•  36
    The prevailing view in television studies is that evaluative criticism involves the expression of wholly subjective tastes or attitudes. Moreover, the idea that evaluative judgements could be in any way objective or truthful tends to be greeted with deep scepticism and suspicion. This essay argues that the prevailing view – ‘expressivism’ – is unsatisfactory and unsustainable, and it advances a moderate version of objectivism.
  •  176
    Moderate Comic Immoralism and the Genetic Approach to the Ethical Criticism of Art
    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2): 169-179. 2014.
    According to comic moralism, moral flaws make comic works less funny or not funny at all. In contrast, comic immoralism is the view that moral flaws make comic works funnier. In this article, I argue for a moderate version of comic immoralism. I claim that, sometimes, comic works are funny partly in virtue of their moral flaws. I argue for this claim—and artistic immoralism more generally—by identifying artistically valuable moral flaws in relevant actions undertaken in the creation of those wor…Read more
  •  123
    Ontology, Intentionality, and Television Aesthetics
    Screen 53 (2): 164-179. 2012.
    This essay suggests that television aesthetics, as a research project, would benefit from attending to relevant theoretical debates in philosophical aesthetics. One reason for this is that assumptions about the ontology of television artworks are already embedded in our critical practices. We ought to be more aware of what these assumptions are and state them more explicitly. Moreover, I argue, for debates in television aesthetics to get off the ground, we need to ensure we bring the largely the…Read more
  •  122
    New Takes in Film‐Philosophy edited by carel, havi and greg tuck (review)
    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3): 326-328. 2012.