המיוחדות המוענקות לדתיים, המעוגנות בזכות לחופש דת ובחשיבות ההגנה על רגשות דתיים. נושאים מעוררי מחלוקת ורגישים כגון גיוס בחורי ישיבות, מימון ממשלתי לחינוך הדתי ונישואים וגירושים ברבנות נדונים בספר במבט מפוכח, משפטי ופילוסופי, המספק כלים לחשיב…Read more
-
Moral tragedies, supreme emergencies and national-defenceIn David Rodin (ed.), War, torture and terrorism: ethics and war in the 21st century, Blackwell. 2007.
-
Targeted killingIn Timothy Shanahan (ed.), Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism, Open Court. 2005.