-
447Epistemic Justice, Ignorance, and Procedural Objectivity—Editor's IntroductionHypatia 26 (2): 233-235. 2011.The groundwork has long been laid, by feminist and critical race theorists, for recognizing that a robust social epistemology must be centrally concerned with questions of epistemic injustice; it must provide an account of how inequitable social relations inflect what counts as knowledge and who is recognized as a credible knower. The cluster of papers we present here came together serendipitously and represent a striking convergence of interest in exactly these issues. In their different ways, …Read more
-
Reassessing the Profile and Needs of Battered WomenCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health 7 (2): 292-303. 1988.
-
The Interpretive DilemmaIn Valerie Pinsky & Alison Wylie (eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of archaeology, Cambridge University Press. pp. 18-28. 1989.
-
65Doing Philosophy As a Feminist: Longino on the Search for a Feminist EpistemologyPhilosophical Topics 23 (2): 345-358. 1995.
-
27One World and Our Knowledge of It (review)International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3): 83-85. 1986.
-
10Review: Time and Traditions by Bruce G. Trigger (review)International Studies in Philosophy 11 193-195. 1979.
-
4Contextualizing Ethics: Comments on ‘Ethics in Canadian Archaeology’ by Robert RosenswigCanadian Journal of Archaeology 21 115-120. 1997.
-
15Review: Testing Scientific Theories, John Earman (Ed.): Explaining Confirmation Practice (review)Philosophy of Science 55 (2). 1988.The contributions to Testing Scientific Theories are unified by an interest in responding to criticisms directed by Glymour against existing models of confirmation–-chiefly H-D and Bayesian schemas–-and in assessing and correcting the “bootstrap“ model of confirmation that he proposed as an alternative in Theory and Evidence. As such, they provide a representative sample of objections to Glymour's model and of the wide range of new initiatives in thinking about scientific confirmation that it ha…Read more
-
Afterword: On WavesIn Pamela L. Geller & Miranda K. Stockett (eds.), Feminist Anthropology: Past, Present, and Future, University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 167-176. 2006.
-
24Feminist theories of social power: Some implications for a processual archaeologyNorwegian Archaeological Review 25 (1): 51-68. 1992.Recent feminist analyses of power constitute a resource for theorizing power that archaeologists cannot afford to ignore given the importance of ‘post‐processual’ arguments that social relations, in which power is a central dimension, are as constitutive of system level dynamics as is the environment in which cultural systems are situated. I argue that they are important on two fronts: they articulate a dynamic, situational conception of power that resists reification, and they suggest a strateg…Read more
-
Archaeology and Philosophy of ScienceIn N. J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Pergamon Press. pp. 614-617. 2001.
-
5Women and Violence: Feminist Practice and Quantitative MethodIn Sandra Burt & Lorraine Code (eds.), Changing Methods: Feminists Transforming Practice, Broadview Press. pp. 301-325. 1995.
-
Feminism and Social ScienceIn Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Genealogy to Iqbal, Routledge. pp. 588-593. 1998.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada