-
89
-
102A Lifetime's Devotion to Philosophy Suzanne Mansion (intr., indices & bibliography by J. Follon): Études Aristotéliciennes. Recueil d'Articles. (Aristote, Traductions et Études.) Pp. xxi + 550. Louvain-la-Neuve: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, 1984. B. frs. 1300 (review)The Classical Review 36 (01): 72-73. 1986.
-
110David Roochnik: The Tragedy of Reason: Toward a Platonic Conception of Logos. Pp. xv + 223. New York and London: Routledge, 1990. £30 (review)The Classical Review 42 (1): 205-206. 1992.
-
109The Sophists and Legal Philosophy S. Kirste, K. Waechter, M. Walther (edd.): Die Sophistik. Entstehung, Gestalt und Folgeprobleme des Gegensatzes von Naturrecht und positivem Recht . Pp. 175. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002. Paper, €36. ISBN: 3-515-08194- (review)The Classical Review 55 (01): 47-. 2005.
-
107
-
84Review of David L. Perry, The Concept of Pleasure (review)Philosophical Books 9 (1): 19-21. 1968.
-
60The Charmides - Berndt Witte: Die Wissenschaft vom Guten und Bösen: Interpretationen zu Platons ‘Charmides’. (Unters. z. Ant. Lit. u. Gesch., 5.) Pp. vii+166. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1970. Cloth, DM. 48 (review)The Classical Review 22 (02): 196-198. 1972.
-
88Socratic Perplexity and the nature of philosophy (review)Ancient Philosophy 20 (2): 451-454. 2000.
-
131Studies in greek philosophyBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1). 1999.Studies in Greek Philosophy. Gregory Vlastos. Edited by Daniel W. Graham. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 1995. Volume I The Presocratics pp. xxxiv + 389; Volume II Socrates, Plato, and Their Tradition pp. xxiv + 349. 40 per volume (hb.), ISBN 0-691-03310-2, 0-691-03311-0; 14.50 per volume (pb.), ISBN 0-691-01937-1, 0-691-01938-X.
-
94Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to PlotinusPhilosophical Review 122 (4): 667-670. 2013.
-
140Plato, Hare and Davidson on akrasiaMind 89 (356): 499-518. 1980.Davidson poses the problem via three propositions p1-P3, Each persuasive but apparently inconsistent. His solution, That the three are consistent, Merely re-Phrases the problem. We should rather reject p2; if an agent judges that it would be better to do "x" than to do "y", Then he wants to do "x" more than he wants to do "y". Plato accepts p2 because he thinks all agents predominantly self-Interested, And hare because he thinks that evaluative judgments imply desires; both are criticized. An al…Read more
-
169Plato and the mathematicians: An examination of professor Hare's viewsPhilosophical Quarterly 17 (68): 193-203. 1967.197: on logon didonai as giving a proof. In answer to Plato's charge that mathematicians take as their starting point certain unproved assumptions, and call upon them to "give an account" of them in the sense of deriving them from some more basic principle or principles
Areas of Specialization
| Epistemology |
| Metaphysics |
| Applied Ethics |
| Meta-Ethics |